Colossus
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 3,505
- Reaction score
- 547
I posted this on my blog today, but I thought it would be a good forum topic.
---------------
I notice that most game material is put forth with one unifying objective: to have sex with as many attractive women as possible, as efficiently as possible.
This is good in many ways, because it cuts through a lot of bullsh!t and gets to the nuts and bolts of game --the psychology, the action, and the most important thing of all, experience. Just like in the physical world, there are laws in male-female interactions and if you are aware of them you can achieve predictable results.
However, at a certain point for many guys this is no longer our objective. There is a point of diminishing returns where further lays and volume dating isn't yielding anything measurably positive to your life. If anything, you are just seeing patterns, not people, and some serious cynicism can ensue. I notice this especially in online dating, since patterns are more evident due to the standardized format.
As such, I've been reading a lot of day game material lately (due to my horrible deficiency in this area), and I got to thinking about what exactly my objective is. Day and night game models were developed with the objectives of meeting large numbers of women with the eventual goals of numbers, date(s), and sex. But is this really the best way to go about finding something more substantial than casual lays? I don't think so, and here's why:
The standard models of approach game as we know them today---Day and Night game---are based on efficiency, persistence, and volume. In other words, if you approach enough girls with the right system, you will get dates, lays, and as time goes on, you will get better and better to the point where it is second nature. But these systems are not discriminatory in the right ways for meeting women with a very specific subset of qualities that would make a good girlfriend and eventually wife. I'm part of the small manosphere clan that actually thinks marriage has merit for a man if approached properly.
Approaching cold has no other qualification measures than physical appearance and interest level. You approach good-looking women, and if your game is tight and they have sufficient interest it will go somewhere. But beyond this, you know NOTHING about the girl. It is an inefficient use of your time to more or less blindly approach large numbers of women if your objective is to find one to ride shotgun with you in the long haul. For this, you need to have a clear framework of what you want without being so rigid you dont allow for individual stories and differences. I think this is an excellent framework to start with if you want--*gasp*--a wife.
Now this is NOT an excuse not to approach women. Quite the contrary. It is a rationale for more selectively approaching women based on your objective. So how do you tailor your approaches? Well, common sense really. You are going to need to focus on places where your ideal girl will be more likely to appear; which pretty much rules out bars and clubs. If we are going off Bold and Determine's criteria (which I agree with), you could theoretically meet these girls anywhere, but more likely places would be church, hobby groups, and volunteer organizations. Essentially day game approaches, but you will use more of an opportunistic rather than shotgun approach. With a clear framework in mind, you will naturally hone in on likely targets and these opportunities will become more evident.
I realize this is nothing earth-shattering, but sometimes I think we forget (or just don't know) exactly what our objective is. This can result in a lot of spinning your wheels and disillusionment. A few broad points I want to add:
-Most men aren't mentally or practically ready to consider marriage until they are past 30. They lack the wisdom and sheer experience with many different types of women to make an informed, self-actualized decision.
-In general, I recommend 5 solid years of gaming and dating before coming to this juncture, although everyone is different. 100 years ago this wouldn't really be an issue, but the playing field is vastly different now. It is not tilted in men's favor. Women are socially glorified and even rewarded for what was considered deplorable behavior in the past. Honest and well-meaning guys can get tooled in myriad ways if they don't have both awareness and experience.
-Make game fundamentals a part of your being. Embrace your alpha persona, constantly self-improve, have an acute understanding of the psycho-social dynamics of the sexual marketplace, develop sound confidence based on achievements, and have a well-rounded life.
-As most of us know, men age better than women, both physically and in terms of opposite-sex value, so if you build your life continually and take care of your body, you will only continue to advance in value. Don't let women convince you otherwise.
---------------
I notice that most game material is put forth with one unifying objective: to have sex with as many attractive women as possible, as efficiently as possible.
This is good in many ways, because it cuts through a lot of bullsh!t and gets to the nuts and bolts of game --the psychology, the action, and the most important thing of all, experience. Just like in the physical world, there are laws in male-female interactions and if you are aware of them you can achieve predictable results.
However, at a certain point for many guys this is no longer our objective. There is a point of diminishing returns where further lays and volume dating isn't yielding anything measurably positive to your life. If anything, you are just seeing patterns, not people, and some serious cynicism can ensue. I notice this especially in online dating, since patterns are more evident due to the standardized format.
As such, I've been reading a lot of day game material lately (due to my horrible deficiency in this area), and I got to thinking about what exactly my objective is. Day and night game models were developed with the objectives of meeting large numbers of women with the eventual goals of numbers, date(s), and sex. But is this really the best way to go about finding something more substantial than casual lays? I don't think so, and here's why:
The standard models of approach game as we know them today---Day and Night game---are based on efficiency, persistence, and volume. In other words, if you approach enough girls with the right system, you will get dates, lays, and as time goes on, you will get better and better to the point where it is second nature. But these systems are not discriminatory in the right ways for meeting women with a very specific subset of qualities that would make a good girlfriend and eventually wife. I'm part of the small manosphere clan that actually thinks marriage has merit for a man if approached properly.
Approaching cold has no other qualification measures than physical appearance and interest level. You approach good-looking women, and if your game is tight and they have sufficient interest it will go somewhere. But beyond this, you know NOTHING about the girl. It is an inefficient use of your time to more or less blindly approach large numbers of women if your objective is to find one to ride shotgun with you in the long haul. For this, you need to have a clear framework of what you want without being so rigid you dont allow for individual stories and differences. I think this is an excellent framework to start with if you want--*gasp*--a wife.
Now this is NOT an excuse not to approach women. Quite the contrary. It is a rationale for more selectively approaching women based on your objective. So how do you tailor your approaches? Well, common sense really. You are going to need to focus on places where your ideal girl will be more likely to appear; which pretty much rules out bars and clubs. If we are going off Bold and Determine's criteria (which I agree with), you could theoretically meet these girls anywhere, but more likely places would be church, hobby groups, and volunteer organizations. Essentially day game approaches, but you will use more of an opportunistic rather than shotgun approach. With a clear framework in mind, you will naturally hone in on likely targets and these opportunities will become more evident.
I realize this is nothing earth-shattering, but sometimes I think we forget (or just don't know) exactly what our objective is. This can result in a lot of spinning your wheels and disillusionment. A few broad points I want to add:
-Most men aren't mentally or practically ready to consider marriage until they are past 30. They lack the wisdom and sheer experience with many different types of women to make an informed, self-actualized decision.
-In general, I recommend 5 solid years of gaming and dating before coming to this juncture, although everyone is different. 100 years ago this wouldn't really be an issue, but the playing field is vastly different now. It is not tilted in men's favor. Women are socially glorified and even rewarded for what was considered deplorable behavior in the past. Honest and well-meaning guys can get tooled in myriad ways if they don't have both awareness and experience.
-Make game fundamentals a part of your being. Embrace your alpha persona, constantly self-improve, have an acute understanding of the psycho-social dynamics of the sexual marketplace, develop sound confidence based on achievements, and have a well-rounded life.
-As most of us know, men age better than women, both physically and in terms of opposite-sex value, so if you build your life continually and take care of your body, you will only continue to advance in value. Don't let women convince you otherwise.
Last edited: