organizedconfusion
Master Don Juan
Re: just for the record... ROLLO THOMASSI RESPONSE
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by organizedconfusion it's a component in a relationship, but theres much more in order to making it work...[/B]
And are you are basing your presumptions of this from the 'runaway' success of you "relationship" with the 12 year old or the one you had from age 17 to 20?
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by organizedconfusion it's a component in a relationship, but theres much more in order to making it work...[/B]
And are you are basing your presumptions of this from the 'runaway' success of you "relationship" with the 12 year old or the one you had from age 17 to 20?
That was my problem in the past though..i ALWAYS had to have the power in the relationship and seldom did i compromise or really listen to her needs entirly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps you'd like to enlighten us as to what the 'needs' of a 12 y.o. girl are and how they are similar to the 'needs' of an adult woman?
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i decided that after the last one and how hurt i was by it and how stubborn and set in my ways i can be, i must change things first in order to have better relationships..where most suffer from having no control, i suffered from wanting too much control over things.Being the dominate part and always insisting on things my way. Sure, it's an alpha trait or whatever you guys wanna call it, but it's only gotten me nothing but trouble in the past.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to your epmphatic testimony, your last 'real' relationship ended 5 years ago when you were 20 and began when you were 17 - I would assume immediately after your first 'real' LTR with the 12 y.o. Are you saying that in those five years you discovered that you needed to change your personality to better identify with and accomodate women? How many women have you been with in this 5 year stretch and how did they respond to this
new' approach? You haven't mentioned anything about your current personal life; could it be that the reason you feel so strongly about your prepubescent and adolscent 'dating' experiences is predicated on these being your only available frame of reference? If your understanding is as accurate as you profess, why then haven't you settled down, "ended the game" so to speak, with your soulmate at 25? One would think that a man such as yourself would have women lined up around the block to be pampered, romanced and "compromised" with.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have had plenty of experiances with woman and i know enough that alot of this PUA type stuff WILL get your foot in the door in terms of sex and the initial attraction phases of a short-term relationship...but in the long run , these tactics don't work forever. Intitial attraction is nothing like an emotional attatchment that has been built up through the years of trial and effort,good and bad times, thick and thin. Relationships last because of the effort that both parties contribute, and fail when they don't.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to my watch, you have 5 years of unverified experience. Running away from home and couch surfing at 15 doesn'tmake you an acredited marriage counselor. That said, I do agree with what you've posted here. PUA skills are like giving dynamite to children. You can indeed perfect a routine that will, with a certain degree of predictability get you laid and in the door. In fact I all too often post threads about the necessity to devlop the DJ mindset so as to avoid the pitfalls of relapsing into AFC mental schemas, ONEitis and passive supplication once guys are in the door. But what you've posted thus far smacks of just this very relapse. DJ mentality is positive masculinity, and this means living up to a woman's expectation of you to be the confident decision maker
The Law of Equal Value Contribution:
In order for a relationship to work in the long term, both people must contribute roughly equal amounts of value to the other person's life. If they don't, the person contributing more value will become dissatisfied because they know they could get more value in a relationship than they are getting. They will then subconsciously or consciously sabotage and destroy the relationship.
The Cardinal Rule of Relationships
In any relationship, whether familial, personal, romantic or business, the person with the most power is the one who needs the other the least.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
geez, holding back as in forcing yourself to
hold things back that you really want to share with her..or things you want to experiance with her but are too afraid to in fear of looking like a chump for doing it..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Things you really want to share with her such as? It's far too easy to be nebulous here. Being a DJ doesn't mean to live a 'false life', it's pretty self-evident that this will never work in the long term. Rather it's to remake yourself in a positive, genuine manner. The problem you have with this is that it doesn't fit in with your concept of patronizing and identifying with women in order for them to trade their intimacy for it.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
talk about things like when she says shes 'okay' when theres clearly something wrong, when she says leave me alone but really means 'hold me'...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course the other option is she does think you're a creep and want's to be left alone, but this interpretation never enters your consideration because you've been socialized to assume the feminine perspective.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Besides always better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How naively quaint and wrong. So essentially you're saying that if you could see the future and knew with %100 certainty that a woman would betray and leave you after 3 or 4 years you'd still begin the relationship?
Better to ask for forgivness than ask for permission.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Or how she likes your boy that continuously calls women “chicks” and “broads” or my favorite “stunts”.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And in the real world this'll be the guy she'll cheat on you with because he retains the confidence and identity you modify and throw away in order to 'compromise' for her. This guy doesn't compromise and for that your girlfriend will suck him off in his monster truck.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
oh give me a break with the mumbo jumbo about how all girls are attracted to those ridiculous arch-types... and girls do 'act' but it's not like it's a 24/7 deal with i suspect most guys are in hopes of meeting woman. mr.'alpha' when they're really mr.dorkos inside.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See, the problem with this logic is that 'most guys' are like you. They believe in the Soulmate Myth, they believe in the Savior Trap, they believe that the more they identify with a woman the strong their connection will be. They'll voluntarily surrender their ambitions and alter or discard any dream they had to merit her intimacy in order to escape this popularized notion that "they'll live a life of lonliness and quite desperation" into their old age and die unloved in some assisted living facility.
More guys are AFCs than are DJs courtesy of this constant state of feminization in western culture. This is why you rely on cliched one-liners pulled from what some teenage girl told you or the latest romantic comedy you wen to see with that girl you were trying to show your 'feminine side' to in the hopess that she'd appreciate this and want to fvck you. In fact far too many PUAs are themselves AFCs and only revert bact to this ince they do have a foot in the door.
DJ mentality is a slap in the face to guys like you because it forces you to confront these very ego-invested beliefs that you think 'ought' to be true, but aren't often evidenced in womens behaviors, so there is a seed of doubt. It's like telling a mother that they're not raisng their child right or you're not living your life correctly - it's very accusatory and self-judgmental and necessarily so. This is then perceived as arrogance and thus the AFC considers it an attack. The response to which is almost universally a rationalization for their own mindset and a seeking for a common affirmation from those AFC who'll agree with him.
__________________
"Why do my eyes hurt?"
"Because you've never used them before."