What You Hate Most About Cops!

[Francisco d'Anconia]

You'd think so. But when we have people out there that think criminals should be able to walk calmly away from the scene without fear of a police officer stopping them..it's very discouraging. Frightening, too.

Hmmm, you think that may be the reason why we have police officers???

 

[Bible_Belt]

I like cops better than these stupid anti-cop threads.

 

[~attrACTION~]

What is this, like the 5th "Cop-Hating" thread this week?

I am not sure why there is an underlying hatred for the law on this board - maybe a lot of you have criminal records or something? I am also bewildered that this thread has not yet been closed, because it really seems to be headed in the wrong direction.

Police officers are helpful people as long as you are on the right side of the law.

 

[martinshernwood]

As much as it pains me to post on a thread started by a troll...this sort of ignorance is even more of a disgrace.



Can't speak for every police officer to fit your ideals, wolf. These kinds of generalizations are dangerous.

So we went and burnt the thief's car. If you want Justis you need to get it yourself.

Oh, you're an arsonist. Does this mean that we should listen to you more carefully now? When convicted felons and seasoned career criminals share your perverted world view, it just may be a sign that you're on the wrong path in life.

That is my favorite thing in this world and they took it away from me.

No, YOU took that away from you. YOU broke the law, and YOU ran from the police. It's not a patrol officer's fault that you broke the law and made him give you a ticket. It's YOURS. Man up and take some f'ucking responsibility.

Started by a troll???!!! WTF! Just because Wolf is schooling you in the art of argumentation, doesn't mean that you have to find an excuse and blame it on me in a sad attempt to save face.

Calling other people trolls is a blatant flame-baiting tactic, and flame baiting is a characteristic of a troll. So, I'm not the one flame baiting, you are.

Hopefully some moderators will take a look at your history to determine if flame baiting is habitual, or if this was just an isolated incident. Seeing as though I just joined, I don’t have the experience when it comes to dealing with you to make that determination. I hope in the future you can find better ways of expressing your frustration when being argumentatively destroyed than labeling others who had nothing to do with your defeat.

Being called a troll is something I don't take lightly, so I would speak for most by asking you to CALM DOWN and stop making so many knee-jerk reactions in the face of defeat. We all know losing arguments hurts, but sinking to the low levels of NAME CALLING is no way to deal with the way you were absolutely dominated by Wolf.

 

[PRMoon]

Dude why are so many people hating on cops? If you don't like cops how bout you not call the police when your house is broken into or when some drunk jerk hits your ride and takes off or any of the other sh*t that can happen to you and the first thing that's suggested to you by your insurance company or bank or any one really is CALL THE POLICE. If you don't like them then see how far you make it without them.

I like cops. They're public servants and if you treat them with respect they in turn will treat you with respect. You think you're having a bad day because your boss is yelling at you? Try dealing with pointless domestic dispute calls and having to deal with drug dealers and prostitues every day. Cops have it tougher then just about anyone who isn't military and they don't get paid all that much money. Quit *****ing about them because everyone hates on them until they need them and then they complain that the cop isn't doing his job correctly. F*ck that, until you've spent a great deal of time with cops or are one yourself you have no idea what it's like to be in that position and you need to shut up.

 

[ValleyDJing]

I am not sure why there is an underlying hatred for the law on this board - maybe a lot of you have criminal records or something?

Its not that there's a lot of people hating on cops. Its mostly like 3 dudes (two of which are suspected of being the same person) who are starting all these threads and doing their best (albeit, they've been getting served at every which turn by Deaux) to back each other up and create exaggerated stories of how they or their brother's, friend's, sister's, mom's, boyfriend got screwed by the criminal justice system. In addition somehow because one cop abused his power, all cops not only deserve to be hated, but deserved to be exterminated, Adolph Hitler and the Jewish Holocaust style. Oh yes, and you're probably right about most of them having criminal records. Also, might I point out that most of these "examples" of cops misusing power, happens to be petty stuff like running a stop sign. They themselves however, have never stolen a doughnut from the krispy kreme shop they work at.

Its kinda like Jim Carrey on Liar Liar, when his secretary is like..."so and so is on line one, he's in trouble again and wants your legal advice" and Jim Carrey picks up the telephone and just screams "QUIT BREAKING THE LAW, *******!"

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

WHOA! Those are some longass responses, heh. I bet I can take each paragraph down with one sentence each, just for kicks. Let's see here...rather than debate you, I'll just summarize your points and let your outrageous world perspective speak for itself.

Translation: Criminals are not to blame for ending up in prison.

Now you tell me which choice will be easier on the tax payer? putting the guy in jail for the stupid helmet law, or letting him go?

Translation: Abolishing the judicial system makes more sense than holding criminals accountable for their actions.

basically, you have taken what I have said and distorted into something totally different. Your translations were not what I was saying at all. You suck as a translator, you suck at paraphrasing too.

You cant justify breaking a law by saying it helped you enforce another one!

Translation: Police officers break the law by using the tools the government gave them to help them enforce the law i.e., emergency lights and firearms.

If stopping at the stop sign means the criminal gets away, tough sh*t!!.

Translation: Police officers should no longer be allowed to engage in pursuits of criminals.

Let me ask you something deus, do you think our troops in Iraq should be shooting at insurgents in mosques first becuase it means it will help us win over their sooner?

Do you think we should go ahead and just blow up a mosque just becuase we suspect insurgents are using it to hide weapons as well as themselves becuase it means it will help us achieve our objective of winning the war?

Do you think we should resort to torture for interrogation purposes becuase it wil help us win the war? (Im not talking about sending POWs or enemy combatants over to Saudi Arabia for torture, Im talking about having united States personnel do it)

Do you think our troops should go to an insurgent infested city in Iraq, and round up all male Iraqis over the age of 13 and either sluaghter them all or imprison them just for being male and age 13 or older becuase it means it will help us defeat the insurgency faster?

Do you think we should round up all muslim citizens in the United States and put them into camps becuase it will guarantee that terrorists will have an even harder time making another 911?

As you can see, doing these things would help us beat the bad guys, but it would also be illegal. Just becuase it helps beat the bad guys does not make it okay to break the law.

So what are your answers to these questions deus?

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

If you don't like cops how bout you not call the police when your house is broken into or when some drunk jerk hits your ride and takes off or any of the other sh*t that can happen to you and the first thing that's suggested to you by your insurance company or bank or any one really is CALL THE POLICE. If you don't like them then see how far you make it without them.

bwahhhaaaaahaaaa!!!!

Alot of us have already done that only to find that cops dont do sh*t when we are the victims. This is one big reason why we hate cops; they dont do sh*t when you really need them, but they will be more than happy to go out of their way to fvck you over on something stupid like a minor traffic violation.

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

So what are your answers to these questions deus?

3 main questions to answer here.

1) Do I believe in using coerced interrogation on terrorists to extract information that will save thousands of lives?

2) Do I believe that exterminating those who murder innocent women and children in their sleep is the right thing to do, even if they're in a mosque?

3) Do I believe imprisoning terrorists is the right thing to do?

unbeleivable!!

You didnt even answer my questions! in fact, it looks like you have severely distorted them and reposted them.

I asked you if you agree we should be using torture to win the war in Iraq becuase it will stop the badguys even though such a move is illegal. United States personnel are not allowed to use torture, they use techniques that ignorant people would consider torture, but which are not. For example, the US is allowed to put a barking dog in a prisoner's face to scare him. Examples of things they cannot do: cut off a prisoner's fingers or toes to get him to talk. Do you agree that the United States should resort to these tactics to win despite that they are illegal?

I asked you if you think we should demolish a mosque just becuase it is under suspicion of harboring insurgents and weapons, but has not been proven to have such. To demolish a mosque based on suspicion alone is a violation of internationa laws of war, the mosque has not been proven to be invovled in combat, so to destroy it intentionally is to intentionally destroy property considered to not be involved in combat. that would be breaking the law.

I asked you if we should imprison muslim american citizens just becuase they are muslim alone becuase it will help prevent another 911. Its clear why this move would be considered illegal.

This is not a political post, Im using an example that is an analagy to what cops do that just happens to have a political nature. The analagy is that for United states to do these things would be illegal, but, however would help stop the bad guys. But this is very similar to what cops are already doing, breaking laws becuase it helps them stop the bad guys, and thats Bullsh*t!

You cant break the law even if it means stopping the bad guys! cops arent above the law.

 

[PRMoon]

bwahhhaaaaahaaaa!!!!

Alot of us have already done that only to find that cops dont do sh*t when we are the victims. This is one big reason why we hate cops; they dont do sh*t when you really need them, but they will be more than happy to go out of their way to fvck you over on something stupid like a minor traffic violation.

Nooo, they didn't do what YOU wanted them to do. Cops still work by their own means, not because you have your sense of justice and aren't satisfied by their actions and how they handle your situation. Since I'm friends with several policemen, tributed to the level of respect I've shown them (even my arresting officers) so they're more apt to help me out then others who whine about how they don't do anything productive even though they're the only thing preventing the real criminals from making your life a living hell.

What it really boils down to is you guys not understand how to work and work with people. You have to understand how cops work and what their thinking, then try to have them resolve your issues from there. You can easily get yourself out of a traffic violation if you know how to talk to the cop and weren't doing anything too wreckless. Likewise, it's just as easy to have a cop do follow up work on who vandalized your property or stole your car when speaking to them. There's a system and you're all pissed because you don't know how to have it work to your advantage and instead of trying to find ways to change that, you're content in wallowing in your helpless state and cry about how pissed you are. Its hard to believe these same people are preaching about how they use what is, for all intensive purposes, the same system you use to socilize with women sucessfully. And yet can see it in themselves to get out of parking ticket. How self contradictory and pathetic is that?

 

[martinshernwood]

we should start a thread just for Godofgettinglaid and Deus to argue all the time. That way every other thread on this forum wouldn't get polluted by these idiots.

 

[martinshernwood]

so the other day my friend jamal was pulled over for no particular reason other than "fitting a description"....yeah, we all know what description that is. :trouble:

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

No you're not. You're using a site for seducing women to advance your far-left agenda. You represent 6-8% of Americans, which is why nobody has stepped up to support you, and everyone here has put in their own reasons why they believe you are absolutely off your rocker.

and what far left agenda is that? the onlything close to far left that I have said is that cops suck large penises, thats about it.

You are applying the Geneva Convention to those who do not apply, as terrorists fight under no flag and are therefore not considered uniformed combatants. You are referencing a few isolated incidents with humilitiation tactics being used against detainees, and are equating that with standard United States policy. You are insinuating that it is standard protocol for our military to target mosques. You are too far gone to reason with, and you will never win over anybody on this thread. Save for Martin Shernwood perhaps.

so your saying it wont be illegal for the US to cut off the fingers of non uniformed combatants to get them to talk?

Um, putting a barking dog in a detainee's face is allowed and is one technique of many in interrogation. Our interrogation techniques are not limited to just sitting down at a table and asking questions. But they are limited to torture and inhumane techniques.

In none of my posts have I said its standard for the US to target mosques. THe US avoids targetting them, why? becuase mosques are considered property not involved in combat. But if they are known with certainty that they are being used for combat, the US will target them, and only under that condition!

Now quit sidestepping my questions and answer them:
1. should we chop off detainee's fingers if it means getting them to talk?
2. Should we target mosques when we arent sure if theyre actually being used for combat even though targetting them will help us win?
3. should we imprison all muslim american citizens just becuase they are muslim becuase it will help prevent another 911?

You agree that cops should be allowed to break the law becuase doing so will help them catch the bad guys. So then Im guessing your answer will be yes to all of these becuase they too break the law, yet stop bad guys. If your answers are yes (which Im sure they are), your wrong for that :nono: and your logic is fvcked!

and by the way, stop distorting what Im saying. Stop distorting the questions I am asking you and go ahead and just answer them! I know Ive got your cornered, thats why you are avoiding answering my questions

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

we should start a thread just for Godofgettinglaid and Deus to argue all the time. That way every other thread on this forum wouldn't get polluted by these idiots.

yep, you are definitely El Febreezy da Beez. isnt posting under several names considered trolling the forum? isnt that worthy of a bann? hey mods, come here, I got something for ya!!!!!

 

[God_of_getting_layed]

No. Not because you're a radical leftist and thus impossible to reason with, and not because I've already answered them...but rather because I refuse to let you drag me into a political debate. You saw that everyone disagrees with you about police officers, and are not trying to take your ball and go home by getting the thread closed. Doesn't work like that.

You agree that cops should be allowed to break the law becuase doing so will help them catch the bad guys.

Never said that. Disagree? Show me the quote.

Stop distorting the questions I am asking you and go ahead and just answer them!

I trim the sugarcoated bullѕhit to make your claims easily read. If I lost something in translation, name something specifically and SUCCINTLY and we shall see about a correction being issued. Answered them already, you just don't like what the answer is.

Um, you didnt answer them. An answer is not rewriting the questions differently, the answers to my quesions are "yes" or "no" answers. Please show me your yes/no answers to my questions, becuase I cant seem to find them. :rock:

yep, I got you cornered. You cant answer my questions becuase doing so will either make you seem like the very thing Im saying cops are, or it will cause you to contridict yourself depending on which answers out of the possible answers you give me. So no matter what answers you give to my questions, its a losing situation for you. Your cornered! and I won!

 

[Mandiblard]

Agreed, this kid is acting like a baby, someone please lock this filth.

 

[martinshernwood]

I agree as well, God of getting defeated needs to grow up. Also, this thread isn't about your political agenda, it's about police officers and why people "hate" them. I'm trying to figure out why people dislike cops so much; I have my reasons, what are other peoples'?

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Just to stir things up...

http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070123/BREAKINGNEWS/70123006/1086

 

[martinshernwood]

Just to stir things up...

http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070123/BREAKINGNEWS/70123006/1086

hahaha. Nice find Francisco.

 

[martinshernwood]

I'm suprised god of getting laid isn't using that article to back up his claims. :box: