Ken785
Master Don Juan
i wanna go back in time and live in the 80s again...and see how different things were...that would rock! Back to the future was a great movie!
What an idiot. Democracy is bullsh1t when most of the population is a composed of idiots.Danger said:Voting for the candidate that best represents you is never a waste.
Idealistic but untrue. There should be a 3+ party system, but the way it is now, third parties are meaningless in the presidential elections.Danger said:Voting for the candidate that best represents you is never a waste.
It doesn't matter how good-looking you are, how romantic you are, how funny you are... or anything else. If she doesn't have something INVESTED in you and the relationship, preferably quite a LOT invested, she'll dump you, without even the slightest hesitation, as soon as someone a little more "interesting" comes along.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
DUDE! i suggested that already...scroll up.joekerr31 said:all youd have to do is what they did in back to the future. get a book that tells you who won every baseball and football game and you'd be a billionaire in no time.
yeah but you know what that means...you would have to live in that time then...because if you go back to the present whose name is that investment going to be under? yourself? were you even born yet? and if you were to approach your parents they would probably think you were a crazy man and have the police come and put you in an asylum! Then you'd be really fvcked..put in an asylum...and an asylum in the past at that! Nobody would believe you are from the future!Kev07 said:You know, I'd definetely go get a million dollar loan, and dump it into Apple when it first came out.
but if you did go back have molest yourself youd instantly have an attitude change because you are changing your future/present self at that time...just like if you killed your child self you'd instantly disappear because your future self would no longer exist...joekerr31 said:what if a child molester was able to go back in time and he went back in time and molested himself.
then the child him would grow up with the sole purpose of killing his older self who molested him.
BUT, when the child him became an adult he would become the adult him which would mean that he would do what his adult self did and travel back in time and molest the child version of himself.
hmmmm.
i think im going to pitch this to fox.
does anyone have an email address for the producers of tv shows at fox?
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
it could follow "to catch a prediter"joekerr31 said:what if a child molester was able to go back in time and he went back in time and molested himself.
then the child him would grow up with the sole purpose of killing his older self who molested him.
BUT, when the child him became an adult he would become the adult him which would mean that he would do what his adult self did and travel back in time and molest the child version of himself.
hmmmm.
i think im going to pitch this to fox.
does anyone have an email address for the producers of tv shows at fox?
This is what is called a "Grandfather's Paradox". If you went back in time and killed your child self, then your child self wouldn't be able to grow up, get in the time machine, and kill his younger self. Similarly, if you went back and killed a young version of your grandfather, then he wouldn't have been able to have your father/mother, who wouldn't have been able to have you, and you wouldn't be able to go back and kill him. Pretty ****ed up, but interesting to think about nonetheless.Ken785 said:but if you did go back have molest yourself youd instantly have an attitude change because you are changing your future/present self at that time...just like if you killed your child self you'd instantly disappear because your future self would no longer exist...
Cowhead418 said:This is what is called a "Grandfather's Paradox". If you went back in time and killed your child self, then your child self wouldn't be able to grow up, get in the time machine, and kill his younger self. Similarly, if you went back and killed a young version of your grandfather, then he wouldn't have been able to have your father/mother, who wouldn't have been able to have you, and you wouldn't be able to go back and kill him. Pretty ****ed up, but interesting to think about nonetheless.
ketostix said:Right but what never made sense to me is under that view of time travel, ie, when you go back you would find your past self. So in the past you have the "future" you and the past you existing side by side. So what if the future you bought the winning lottery ticket before the drawing and went back to the future to cash it in, would the lottery ticket disappear when you leave the past/arrive in the future since the past you never actually bought that number?
I know this all just theoretical/philosophical, it's kind of fun to ponder. But what would happen if you did something to your past self, that caused you to either not make the time machine? Would the instant you interact with your past self and do whatever leads to the change make the time machine disappear, leaving you stuck in the past with 2 selfs? lol. What if you killed your pastpast self What I'm getting at is even if time travel was possible I don't think there would be any grandfather paradoxes if there can be 2 selfs existing at the same time.