No. Norway is capitalist country with a lot of social programs. Social programs do not imply socialism.
You should read the communist manifesto, it's short. It's obvious from the answers that most people have no clue what either system is.
Marx and Engles themselves said in the Communist manifesto that communism is the utopian end goal of socialism where private property does not exist. Communism has technically never existed, and it never will because Socialism does not work in the real world.
Socialism is when the government owns the means of production instead of private citizens. Most countries have a mixed model where some items are government run and others are private.
Indeed. Public services like universal healthcare, progressive marginal taxes, regulations to protect public health, worker safety, the environment, allowance of unions and collective bargaining, and so on - these are policies on the left wing of capitalism (social liberalism, social democracy, paternalistic conservatism), but they are not "socialist".
You are right that most people in this thread have absolutely no clue what either communism or socialism is, but socialism as an umbrella term isn't when the state controls the economy either, that's
statism - a term that you'll also see austrian economists use. The specific form of socialism that advocates for temporary or permanent state control of the economy is called just that - state socialism. Every human association is 'governed' in some way, but not every form of government is a 'state'.
But socialism itself is an umbrella term for a number of anti-capitalist movements that are based in positive liberty (freedom is the ability to control decisions and consequences to the extent they affect you) and class conflict, and disagree with each other on both how to reach a post-capitalist society and what that society might look like. That's why the communists under Stalin undermined the anarchists (libertarian socialists) in Revolutionary Catalonia for example, even though they're both "socialist". It's why "democratic socialists" started calling themselves that, to distance themselves from the state socialists that took over in the Soviet Union and started persecuting the other socialist factions. It's why Marx and the communists excluded the anarchists (libertarian socialists) from the Second Socialist International.
The wikipedia page on socialism is great for understanding, if you want an accurate idea. I know that's too much to ask for the willfully ignorant, who proudly keep their minds closed on purpose, but from your writing I can tell you probably aren't one of them.