What happened to the assault weapons ban

Status
Not open for further replies.

( . )( . )

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
4,875
Reaction score
177
Location
Cobra Kai dojo
Danger said:
Bradd,

There is no rearguing here, merely pointing out why I (and many others) will NO LONGER debate you.

What is the point of debating you, when you engage in the following?

You "threaten to delete three different people who disagree with you".
Make that 4. Speed Dawg not only had his well thought out post defending me and pointing out the holes in brads leftist based theories he was threatened with a ban. Then proceeds to shut down the thread.

I knew this was going to end up the same way last weeks Phil Robertson thread ended up. What a joke.
 

( . )( . )

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
4,875
Reaction score
177
Location
Cobra Kai dojo
bradd80 said:
His comment in that thread was deleted because he launched an unnecessary personal attack out of nowhere.
Nice try but I saw his post before you promptly deleted it. He not only pointed out YOUR ad hominems used toward me but also blew holes in all your flakey arguments. His post was more than civil.
 

( . )( . )

Banned
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
4,875
Reaction score
177
Location
Cobra Kai dojo
bradd80 said:
Don't worry Tits the mods and other posters here at SS are perfectly aware of how "civil" Speed Dawg's comments are. You're also a poster who's known for launching unnecessary personal attacks, so I completely understand why you would defend the right of others to do the same.
Denial. Not just a river in Egypt.

Speed dawg sure as hell didn't in that Phil Robertson thread and you know it. Like I said he was pointing out YOUR weak shaming tactics and ad hominem attacks toward me.
 

Vantagepoint34

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
869
Reaction score
79
Location
Land of slow.
bradd80 said:
Don't worry Tits the mods and other posters here at SS are perfectly aware of how "civil" Speed Dawg's comments are. You're also a poster who's known for launching unnecessary personal attacks, so I completely understand why you would defend the right of others to do the same.

Anyways Danger I had no idea you were this angry by our debate. Perhaps you and Tits should both take internet forum discussions a little less seriously.

Debate? This is a little one sided here. The Ent suggest it's one sided :cheer:
 

Vantagepoint34

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
869
Reaction score
79
Location
Land of slow.
Hear ye, Hear ye. All thee who have lost in thy debate should be forced to watch 49ers vs Greenbay tomorrow and forced to pick a side. To further solve our differences.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,107
Reaction score
5,740
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
bradd80 said:
I cannot let the two of you constantly launch personal attacks and discuss issues that have nothing to do with a thread topic.
That rule must be new :confused: Weren't you and I talking about drugs earlier on this same thread?
 

Vantagepoint34

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
869
Reaction score
79
Location
Land of slow.
Funny I introduced two of my buddies to the forumns not too long ago. They resolved their issues from way back in high school in a day. I'm glad I asked them to join. One of them works at a Hunter's store as we speak.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top