jt4aa -- yes, okay, definitions can be limiting, but this is a thought experiment. People today say there is a shortage of "real men" and what exactly they mean by this and what is their definition is my concern here -- and mostly bred out of curiosity and a discussion with my lady about "man" or "woman", ect, ect. Any university has a handful of classes at least on sex and gender, ect, ect -- these are loose terms and we all know there are fuzzy lines (especially when dealing with homosexuality...there are more "effeminate men, more masculine men, ect"...in some ways trying to define anything into some form of absolute is risky business...nothing can really be held so simply between two fingers...but there is nothing wrong with thought exploration and reflection..these are the tools to great things..
Jitterbug -- righteous poetry -- sounds absolutely beautiful and I love it. Themes of great strength, resolve, perseverance, leadership, respect, honor, courage -- these are characteristics most would say "real men" possess. In some ways, our worlds of cubicle-living and limited mobility make it hard to be the hatchet swinging warrior that native societies may have had, or the furrowed browed explorer from western worlds moving through the thicket fearlessly...
In some ways our society has sort of turned us all into drones..but that does not mean real leadership cannot be expressed (even if it is in the setting of an office) -- or even more so, in the setting of a relationship or in a family or in times of crisis (people sick, hurt, ect).
This is good stuff to think about. I appreciate the replies.