What are women for?

[SamePendo]

What is their place? What should you expect from a woman? What should you look for in a woman?


FYI. Prior to making this post, I have been absent for the site for a long while, and I've had only sporadic visits here and there for some time now.


I don't know where I got this example, but I always use it. "In the times of cavemen":
The men hunted, and the women stayed at home and nourished. The man risks himself out there, risks his life. He has to come up with ways to beat some other guy from having his food sometimes, etc etc. And women stay at home, give the kids to eat, worry about the husband, etc.

Well, that is still the case, and will always be, right? In an animalistic point of view. I mean, this doesn't mean women can't do what men can do, but they have to put 200% the effort, and sometimes, even then, they can't. I personally think that they have all the right to pursue whatever they want to do, same as men. But really, they can hardly beat a man. Yeah ofcourse they can "beat" a ordinary joe at something in work. But an extraordinary woman is prone to lose against an extraordinary man. In areas men are supposed to be in, like, real jobs, not flipping burgers.

Anyone in sales knows that women can only "sell" to some extent. They can flash their boobies, and say those memorized lines etc, but can't compare to a man. They can't sell ****.

What does a woman have to offer?

a) Her body.
b) Her nourishing abilities.

Anything else?

Now, if you are looking for a serious relationship, and by serious, I mean you look for someone who could be the mother of your children... I personally would look for the woman who has had less sex activity, or none. Why? Because I don't want the mother of my children to have had it up the ass by some other dude(s). I think sex is like fire, and it is very easy to skip the line of love-making, to just lust, sex. But that's just me.

On point... least sex activity or none at all. As young as can be, less fvcked up in the head, still fresh, still optimistic. One who is athletic, and as hot as can be. With a supporting family.

Now, what are you currently looking for?
a) Her body (sex).
b) Her nourishing abilities (ltr).

What should you do?
Have sex with as many women as you can, in a healthy manner, in both cases. You are a man. You are aggressive. You have to go out there to the world and catch some fvcking tiger. You get scars and ****. You want to have sex, luckily for us you can have lots of sex and not get any b!tch pregnant, or get some STD! :rockon:
Really, if you don't fvck them, they'll fvck someone else!
Your morality gets in the way?
Really, how does fvcking a girl affect one? Really? And if you DO fvck her, you'll be all good, relaxed, ready for more, inspired, with energy to go hunt down some fvcking lion.
If you're not a virgin:
Think about what you thought about sex before you had sex.
Now what do you think about sex after having sex?

So yes, in my case, my thought is: if you are looking for a ltr, still fvck all the women you can/want to. While doing so, if I cross with a woman with my requirements, and I'm ready to be a provider, great. If not, I'll fvck her and on with it.

Just don't get stuck on looking to fvck as many women as possible. Yes you're a man, and you must hunt! And by hunt I mean get some money. As much as you can. Get the money for your own satisfaction, not to get the hottest pvssy. You CAN use the money and get some of the hottest pvssy out there, but:
a) Getting the hottest pvssy doesn't equal happiness.
b) Money should be used to (buy) the tools to (make, build) happiness.

I'm not trying to sound woman-hating. Please don't get that impression, that's why I made the fyi at the beggining.

Thoughts?

 

[KontrollerX]

"What is their place?"

Partying, getting drunk, slvtting around, shopping for expensive sh!t they don't need.

"What should you expect from a woman?"

Absolutely nothing other than partying with them and sex.

"What should you look for in a woman?"

Skin free of cuts and needle track marks/vein damage etc.

 

[SamePendo]

Comedy comes from observation of the world. Presented in a humorous way. The best jokes often are those which are a mirror of sorts. What I'm saying is that you're right!

I was in a bus the other day, and, thinking about the subject, a dog came into my thoughts. A dog is considered "man's best friend". And I thought, well, women are in some ways even better. They are dogs which we find attractive.

Now, comparing women to dogs can be demeaning. And I'm not necessarily wanting to demean women. But, sometimes, in order to understand women, and the "world" around them, you have to think of them as if they were another species. As Pook said, "there is no riddle".
Figuring out women is like figuring out why a dog runs around in circles chasing it's own tail.

The best thing about a dog is that you don't expect unrealistic things from a dog. No matter how much movies and tv you've watched, you're not expecting a dog to talk, or to have contact with alien technology which could make you rich. You grow to love a dog (or whatever your pet of choice is) because of what they grow to be. Because of the relationship that builds between the two of you. You don't expect your dog to get you a job, or to make that special deal happen. So you aren't dissapointed.
But, with women, it's another story. You expect things to be like in tv. You expect a woman to really change your life around. You believe what you see on tv. Expecting a woman to change your life, and many other things, is like expecting a dog to talk. So you get disappointed.
This is, I feel, the purpose of this thread.

Maybe I (finally) see things in technicolor. As they are.

This site is a tool, a great tool. But, it comes to a point where guys are analizing the dog chasing its tail. It is what it is.

Now, the message, my message, isn't to look as women as sex objects. The nourishing abilities covers a whole lot. And it isn't to make less of them. And, to not love them. Have you ever missed from the bottom heart a pet? Cried over one? LOVED them from the bottom of your heart? Well, now imagine that with another human being? It can be great.

Aim high. But to aim high with women you must aim high with yourself, as a man. And, don't expect a woman to be a man with boobs.

Ah, those lucky gay guys!

 

[edger]

slvtting around

You guys tend to throw this premise around that women "sl*t around" a lot, yet, how come none of these so-called "sl*ts" are jumping on my d*ck? I'm going home alone every weekend for f*cksake, lol. This is why I think this premise is bullsh*t. Sure, maybe the unattractive ones do(in hopes that by putting out to any guy, they'll be more likely to get guys), but I'm absolutely sure most of the attractive ones are super picky and won't sleep with just any guy, otherwise, I should be getting laid by attractive women regularly. Or I should say, as in my case, even as a decent looking guy with decent game, they still won't jump on your d*ck.

 

[Bible_Belt]

What is their place? What should you expect from a woman? What should you look for in a woman?


She should have a good job and pay all of my bills. I am worth it.

 

[Levex]

At this point...saving us from a global economic meltdown. Can you imagine what would happen if women stopped buying all the useless crap they usually buy? We'd have a 30% unemployment rate.

 

[ketostix]

Well I don't see women as a dog. I seem them more as mischievious children in adult bodies. When they're outside of their proper-place, cooking, cleaning and nurturing kids and family-all kinds of mischief ensues.

Edger, I agree with you to an extent. Females aren't "sluts" in the sense that they don't want quanity of partners and won't sleep with just anyone like men will. This should be obvious as daylight to any guy looking at reality. So in that sense they're not "sluts". But you know about the 80/20 theory. 80% of women are sleeping with 20% of the men. These women have to know they're fvcking the same guys. So in that sense they are "sluts", and also because they are willing to reject a guy who will commit for a guy they have to know it's just about sex. But if women were truely "sluts" in the sense they wanted sex with variety in partners like men do, then they would have to be spreading the sex around more than thy do.

In order for women to be sluts for a guy he has to be at the top percentage level. It's kind of like money, someone who can make money, funny enough also translates in the top 10-20% or so, tries to take it all. Is money or women easy? It all depends on if your in the top percentrage or not. How easy it is for one group is almost inversely porportional to another. I'm not saying whether it's right or wrong or fair/unfair, just saying that is how it works out.

 

[Da Realist]

Wow, you all have some harsh views on women. It would be interesting to see how you all think about your moms, sisters, or any other female relatives.

 

[Guoy Darko]

Wow, you all have some harsh views on women. It would be interesting to see how you all think about your moms, sisters, or any other female relatives.

True. Why should men f*ck around as much as possible, but when a woman does this, she's a total *****? It doesn't make sense. You guys sound like those old fashioned arabic dudes, who think it's okay to kill a women when she betrays her family by having a boyfriend, but think it's okay for her brother to f*ck around as much as possible.

 

[ketostix]

Wow, you all have some harsh views on women. It would be interesting to see how you all think about your moms, sisters, or any other female relatives.

Hey, if my mom was a feminist (she's not) or any other female relative was, I wouldn't agree with them either. Female relatives are irrelevant because females generally behave well toward male genetic relatives and act like mercenaries toward male non-relatives. I'm not one of the posters who think all women should be or are just slvts, hors, etc, but I still think they have a proper place. And if you think they have a harsh view on women here, I don't think you really know how harsh women view men.

 

[Da Realist]

Hey, if my mom was a feminist (she's not) or any other female relative was, I wouldn't agree with them either. Female relatives are irrelevant because females generally behave well toward male genetic relatives and act like mercenaries toward male non-relatives. I'm not one of the posters who think all women should be or are just slvts, hors, etc, but I still think they have a proper place. And if you think they have a harsh view on women here, I don't think you really know how harsh women view men.

I get what you're saying, but it still sounds like you have a bit of a condescending attitude about women. Children in adult bodies? C'mon now. My view from my own life experiences is that a man has to learn to expect a woman to be even with him to have have a good relationship or even just to get a date. When I say even, I mean that a woman doesn't have the same stuff you have, but balances what you got. The guy who this site is emulating understood that a man can't come across as a master to a woman, but be that thing she's missing. A woman knows the same thing. So as far as what women are good for, I just say whatever you're not good at. Maybe they can't chop down a tree like us, but they can use that wood to cook you a mean dinner. Maybe she can't make a chair like you, but she looks good sitting in it. On the flip side, to her you making the chair is a turn on. So, I just say don't hate them, and don't hold them over or under you; just get a good one that will compliment you. But I will leave you with this: the way a person sees people really determines how the person is.

 

[edger]

Da Realist, Guoy Darko, I agree with you 100%. When I said the word "slut", I wasn't implying it in a negative light. I just used that term because it's what's being used in this conversation. I'm always the first one around here to defend women who are promiscous, everyone knows that about me. It is natural for a human being to be promiscous, man or woman. As natural as a need for water. There is a terrible double standard that sadly still exists, in that, a man can sleep with numerous women, but if a woman does that, she's ridiculed and coined as a "slut". There is no logic in that at all. "Slut" by definition is a promiscous woman, but the word itself, when it's used, has become used in a demeaning way. I don't even use it AT ALL, because of all the negativity it has aquired over the yrs, so I've altogether eliminated it from my vocabulary.

 

[Bass-Turd]

Next thread

"what are men for?"

a)Their d1cks?
b)Their strength?

News at 11

 

[FireOnTheMountain]

Welcome to 1850, guys!

 

[I.A.F.Y.B.]

Creation of life and a companion.

 

[SamePendo]

Welcome to 1850, guys!

Well, I was comparing this to caveman times, but, oh well.

I made a similar post some time ago. This time, it isn't a statement, it's a question, guided to ones relationship with women. What should one expect?

We are not the same. That should be more than clear. As a poster stated previously, they may not make a chair like one can, but they look pretty sitting on it. We are not the same. We sometimes fall into expecting a woman to be a man with boobs, and that's a mistake. Whether we are better that them or not, isn't relevant. The question is, what should we expect from women?

 

[edger]

We are not the same. We sometimes fall into expecting a woman to be a man with boobs, and that's a mistake.

I was talking to an aquaintance of mine near my job who's around 59. Supposedly, according to him, he has a lot of experience under his belt with women/attractive women. According to him, the only difference between men and women, is that, women have boobs and a vagina. I don't know what the hell he's talking about, but yet again, I guess everyone has a different experience with women.

 

[(JJ)]

Da Realist, Guoy Darko, I agree with you 100%. When I said the word "slut", I wasn't implying it in a negative light. I just used that term because it's what's being used in this conversation. I'm always the first one around here to defend women who are promiscous, everyone knows that about me. It is natural for a human being to be promiscous, man or woman. As natural as a need for water. There is a terrible double standard that sadly still exists, in that, a man can sleep with numerous women, but if a woman does that, she's ridiculed and coined as a "slut". There is no logic in that at all. "Slut" by definition is a promiscous woman, but the word itself, when it's used, has become used in a demeaning way. I don't even use it AT ALL, because of all the negativity it has aquired over the yrs, so I've altogether eliminated it from my vocabulary.

i disagree. yea there is a double standard, but i really honestly get the feeling it is an innate thought process deep rooted within our minds. You can sit there all day and say that you don't like the word "slut" or whatever. The fact of the matter is that, at the end of the day, I don't want to come home to some girl that has had 20, 30, 40+ dudes fvcking her. It's gross. And maybe you disagree with me there, which is fine. You occupy a special niche if you do. But I'm not gonna hate. You're gonna get one of the sluts that I don't want out of my way

 

[mackdaddy27]

"What is their place?"

Partying, getting drunk, slvtting around, shopping for expensive sh!t they don't need.

"What should you expect from a woman?"

Absolutely nothing other than partying with them and sex.

"What should you look for in a woman?"

Skin free of cuts and needle track marks/vein damage etc.

done //thread perfectly in 3 sentences

 

[Sir Juanalot]

Dogs are better than women.

If you lock your dog in your car boot for 30 minutes, its still happy to see you when you open it