What’s with this “Channing Tatum/ Bradd Pitt” nonsense used as “examples”.

[POFNinja]

What's with this "Channing Tatum / Bradd Pitt" nonsense used as "examples" of why dudes may not get a chicks number etc?

Do any of you actually leave your houses and see every hot chick with a “Channing Tatum/ Bradd Pitt”?

Do you actually believe every chick out there hot or not are with “ChanningTatum /Bradd Pitt” types their entire lives?

No one believes that nonsense. It’s simply a “face saving” excuse for not being wanted by a particular chick or chicks and not wanting to improve yourself but staying in a self-defeating "comfort zone".

Chicks are more likely to be struck by lightning then to land some “Channing Tatum/ Bradd Pitt” who could have anyone with a much higher social status and looks than some regular hot chick.

Now I understand they serve as examples, but it’s not realistic and will only serve to bring everyday dudes down on themselves.

There’s countless hot chicks out there attracted to different types, races, kinds etc. of dudes that they have their own reasons for liking. To them even a dude who you can’t believe the chick is with is her “Channing Tatum / Bradd Pitt” though they in reality may not be anywhere NEAR a dude like “Channing Tatum / Bradd Pitt” in status, looks, personality, fame etc.

They key is for you to be the best version of yourself you can be, groom and dress your best, keep plugging along, stay positive, don’t be outcome dependent, be socially free, and a good dude, not an a-hole nor a pushover.

You might just find yourself one day being the “Channing Tatum / Bradd Pitt” to some hot chick where other dudes will be thinking: “WTF is she doing with him?!" Instead of thinking of yourself as "less than" X famous dude.

 

[Fireballs]

Would Channing Tatum/Brad Pitt make a thread like this?

 

[TheMonkeyKing]

They key is for you to be the best version of yourself you can be, groom and dress your best, keep plugging along, stay positive, don’t be outcome dependent, be socially free, and a good dude, not an a-hole nor a pushover.

You might just find yourself one day being the “Channing Tatum / Bradd Pitt” to some hot chick where other dudes will be thinking: “WTF is she doing with him?!" Instead of thinking of yourself as "less than" X famous dude.

Ninjaninja actually did another good one.

 

[Maximus Rex]

Look Up the Word, "Analogy"

Dude, it's an analogy and the reason why Brad Pitt and Channing Tatum are used is because they're universally recognized celebrities that chicks across the broad find attractive, and normally they wouldn't try f*ckery on them that would on regular dudes. The example is used to gauge a chick's interest level. You can assume that women wouldn't subject RSD gurus to their f*ckery either because their frame is so strong.

 

[Dhoulmagus]

It is supposed to test for high interest, but I think it is more a blunt realization that your girl is either not interested or cheating on you.

 

[hudpes]

Maximus Rex, I don't agree. The analogy is used, because those guys are presumably knee deep in pvssy and don't take sh!t from women, they know they're hot stuff, have a ton of options and act like they don't care, because they don't. Women treat them differently, that is true, but that's not the point. Also, not all women treat them as if they're made of diamonds, rest assured they meet lots of equals, but they still act the same way, and that's why they score even with those.

 

[nismo-4]

It is a gauge of interest so time isn't wasted on an uninterested chick. Men shouldn't waste time on low interest chicks anyway.

 

[El Payaso]

Humble Ninja posting under a different account as usual...

 

[Maximus Rex]

Don't Make That Assumption

they know they're hot stuff, have a ton of options and act like they don't care, because they don't. Women treat them differently, that is true, but that's not the point.

You can't make that assumption. Often times these are the biggest betas going because they have no game. Take for example Sir Paul McCartney. I don't know if McCartney ever f*cked around on Linda, but when it came to her, he definitely had some b*tch made tendencies. Though she had no musical talent whatsoever, he let her play the tambourine in Wings. Knowing damn well that she couldn't sing, McCartney let Linda "sing," on stage, even though her mic was never plugged in, and when she found out, (instead of checking her ass,) McCartney let's her yell at him.

You hear over and over again, (especially with professional athletes,) on how they get into these f*cked up situations with women, that a dude with even the most rudimentary knowledge of game would never get themselves into.

Also, not all women treat them as if they're made of diamonds, rest assured they meet lots of equals, but they still act the same way, and that's why they score even with those.

This is true if these dudes are naturals with women, however if they're not, you can best believe that they're conforming to the social narrative as it pertains to courtship. Hell, you can probably imagination the chode sh*t these dudes are engaging in simply because they have the cash to indulge these broads Disney fantasies.

When Dave Justice wanted to meet Halle Berry, he sent flowers via a publicist. When Ice T wanted to meet Co Co, he sent his bodyguard in after her when she went to the bathroom. Then of course there's Chris Brown and Tiger Woods. These dudes wouldn't know the first thing about cold approach pickup because they never had to do it.

 

[Mr Wright]

Celebrities still get shot down by girls. I've heard of Usher having some chick walking off on him as they were about to get into his car. Go figure.

 

[Kailex]

It's a barometer, the apex of "men" if you will.

Many women would easily pass you up for a Channing Tatum, because he is a sex symbol due to looks, perceived status, and financial condition.

I've been with women who have actually told me in the past, "I'm out of it today, I wouldn't even bang Hugh Jackman right now, well... maybe I would make the sacrifice."

It happens, to ALL of us.

If Channing Tatum/Brad Pitt is nonsense, then the HB10 theoreticals should be just as nonsensical... but sorry, every thing in life that has some sort of competition will always have some sort of measuring stick.

It's just the way life is.
Deal with it, Ninja.

 

[Peaks&Valleys]

The problem here is that most quality chicks, regardless of their interest level, aren't going to be blowing up your phone the minute after they meet you. Sometimes it takes a little persistence along with confidence on the man's part. A girl may be 50/50 into you, or unsure of you, but have some interest. Therefore for those times, it's up to the MAN to take the lead and set something up that's convenient for the both of you. You should be able to recognize signs of flat out disinterest and Attention Whoring, however, with time, you'll realize that QUALITY chicks actually have lives, and they aren't always immediately available to return a text 24/7. They should get back to you in a reasonable amount of time of course, but there are situations when she can't. DON'T BE A NEEDY B1TCH, who goes off on a chick just because it took her 12 hours to return your text. Recognize a situation for what it is, they're all different. Sometimes a little perseverance works......sometimes.

The "would she do that to Brad Pitt" analogy has it's purpose, and it used to prove a point. HOWEVER, there's a time and a place for it. And it should be used sparingly. IMO anyways.