We Need To Change the Scale of 1-10...to...

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,516
Reaction score
44
5 by 5. Or course if you're evaluating her SOLELY on looks, 1-10, or even 5 is fine, but 10? Are we THAT picky? Come on. Who can define a 10, 9, 8 anyways? Normally what makes a 10, a 10, is lastly, her personality. And because men are supremely visual, we default that way, but we unfortunately give women credit for only 1/2, and the half that matters less. Here's how my 5 by 5 system works.


Physical , There's 5 levels.

1 = complete dog, fat, and unfortunate slob who probably doesn't care about her APPEARANCE. (this girl might smoke, drink, do drugs, or other vices which keep her down here, too)
2 = a slight boost here. perhaps enormous boobs, or a decent face, but still yucko.
3 = you would do her. she's average tho. the normal chick who's 10-20lbs over her ideal weight. busty n curvy.
4 = attractive. has the eyes, the look, the butt/boobs combo. not model perfect, but she's at the top 10% of women. she could do side modeling.
5 = supreme. this is your IDEAL, #1, gotta have her woman. maybe she's superstar status, or she just makes you creme looking at her. she exudes sex, and even in bang around clothes, she's unbelievable.

Mental/Personality

1 = a bytch, negative, evil, and proud of it. white trash. classless. Jerry Springer Material. Trail park product.
2 = tolerable, but she's like an XGF to you. she doesn't initiate a bad attitude, but if you communicate or disturb her, she's useless and gross.
3 = average. a mute. probably doesn't say much. Still asleep at the wheel. May seek to please everyone, but you can't grasp who she is, so you don't know if she's good or evil.
4 = a fun girl. great to be around. sexually confident. mentally healthy and stable. maybe a flaw, or too. but all round, cool. probably would fit as a female friend.
5 = gf/wife material. caring, funny, supportive, confident, sexual, mentally stable, no vices or addictions, no baggage (or doesn't let it effect her life), has a grasp on reality, fits YOUR ideals of a woman, is her own person (no what society wants).

NOW add, them together. What do you get?

If you have a SUPER hot girl who's a BYTCH, then she's a 6. ON a mental scale, you can evaluate clearly whether it's worth sweating or not, AND realize if she's unique OR not. Hot BYTCHES are by no means unique; they're a dime a dozeon, I don't care how many Chanel earrings, Manolo's or LV bags she has. Just because she has a NICE car, doesn't mean she treats it right or knows how to drive it correctly.

To spin lots of 5's and 6's doesn't take much but hard work; that's like having lots of mediocre prospects in sales. However, to have lots of TRUE 7's-10's, does take good effort and skills, and, it demonstrates the quality of man, because game recognizes game. A good man sees a good woman, both are normally attracted to 1 another. Scoring with vapid, sand-dead brained women isn't indicative of a man with selfconfidence problems because he has to prey on the dregs of society, rather than score someone who will test him a little bit. It's like preying on the elderly, or the poor, they're already at a disadvantage, so scoring doesn't take any real work. You don't have to be any better a person to score with some messed up bimbo. Even a stripper could be a 10, IF, you found out over time she qualified. But if she's a drug-using mom, at 30, who's scarred and has 3 kids with a X who's in the mob, you found a 5, not a ten.

Lots of guys THINK they find a 10, and maybe in looks they do, but in reality, she doesn't like the guy much, if she does, it's to compensate for her own problems, and normally, a girl who's a 10, but on this scale a 5, doesn't deserve anything ABNORMAL because she hasn't EARNED It. What has she done but LOOk good? Has she distinguished herself? Shown that she might want to know you, be a friend, or a lover?

This has long been my scale of determining how great women are, and most guys probably do it, but don't realize it. I advocate it because it communicates to another person and yourself, effectively, how you judge someone, and also, should eliminate the oneitis. A girl WORTH any level of oneitis, would be a 10, AND she'd be into you, because to BE a 10, means she has to BE into you. She'd be a 8 if she's super hot and not into you. There won't be many 10's, but each man's goal is to find his individual '10'.


A-Unit
 

wootapotky

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Aug 28, 2004
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
Location
The Corridor
A-Unit said:
NOW add, them together. What do you get?

If you have a SUPER hot girl who's a BYTCH, then she's a 6.
A-Unit

I think this can work if you say the girl is a 5*1 (5-1, 51, 5.1, whatever) because how are you going to know if the girl isn't just an uggo 2 with an amazing personality. An uggo is still an uggo even with a great personality.
 

THE_ADDMAN

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
820
Reaction score
5
Age
38
Location
Newmarket, Ontario
I propose an even easier scale

think binary.

0 or 1. All or nothing

she is either good enough, or not good enough.
 

Faca

Banned
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
151
Reaction score
1
THE_ADDMAN said:
I propose an even easier scale

think binary.

0 or 1. All or nothing

she is either good enough, or not good enough.
I'm with ADDMANN on this one! It's that simple.. good enough or not
 

Ace of Flames

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
16
Location
Everywhere you want to be.... I'm like a Visa card
THE_ADDMAN said:
I propose an even easier scale

think binary.

0 or 1. All or nothing

she is either good enough, or not good enough.
That's how it really is, when you get down to it. The whole point of the number scale is for descriptive purposes when telling the story. Even if its a bias, a high number still means that she was SOMETHING worth being around, and a low one means that its not very likely many would like her.

At least that's what I've always thought it was for. I never rate girls like this unless I'm here, and even then, I usually just say something like "this little hottie" or "she was the kind of thing to make you do a double take, in a bad way". When I'm sitting there introducing myself to her, its pretty much a snap decision in my head: "She's hot! I'd hit that!!" or "Not with a 10-foot pole. Ever."

Funny, isn't it preached here that girls make these kinds of instant decisions as well? I think we all decide potential mates in this abrubt way. Now, how that decision is changed, is totally different for a guy and a girl.
 

THE_ADDMAN

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
820
Reaction score
5
Age
38
Location
Newmarket, Ontario
yep, I understand. there are different levels of hotness. absolutely. :)

If shes worth writing a post about, shes almost definitely good enough for you though.

I just dont believe in breaking down a woman into numbers. this isnt math
 

PRMoon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2003
Messages
3,746
Reaction score
41
Age
43
Location
-777-Vegas-777-
I like the 1 to 10 scale even if I'm only using half of it beause it makes sense to me. I think of 1-10 as a percentage of 1 (10-100%) like a school grading scale. I concider five things face/head, bodyshape, breast size, height, and personality. Each of these is worth 2 points and deductions are subjective from that stand point. Sounds complicated? We'll it's not. I'll give an example.

There's a receptionist at my job (her name starts with an a...I think) Great face (2pts), Nice curvy body poportional a$$ (2pts), a cups a little on the small side (1.5pts), 5'7" perfect height for me (2pts), she's bright but a little too bubbly for my taste (1pt). So her total score is 8.5 or 85% however you want to look at it.

It may seem like a lot of math for some of you but honestly 5 things to concider with 2 point value a piece added up shouldn't be that hard. It makes you concider several things and is an absolute scale that really makes you evaluate what you're seeing and what you could potentially be getting yourself into.
 

Skilla_Staz

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
2,221
Reaction score
10
Age
35
Location
Omaha, Nebraska
I just use adjectives...
 

Docs

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
3,578
Reaction score
56
Location
Kingston, Can-a-duh
0 and 1, the true system. Everything is based off of [1 You like her], or [0 You don't like her].

A-Unit, your system is a great idea, definitely worthy of something like this...

[0 or 1 Your Approval of the Girl to Your Standard]-[1 to 5 Physical]-[1 to 5 Mental]

I think the above is the best of both. Whatya say?
 

RedPill

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
794
Reaction score
50
Location
Midwest America
Docs said:
0 and 1, the true system. Everything is based off of [1 You like her], or [0 You don't like her].

A-Unit, your system is a great idea, definitely worthy of something like this...

[0 or 1 Your Approval of the Girl to Your Standard]-[1 to 5 Physical]-[1 to 5 Mental]

I think the above is the best of both. Whatya say?
Alright, so you really want to get technical?

The magic formula:

PC * [ HR(1.1 - F) ] * (1 + 2BAC) = overall chick rating

PC = personality coefficient 0.0 - 1.0
HR = hotness rating on traditional 1 - 10 scale
F = her bodyfat %
BAC = your blood alcohol content


A math geek's wet dream, this rating formula is foolproof. Try it, it really does work. Every factor of perception is taken into consideration. However, if this actually goes through your mind in the presence of a woman, there's a 100% statistical probability you're not getting laid.

Ever.
 

THE_ADDMAN

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
820
Reaction score
5
Age
38
Location
Newmarket, Ontario
RedPill said:
Alright, so you really want to get technical?

The magic formula:

PC * [ HR(1.1 - F) ] * (1 + 2BAC) = overall chick rating

PC = personality coefficient 0.0 - 1.0
HR = hotness rating on traditional 1 - 10 scale
F = her bodyfat %
BAC = your blood alcohol content


A math geek's wet dream, this rating formula is foolproof. Try it, it really does work. Every factor of perception is taken into consideration. However, if this actually goes through your mind in the presence of a woman, there's a 100% statistical probability you're not getting laid.

Ever.

All divided by Pi! :up:
 

Spice_One

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Or you could use a letter and number system to A - E to denote Personality and 1 - 5 to denote looks (1 being highest)

A1 - Great personality / perfect looks
A5 - Great personality / ****ing ugly
E1 - Psycho ***** / perfect looks

etc
 

MindOverMatter

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 21, 2004
Messages
1,889
Reaction score
12
these scales are always too complex for me. maybe im simple minded, but to me, it's a woman, not a midterm exam.

in my mind, there's 2 types of women. those that i want to sleep with, and those that i don't. it's a waste of time grading them. if you meet two girls and you think both are hot, why bother grading which one is better? go for both.

cheers.
 

Skilla_Staz

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
2,221
Reaction score
10
Age
35
Location
Omaha, Nebraska
Theres many types to me...

Ones I only talk to. Ones I won't talk to. Ones I puke over. Ones that give me an instant hardon. Ones I'd let suck me off. Ones I'd bang the **** out of etc...

Hence my preference towards adjectives...
 

thefonz

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
1,153
Reaction score
11
Age
42
Location
Pittsburgh
MindOverMatter said:
in my mind, there's 2 types of women. those that i want to sleep with, and those that i don't. it's a waste of time grading them. if you meet two girls and you think both are hot, why bother grading which one is better? go for both.
cheers.
Agreed, but there's always one I want to sleep with MORE. I think for purposes of describing a woman's attractiveness on sosuave for other members a more accurate method of rating them is needed

Why don't we keep the 1-10 scale for looks since everyone is already familiar with that and add the second number to rate the personality attractiveness. I think 1-5 is a little narrow, we could also make this 1-10. When I was reading A-Unit's descriptions of 1-5 I had several girls in mind and I couldn't find them on that list. So it could be like, "Last week I went out with an HB7/6".....something like that.
 

Ace of Flames

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
16
Location
Everywhere you want to be.... I'm like a Visa card
thefonz said:
Why don't we keep the 1-10 scale for looks since everyone is already familiar with that and add the second number to rate the personality attractiveness. I think 1-5 is a little narrow, we could also make this 1-10. When I was reading A-Unit's descriptions of 1-5 I had several girls in mind and I couldn't find them on that list. So it could be like, "Last week I went out with an HB7/6".....something like that.
The only problem with adding a personality rating along with the looks rating is, you aren't gonna know a girl's personality just from dancing with her in a club or something. While a looks rating only takes a glance to make, getting a grasp of a girl's personality takes time. I fear the added rating would be under-utilized.
 
Top