was it easier in the 60's?

[Packers2010]

my dad's never had game - even after the sexual revolution, he had no problem getting some in the '70s.

One of my older male coworkers (used to be in a band) has told me over and over again that it was soooo easy back in the day. The way he put it - "Every time you went out, you had a 1 in 3 chance of meeting someone and running the bases."

1 in 3?! i got like a 1 in 100586870796866850. and that's a good night

 

[starfishandcoffee]

1 in 3?! i got like a 1 in 100586870796866850. and that's a good night

I know. Evolve or die is the mantra you need to keep in mind.

I look at it this way - at least this motivates me to go to the gym 5 days a week.

 

[pdx1138]

You underestimate their entitlement. They won't settle. They will whine and nag well into their 30's and 40's about "where are all the good men?" :crackup:

They will get knocked up by a desperate 8 who was tired of getting rejected by HB6's.

Then they will become single mothers and only then will their standards BEGIN to drop.

Tried, tested and true.

This is reality in my world. The only HB8+s that hit me up on pof or okc have a kid.

 

[VladPatton]

Yeah, cause men were men who didn't give a Ƒuck, got things done, and didn't have ʂhit like Glee on TV [and the media] to cram sensitivity down their throat.

 

[Mike32ct]

And women danced with MEN back in the day.

You didn't have the pseudo-lesbian, women dancing with each other crap you have today.

 

[Burroughs]

And women danced with MEN back in the day.

You didn't have the pseudo-lesbian, women dancing with each other crap you have today.

in a nutshell 17 to 1 testosterone imbalance keeps men a slave to women
...in our current society

...in the past women who acted up were slapped, thrown in the mud and left to be eaten by wolves.

until 100% of men forsake 100% of women...ie no fvcking or only fvcking prostitutes, female insolence will continue

 

[nismo-4]

60's??

Hell it was easy in the 90's

I second this.

In the 90's, women were actually going out to meet men. There was no facebook, twitter, myspace, pof, etc. for attention wh0ring. I remember that for young people, all you had to do was give some video game advice for the newest nintendo games. And keep up with the tv shows.

Back then, women really didn't have entitlement issues IMO. They'd be more reciptive to men approaching. And if you got a girl's number, that actually meant something because it went to the house phone.

You also didn't have to be a flashy person with a Mercedes back then either. Women actually went out and socialized with men.

Also, women had respect for a working man trying to come up. They would even help said working man. Not only that, women actually married for love, even if the man was not rich.

Damn.

 

[Blackmm]

I can date a white chick, parade her all around town and not worry about getting police dogs let loose on me or ending up like Emmit Till. Fvck the 60s.

 

[( . )( . )]

did they need Game?

No, game was just a tool to counter to femcuntery. Beta's were still viable and driven as civilization builders with the promise of a loving wife and progeny plus unrestrained hypergamy wasn't around, most beta's could acquire a wife with roughly matched looks, land whales were also not an epidemic. There was no 90/10 or 80/20 rule (whichever you believe is more accurate.)

 

[TillTheEndOfTime]

No, game was just a tool to counter to femcuntery. Beta's were still viable and driven as civilization builders with the promise of a loving wife and progeny plus unrestrained hypergamy wasn't around, most beta's could acquire a wife with roughly matched looks, land whales were also not an epidemic. There was no 90/10 or 80/20 rule (whichever you believe is more accurate.)

Now if you're not in her social circle or 2-3 points more attractive than her, forget about it.

 

[FrogWife]

I second this.

In the 90's, women were actually going out to meet men. There was no facebook, twitter, myspace, pof, etc. for attention wh0ring. I remember that for young people, all you had to do was give some video game advice for the newest nintendo games. And keep up with the tv shows.

Back then, women really didn't have entitlement issues IMO. They'd be more reciptive to men approaching. And if you got a girl's number, that actually meant something because it went to the house phone.

You also didn't have to be a flashy person with a Mercedes back then either. Women actually went out and socialized with men.

Also, women had respect for a working man trying to come up. They would even help said working man. Not only that, women actually married for love, even if the man was not rich.

Damn.

LOL! You're 26... in the '90s, you were in.... elementary school!

 

[Packers2010]

I know. Evolve or die is the mantra you need to keep in mind.

I look at it this way - at least this motivates me to go to the gym 5 days a week.

yeah.. i'm starting to feel this way... though i went out last night and now i feel pretty low today... last night went ok.

 

[PapiChulo]

I ve talked to an old timer about it once. And he said it was indeed the time of free love and women would beg you to f&ck them. He pointed out that really attractive guys would claim literally 100s of lays, yes - hundreds. He himself has done pretty well and still at it at the ripe age of 63 (with some Viagra).

 

[Down Low]

I can date a white chick, parade her all around town and not worry about getting police dogs let loose on me or ending up like Emmit Till. Fvck the 60s.

But you still think of yourself as a dirty low down N-gga. Sure you do. You have to qualify yourself as good enough by dating white chicks and parading around like the town clown. Do you "parade her around town" when you date a black chick? No.

C'mon. Own up to it. You call all black men "N-ggaz" all the time, but get your panties in a twist around your ankles every time you hear a white man doing the same. Hey, no white man put your mind into ghetto prison. You did that to yourself. And in 2012 -- not 1962.

You'll be nothing but a lezbo doing "consciousness raising" kissing in front of the humanities building of her campus -- and never a man -- until you stop play-acting at being the slobbering emotional liberal-paternalistic martyr.

 

[Stagger Lee]

lol i'm gonna take an educated guess and assume you're white. if so **** yeah it was.


let me expand before someone closes the thread lol.


look, the problem that men have today with dating is the same problem, the exact same actually as we are having with the economy when you break it all down

once you get past all the bull****, all the political propaganda, the bottom line with the economy is that you in a nutshell, have more people, that are competing for the same amount of jobs (if not less) than you did 40 years ago. We can ship our manufacturing jobs overseas now. We can ship our programming jobs overseas.. I have said it a few times my best programmer is based in Uttar Pradesh. 40 years ago I would not have had access to him.

so you get a lot of people.. either people who used to do hard core blue coller work like building cars, that can't find work. American based programmers, there is still a very good market for but the avg to below avg get culled out really quick; people will pay for good work but people won't pay for generic avg website work like they would 10 years ago just beucse you live in the same city, so the bottom tier of programmers are fighting for scraps and are living hand to mouth if that, people will outsource avg website work 8 days a week and honestly they should. that's capitalism. why pay you 1500 dollars for a site that i can get built the exact same avg quality for 700 somewhere else lol i don't give a **** how much you paid to go to college or what your bills are it's not going to guilt me into paying more for a site. it' snot my fault you suck at your job. But the above avg to bad ass programmers, generally don't have a probelm finding clients.


The game is no different. Women, because of race relations, ease of travel, social media, just have more options. at the end of the day, that's what this is all about. Also add in the fact that women, for the most part, don't need men finandically.. a lot of women make just as much if not more than men do, so while women are wired to want a guy to be the head of a household, the ability to put food on the table is not an exaggerated character trait like it was 40 years ago. game = trying to put yourself back at the top of a woman's options list whereas 40 years ago you were there just by default beucase she couldn't date 1/3rd of the people she saw beucse it was stigmatized and she didn't' know anyone else around town or out of town so you're it


the cream is gonna rise to the top. in work, or in game. the top is not gonna have a problem getting laid. the bottom class wasn't getting laid then and isn't getting laid now. it's hte male middle class that is suffering, guys who don't want to put the work in but yet, still want HB 8's, mad that they have other options and would rather spend their time lashing out rather than addressing the problem


i joke but in a serious manner i don't understand how people can believe in capitalism yet not be gung ho about hypergamy.. it's the same freaking thing lol. i guess when one benefits you and one doesn't...

because women, don't for the most part literally need men anymore, the price of pvssy has inflated. it's worth more beucase they can be more selective about who they give it out to and don't HAVE to use it as a bargaining tool to secure a life style.

in short what i am really trying to say is that women haven't per say changed as much as the conditions of which a woman will be intimate with a man have because of socioeconomic conditions. Women were always "like this".

You make the good counterargument here. But the thing is in the 60's, and even before that and up till about the early 90's, with both capitalism and getting girls the "wealth" was spreaded much more equally among men.

Also it is debatable that the best man gets the girl or the most capital in the present day super-competitve, super-hypergamous enviroment. For one thing women have more free choice of picking their guys than in the past and women can't choose wisely.

It's also kind of alarming that a lot of black guys on here in threads like these seem to be sympathetic with the feminist and liberals. It really does seem like they are more on the side of women against white males than they are men vs women. I don't necessarily put you in that class BB but it's something I've long noticed.