Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

video: swat team shoots dog in front of child

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
38
Kerpal said:

Wrong :)

Kerpal said:
Nazi concentration camp guards were just following orders too...

Kerpal said:
I disagree.
Congrats on being wrong twice. We can't have an orderly society if every person gets to individually decide what to obey and what to not obey based on their personal world view.




Kerpal said:
.... we should first ask "Should this be a law?".
Sort of moving outside the scope, as I said, effecting change via legal means is a different thing, that's the political process.
 

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
77
The dog shooting does bring up a question though. How are SWAT teams to deal with hostile dogs like pit bulls during a raid? This is something I never thought about, but yeah, most people have dogs, and if they have to raid a house, a big powerful dog is going to go berserk seeing a group of people crash through the front door.
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
38
speakeasy said:
The dog shooting does bring up a question though. How are SWAT teams to deal with hostile dogs like pit bulls during a raid? This is something I never thought about, but yeah, most people have dogs, and if they have to raid a house, a big powerful dog is going to go berserk seeing a group of people crash through the front door.

That whole scenario just sucks because it's a terrible outcome without any obvious (to me) solution. I've already said I think the vast majority of our laws, including the prohibition type ones, are a waste of time, but until they are abolished the police are duty bound to enforce those laws.

I do think it's borderline idiotic to have a big dog in the city where it has to essentially live indoors with people, but a lot of people do that. A lot of people are pretty dumb.
 

Alle_Gory

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
4,200
Reaction score
79
Location
T-Dot
bigjohnson said:
That whole scenario just sucks because it's a terrible outcome without any obvious (to me) solution. I've already said I think the vast majority of our laws, including the prohibition type ones, are a waste of time, but until they are abolished the police are duty bound to enforce those laws.

I do think it's borderline idiotic to have a big dog in the city where it has to essentially live indoors with people, but a lot of people do that. A lot of people are pretty dumb.
The guy had a corgi and a pit bull (in a cage).

This is a corgi: http://www.petsplace.co.za/Corgi_Toby.jpg
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
38
Alle_Gory said:
The guy had a corgi and a pit bull (in a cage).

This is a corgi: http://www.petsplace.co.za/Corgi_Toby.jpg

According to the news reports he had a Corgi (ya, so what) and a Pitbull which was restrained in the kitchen; I suspect it was probably gated off with one of those child doors. A lot of people use them, I have for training purposes, and I doubt anyone has a full on chain link kennel in their suburban kitchen. It's not a really secure 'cage'.

I won't have a dog unless I'm in a place with at least 5 acres so they can have a good place to run, but yes I love dogs and when I'm living in those conditions I've always had them.
 

It doesn't matter how good-looking you are, how romantic you are, how funny you are... or anything else. If she doesn't have something INVESTED in you and the relationship, preferably quite a LOT invested, she'll dump you, without even the slightest hesitation, as soon as someone a little more "interesting" comes along.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Kerpal

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
3,046
Reaction score
41
bigjohnson said:
Ad hominem :)

Congrats on being wrong twice. We can't have an orderly society if every person gets to individually decide what to obey and what to not obey based on their personal world view.
Sure we can, as long as the laws they're disobeying only affect victimless crimes. Like carrying a gun, or smoking pot. Nobody is hurt by it, so we should be able to do it.

Sort of moving outside the scope, as I said, effecting change via legal means is a different thing, that's the political process.
That takes too long and won't happen in our lifetimes if at all. So I'll just obey the laws I choose to. As long as I don't hurt anyone, it doesn't matter if I obey them or not.
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
38
Kerpal said:
Ad hominem
Wrong again, actually "Congrats on being wrong twice" was borderline ad hominem though, but to really be qualifying I'd need to use the attack to shore up a point. :)



Kerpal said:
Sure we can, as long as the laws they're disobeying only affect victimless crimes. Like carrying a gun, or smoking pot. Nobody is hurt by it, so we should be able to do it.
Who determines what hurt by it, is? No one has been hurt by my past speeding, or by a friend of mine driving drunk. No one has ever been hurt a lot of individual things that may carry a statistical or societal cost.
 
Top