Rollo Tomassi
Master Don Juan
A post in another thread by ZEKKO got me to thinking about men feeling validated in their lives by means of sex or achievement, or any number of other contrived ways to rationalize feeling good about themselves.
I have never understood this want of validation in sex. At 42 I can honestly say that I have never sought or experienced what I consider personal validation from any of the many women I've ƒucked. They were hot, we were horny and I banged them without any consideration of anything beyond experiencing them sexually. I didn't go pop off to my friends about it, I didn't swell with pride, I didn't 'carve a notch on my bed post', I didn't really think much of it past it feeling really good and wanting to hit it again. I like sex for the sake of sex.
Now, I'm sure doubters will think, "yeah, well you got SOMETHING more than just the physical out of it", and while that's all nebulously true to some extent, it seems to me it's more of an attempt to shame a guy for having more sex than the average person by assuming he's doing so just to build his ego via sex. So now we attach a defacto 'purpose' for guys to have a lot of sex or want to have a lot of sex. "You have so much sex because it validates you. You're a flawed person and you seek validation in ƒucking. You only ƒuck so much because it builds up your reputation with the boys."
This of course gets easily extrapolated into all aspects of Men's lives - seeking validation in work, play, socialization with friends, fame, hobbies, etc. It becomes another operative social convention with the latent function of shaming an individual for something they do well or have a measurable degree of success with. Practically anything that could be remotely self-aggrandizing is fair game. Never is their any question about the person engaging in what they enjoy doing it for their own love of it.
I have never understood this want of validation in sex. At 42 I can honestly say that I have never sought or experienced what I consider personal validation from any of the many women I've ƒucked. They were hot, we were horny and I banged them without any consideration of anything beyond experiencing them sexually. I didn't go pop off to my friends about it, I didn't swell with pride, I didn't 'carve a notch on my bed post', I didn't really think much of it past it feeling really good and wanting to hit it again. I like sex for the sake of sex.
Now, I'm sure doubters will think, "yeah, well you got SOMETHING more than just the physical out of it", and while that's all nebulously true to some extent, it seems to me it's more of an attempt to shame a guy for having more sex than the average person by assuming he's doing so just to build his ego via sex. So now we attach a defacto 'purpose' for guys to have a lot of sex or want to have a lot of sex. "You have so much sex because it validates you. You're a flawed person and you seek validation in ƒucking. You only ƒuck so much because it builds up your reputation with the boys."
This of course gets easily extrapolated into all aspects of Men's lives - seeking validation in work, play, socialization with friends, fame, hobbies, etc. It becomes another operative social convention with the latent function of shaming an individual for something they do well or have a measurable degree of success with. Practically anything that could be remotely self-aggrandizing is fair game. Never is their any question about the person engaging in what they enjoy doing it for their own love of it.