So what do we have here after three pages?
Camp A argues:
Warrior doesn't have a right to complain because some people are worse off than him.
This is the shîttiest argument. Whoever says that, let's talk after you have something as mild as a fractured twinkie and talk at the hospital. Even the slightest health issue/obstacle completely alters our reality and perception of life. It's easy to argue from a warm arm-chair that he *must* be happy because of what he has. Sounds good on paper, but never works in a breakdown like this.
Camp B argues:
Warrior doesn't have a right to complain because he has not tried enough.
Well, with all due respect, you don't know that. Plus, there's no established definition of what "trying" constitutes. He may have pushed his limits but may not have tried enough according to others' standards. This argument is certainly stronger than Camp A --- but it has to be sugar coated and nicely put, because I don't know about you guys, but I am sick of your "tough love" shyt when you have one good thing to say once in a blue moon, you have to say it like an ass.
Camp C argues:
Past does not equal future / Optimism goes a long way / Stand up and March on Soldier.
Best we have, and best we can ever give him at the moment.
Summary
Finally ask him whether you can do something for him that will mean the world to him and isn't a big deal for you. You don't have to fvcking philosophize everything and explain it. Sometimes, just saying "I feel you brother, keep your chin up" is better than an objectively correct manifesto full of vitriol .
Remember in real life, you are putting up with whiners that are 2 orders of magnitude worse than Warrior, if you consider him a whiner. They are family, coworkers, husbands, wives, brother in laws, bosses, kids, and what have you.
Just because you are anonymous, don't feel "justified" in passing judgement, none of us *really* knows what he's going through.