that's not true.Danger said:BB, I have tons of respect for you, but nobody has the right to initiate physical assault. That is the stupidest $hit I have ever heard.
Why would one have the right to assault when they think they are being followed, but one would not have the right to shoot someone when they felt their life was in immediate danger? That makes no sense whatsoever.
Bottom line, whoever initiated physical assault is the guilty person.
Wife beating, cop attacking, co-worker assaulting, medication using Zimmerman was no angel either. His past, along with an actual record, will do him a lot worse in court than Martins past will do him good.Danger said:http://glpiggy.net/2013/05/23/trayvon-martin-wanted-a-gun/
Apparently Trayvon was not the 12 year old angelic boy we were all led to believe.
He said, she said. There is no evidence of who attacked first. We only have the words to go by of the guy whos trying to stay out of prison. So thats not much to go on at all.twentee said:fvck you, anyone is free to follow anybody. the one who starts the use of force is the one at fault. Just because a guy is following you is no reason to excalate into violence. If that is what happened, the punk got what he deserved.
So you tell me Mr. 20 year old black hustla D-DIGGY DAWG **** nicka badass, from YOUR OWN DAMN TEXT, who do you think is the guilty party here? Do you see a problem with this at all? Do you? And looking at Danger's text, they are screwing up even more.Hustlaz Ambition said:1. The fat ass self hating halfbreed should have kept his ass in the car when the police told him to NOT FOLLOW Trayvon.
2. The pro Trayvon side have used a toolbox full of trickery and illusions to get people to favor their side and turn people against Zimmerman. From NBC editing the tapes to make Zimmerman appear racist, bringing in race hustlers Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, using old baby pictures of Trayvon in Hollister and American Eagle to make him appear more innocent than he really was. when in reality he was a 6'2 goldteeth and tattoo wearing, weed smoking, gun toting jackass that would fight his bus driver.
Exactly. It's like the OJ trial - black people didn't care if he was guilty or innocent. It was "us vs. them". Same deal with this Trayvon Martin circus. They want to crucify Zimmerman because Trayvon was black and Zimmerman is not. Meanwhile, thousands of blacks get shot every year by other blacks and the black community couldn't care less.speed dawg said:I agree with your reasoning here, but when's the last time you took up or sided with the white guy in a situation like this? That's the problem with most black folks, they are going to gang up no matter what. I'd say 99.9% of the black folks in this country voted for Obama for no other reason than because he's black.
Most blacks wouldn't even be arguing this point if it weren't a black vs. white issue. Quite simply, they wouldn't care. If Zimmerman gets off, they will be mad. If he doesn't, they'll be back here talking this "can't we just make peace" stuff to try and pacify the white crowd. It doesn't work both ways. If they want to be idealists (which is a noble thing to do) they have to see it both ways. You have to truly see through color. And by saying "they" I know I'm making a sweeping generalization about the people who are supporting Trayvon Martin.
Are you Boilermaker?Bokanovsky said:Exactly. It's like the OJ trial - black people didn't care if he was guilty or innocent. It was "us vs. them". Same deal with this Trayvon Martin circus. They want to crucify Zimmerman because Trayvon was black and Zimmerman is not. Meanwhile, thousands of blacks get shot every year by other blacks and the black community couldn't care less.
Lmao @ you taking Zimmermans word for what happened. The dude has a history of violence against women and police. And other people have said he was odd and had a temper.speed dawg said:So you tell me Mr. 20 year old black hustla D-DIGGY DAWG **** nicka badass, from YOUR OWN DAMN TEXT, who do you think is the guilty party here? Do you see a problem with this at all? Do you? And looking at Danger's text, they are screwing up even more.
Neither you, backbreaker or Gaylan would have even replied in this thread had it not been a race issue. To you, whites are guilty until proven innocent, and blacks the opposite.
Zimmerman followed, Martin attacked. One committed a crime, the other didn't. Honestly, the world is probably a better place without thugs like Martin.
If anything, this is like the OJ trial because people wanna brand the killer as innocent despite his violent past, before the case even plays out. In reality, the only reason it appears like an "us vs them" is because it appears to many that Zimmerman wrongly profiled a kid who was merely walking home from the store.Bokanovsky said:Exactly. It's like the OJ trial - black people didn't care if he was guilty or innocent. It was "us vs. them". Same deal with this Trayvon Martin circus. They want to crucify Zimmerman because Trayvon was black and Zimmerman is not. Meanwhile, thousands of blacks get shot every year by other blacks and the black community couldn't care less.
What? I seriously had no idea wtf I just read :crackup: . Did blacks take your lunch in highschool or something :crackup: IM NEUTRAL ON THE CASE! **** OFF! You are the one making this a race issue if anything, but looking at your location I should not even be surprised. I don't see things in black and white(but I understand that's how things go in the south). I see things through a black/brown/yellow perspective if anything. This ain't no damn 1866 :crackup:speed dawg said:So you tell me Mr. 20 year old black hustla D-DIGGY DAWG **** nicka badass, from YOUR OWN DAMN TEXT, who do you think is the guilty party here? Do you see a problem with this at all? Do you? And looking at Danger's text, they are screwing up even more.
Neither you, backbreaker or Gaylan would have even replied in this thread had it not been a race issue. To you, whites are guilty until proven innocent, and blacks the opposite.
Zimmerman followed, Martin attacked. One committed a crime, the other didn't. Honestly, the world is probably a better place without thugs like Martin.
It doesn't matter how good-looking you are, how romantic you are, how funny you are... or anything else. If she doesn't have something INVESTED in you and the relationship, preferably quite a LOT invested, she'll dump you, without even the slightest hesitation, as soon as someone a little more "interesting" comes along.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
http://www.rsdnation.com/tyler/blog...ionally-reactive-if-i-had-it-all-would-i-careJaylan said:^You forgot to mention that this is like the only pickup forum (at least from what Ive encountered), that has so many dudes overly concerned with minorities and gay men. Nvm all the political nonsense as well.
Any other forum Ive been on, the guys dont give a rats ass who other guys decide to sleep with. And they dont spend much time on hot button current events. They strictly care about getting it in with the ladies, and from what I read, it appears they are loads more successful than most here.
Id say a lot of that comes down to those dudes not having a supremely negative attitude.
Its funny how you refuse, or are unable to see the hypocrisy in your posts. All you ever do is insult people or jump on any chance to put down racial or sexual orientation minority groups. You've done it in this and other threads, yet you have the audacity to ask me what my posts have to do with Martin? You clearly have poor reading comprehension skills, because my posts in this thread clearly have something to do with Trayvon Martin.speed dawg said:Hustaz d diggy dawg's and Gaylan's posts have what to do with Trayvon Martin again?
They did show your true colors and intelligence, though. By all means, carry on.....BROTHA!!!
Wow. Just.....wow.Jaylan said:Its funny how people like you can pull some racist bull, yet try and label others as race baitors for daring to challenge your stupidity.