jophil28
Master Don Juan
Frankly I am not surpised that you needed to weigh in to this. No challenge to your opinions goes unpunished..Rollo Tomassi said:Well, since you're fishing for it with this whole thread, I'll bite.
Her provisioning was already taken care of. You mention she'd been with the husband for 20 some years, with 2 homes, solely in her name, worth over $2 million. I'd say that provisioning need has more than been met. In fact, this is the very problem "professional women" often confront; they become so self-reliant for their own provisioning that the only men capable of exceeding their self-provisioning are guys more "professional" and affluent than themselves.
However, you're committing the cardinal sin of presuming that 'provisioning' means financial wealth. Women have an innate need for security, but that's not limited to money. It's definitely a factor, but it may be a lower or higher priority depending upon her conditions.
You've tried to qualify the husband in your long-story-short synopsis as a combat veteran; and presumedly a tough Alpha, good genes male. And perhaps he was. Perhaps this original perception the wife had was what attracted her to him. However 20 years later he's a definite AFC and not the Man he once was as we can see by his response to her first infidelity. Not only this, but you attempt to disqualify the 'weedy' lover as both a bad provider and a beta bad-genes male. Ha ha, an exception to the Schedules of Mating ideology! Furthermore, to better set the trap, you challenge us (me?) to guess what type of guy she goes for, fully expecting the "oh she must've ƒucked the pool boy" answer without any more information or background on your characters than the sketchy "abridged version".
Really JOPHIL, I expect better from you.
The opportunity to have a dig at me was just too tasty to ignore wasn't it ? :nono: Nice attempted slapdown Rollo, but no cigar..
The lover guy was "weedy" and did not fit any of your criteria. He was some kind of "fling" who somehow became, in her delusion, her "future husband".
He was the office sleasebag with a reputation for chasing tail and cheating on his family.
Her "provisioning" was certainly NOT assured because her entitlements under Australian Law require a property settlement to access their money . Under Family Law her husband is guaranteed a 50% split in most cases (regardless of whose name is on the titles) when there are no dependent children. IN this case HE was the custodial parent and she was the breadwinner and therefore he is the beneficiary of a greater share..(or will be whene their divorce proceeds)
Secondly as a veteran , he is entitled to significant financial and medical benefits and our law provides for her to receive exactly the same benefits should he die. She forfeited all that .
Her 'provisioning' was highly 'at risk' by running off like she did.
Husband is now entitled to make a claim for spousal support as well as several other minor claims against her income. She will wind up paying him a monthly stipend.
Their houses are about to be auctioned (a court order is in progress) and she will wind up with a minor share of the proceeds, no marriage and no place to live.