The word, "SLUT"

[edger]

"Slut" by definition is: a woman who sleeps with multiple guys. Why do I see so many posters here using this term with a negative connotation attached to it? What's wrong with a chick who sleeps with multiple guys? Nothing wrong with it. We do it all the time. It's natural. It's an essential part of a human beings functionality, both male and female. We all should be HAPPY women are putting out.

 

[The Sperminator]

So you wouldn't care if your gf slept with over 100 guys?

 

[decades]

umm no "We" don't do it all the time. very few of "us" do it all the time. It's a myth. Simply look at published statistics. And yes, there is something wrong with sleeping with a LOT of women and a LOT of guys. You think a woman who is conditioned to do that can turn that Habit pattern "off" like some faucet? Like YOU are just so special?

 

[Vulpine]

So you wouldn't care if your gf slept with over 100 guys?

Honestly, I'd never know. I'd never ask. So... no, I wouldn't care. If that fact DID happen to become known, then I'd have to admit that, well, she hasn't slept with half the women I have. So, in all fairness, she's half the "slut" I am.

Perception.

 

[sparky0000]

So now you will tell us how we should think? WTF is this? If you wanna sleep with chubs who are infected with HPV and God only knows what else I say do it. I really don't care. Just remember that some might prefer a clean girl that hasn't been ruined yet. Do what you gotta do, but don't tell others what they should or shouldn't do.

 

[Obsidian]

Feminine women will not act slutty. Moreover, women lose value as their # of sexual partners increases. (Men, in contrast, may greatly benefit from the "social proof" phenomenon.)

Read "The Natural Order of Things" by Lastman
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=50480

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

So you wouldn't care if your gf slept with over 100 guys?

Does it matter if a guy has?

 

[Serialized3]

Does it matter if a guy has?

Yes. Man-hors are just as bad as regular ones.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Yes. Man-hors are just as bad as regular ones.

How come?

 

[Obsidian]

Yes. Man-hors are just as bad as regular ones.

Well, you can argue that God hates promiscuity or that man-hors are immoral in some other way, but my point is that many women appreciate horishness in a man. (because it's natural for a man to assert himself and be sexually outgoing) If a woman is a hor, tho, don't expect anything more than a ONS. And many people tire of those eventually and want something more.

 

[edger]

So you wouldn't care if your gf slept with over 100 guys?

No, why should I ?

 

[edger]

If a woman is a hor, tho, don't expect anything more than a ONS.

You're WRONG. That's a weak argument. Do you know how many long term relationships come out of one night stands? I got news for ya, the sooner a chick sleeps with you, the more INTERESTED she is is you. Remember that. So consider it a PLUS.

 

[wayword]

Well, you can argue that God hates promiscuity or that man-hors are immoral in some other way, but my point is that many women appreciate horishness in a man. (because it's natural for a man to assert himself and be sexually outgoing) If a woman is a hor, tho, don't expect anything more than a ONS. And many people tire of those eventually and want something more.

Truth is, women are secretly impressed by promiscuous men and men are secretly impressed by virgin women.

If a woman meets an ugly man but finds out he's been with 300 women - she's secretly impressed and may want to be #301.

If a man meets a 23-yo HB10 and finds out she's still a virgin - he's secretly impressed and might dream of marrying her.

 

[edger]

Feminine women will not act slutty. Moreover, women lose value as their # of sexual partners increases. (Men, in contrast, may greatly benefit from the "social proof" phenomenon.)

Read "The Natural Order of Things" by Lastman
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=50480

WRONG. First off, ALL women(feminine, semi-femine, etc.) will put out if they're into a guy enough. Second, some guys won't value women much if they put out a lot because they've been CONDITIONED to think like this. They've been conditioned to think that there's something wrong with that, and the fact is, there is NOTHING wrong with a woman who puts out. Shows ya in the last 300 yrs we still haven't come that far as a society away from Puritanical thinking. Pretty pathetic. Like I said, be f*cking GRATEFUL that there are women who regularly put out. Otherwise you'd be sitting at home yanking yourself.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Well, you can argue that God hates promiscuity or that man-hors are immoral in some other way...

Sorry, but I didn't get that email from Him(Her), but back to your point...

...But my point is that many women appreciate horishness in a man.

Is this really "wh0rishness" or is it some other attributes that when combined allows someone to act "wh0rishly?"

...If a woman is a hor, tho, don't expect anything more than a ONS. And many people tire of those eventually and want something more.

If she's truly a wh0re that's one thing but I believe that there's more to take into account than amount of sexual partners.

We can all imagine women who set their focuses her interests only on men who are good providers and uses his need for conquest against him by withholding sex until they are married. Sex in itself isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's the power that sex has over a person which is damaging.

 

[DJDamage]

Honestly, I'd never know. I'd never ask. So... no, I wouldn't care. If that fact DID happen to become known, then I'd have to admit that, well, she hasn't slept with half the women I have. So, in all fairness, she's half the "slut" I am.

Perception.

Perception? I don't know about that. There is a difference between men and women when it comes to sex.

If a woman let 100 different d1cks to get inside of her, why should she change her ways once she meets with you? You are just the next d1ck in line and you will be either replaced in no time or shared with others at the same time.

I can't remember who said it (maybe Pook?) but it rings true:

The more relationships a man goes through the more normal he becomes (hance an AFC has dated very few women in his life or none).

The more relationships a woman goes through the more messed up she becomes.

 

[Last Man Standing]

Hor love everybody an no one at the same time!!!

There is no such thing as a "man-hor" -- quit using words you hear in the media and music -- that is feminist homo/hor conditioning!!!!

It is natural for a man - no, it is obligatory that a man pursues a woman to his fullest - it is unnatural to pursue something aggressively then once it is obtained to refuse it without fulfilling your objective!!!!

It is a man's duty to go after a woman he is attracted to but it is not natural for a woman to popen her legs to every man who pursues her!! The hor label is a label to define ONLY a woman (not a man) to indicate that she has swayed from her natural feminine sexual state.

Men who pursue hors are label hormongers!!

A slut is a hor held to a higher degree!

This is The Natural Order Of Things!!!

 

[PeterNorthisawesome]

"Slut" by definition is: a woman who sleeps with multiple guys. Why do I see so many posters here using this term with a negative connotation attached to it? What's wrong with a chick who sleeps with multiple guys? Nothing wrong with it. We do it all the time. It's natural. It's an essential part of a human beings functionality, both male and female. We all should be HAPPY women are putting out.

Wow AFC right here... ya you would be CONTENT WITH YOUR WIFE SCREWING MULTIPLE GUYS and raising another dude's kid right? Did you know that there are chicks who give BJ to a guy and then go out 1 hour late with AFC just to get dinner? I bet the AFC tasted it when he kissed her. :crackup: "NORMAL" HEALTHY WOMAN aren't like guys and don't need multiple partners, it's not feminie nature for them to sleep around like guys. SLUTS usually have some kind of problem, they're wicked insecure so they make it up by having multiple partners. This way they feel more accepted.

 

[Serialized3]

You're WRONG. That's a weak argument. Do you know how many long term relationships come out of one night stands? I got news for ya, the sooner a chick sleeps with you, the more INTERESTED she is is you. Remember that. So consider it a PLUS.

Actually, the sooner a girl sleeps with you, the easier she is. Interest is a prerequisite for sex, but sex is not a prerequisite for interest.

I would never get into a LTR with a chick I had a ONS with (if I was interested in ONS). Hooking up with someone you barely know speaks volumes about your character.

 

[djSlvt]

"Slut" is when you see a b1tch you fvck a b1tch and make other men jelous and insecure. "Slut" is me fvcking your wife and then watching your TV.


If my girl does that to me, I leave her.