Ease, that will be the day when I bow down and take a lesson from an emotionally reactive and volitile punk like yourself.
Most of your threads reveal a blind devotion to your idea of "principle". Principle is great to live by, and I do far more than most men, but blind devotion to it reveals great insecurity. My adherance to principle is based on life strategy and tactics. I cause principle to serve me, never do I serve it.
So again, I'm telling you you're dead wrong. You're making a mountain of a molehill. You set the boundaries. If she starts to get chatted up and can't escape, you move between her and the guy or guys and guide her away. Since you've already set the boundaries, she's grateful for the rescue and cooperates fully.
I can teach you a lot about female compliance, son. When you proactively establish who wears the pants and set the boundaries (which most women love, btw), you are equipped to handle such situations with ease (no pun intended, because hotheads can't handle such situations).
Regarding your last post, first, learn the definition of a sh!t test. The scenario you describe is not a sh!t test. Secondly, you should strive to be like me... a man 100% of the time, not just "once in a while".
My bottom line is that the man makes the rules and sets the frame and expectations. Problem solved because it's prevented in the first place.
That's your lesson for today.
Ok, I'm ready for your next reaction.