zekko
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,057
- Reaction score
- 8,897
No. What I said was that if he was sexually assaulted as a child, that makes it more "statistically likely" that he is guilty, than if he were not sexually assaulted".You claim it is "statistically likely" he's guilty of sexual assault then claim that "no one knows for sure." Which one is it?
But I don't know for a fact if he was guilty or not. Neither does anyone else here. But there was certainly some suspicious behavior displayed. If it looks like a duck and all that.