The Misandry Hour

[zekko]

I like to listen to podcasts instead of the radio when possible, and I found this podcast called The Misandry Hour. I thought maybe it would be a show talking about misandry, men's rights, and such. Instead, it turned out to be a bunch of women promoting pro-feminist ideas.

Once I figured out what it was, I turned it off, but not before I heard several women claim that there was no such thing as misandry. Meanwhile, the theme song contains a lyric saying "We bathe in men's tears" or something like that.

Apparently these women think that there are no real problems faced by males, and certainly no problems caused by discrimination. They said that the opposite of misogyny is not misandry, it is female freedom.

I don't mind if women want to put out a podcast bashing men, but for them to claim that we face no problems because of our gender does irritate me. One thing they said that I couldn't disagree with was that male violence was a problem - men are not only often violent toward women, but also toward other men, wars, etc. That's not to say only men are violent, but certainly the vast majority of violence is committed by men. Testosterone is a b!tch, I guess

https://soundcloud.com/themisandryhour

 

[BeExcellent]

Ugh. Obviously these women don't get reality.

Start a podcast called The Misogyny Hour and see how long that is allowed to exist, and voila, discrimination against men proved.

It's as ridiculous to have openly man hating or woman hating rhetoric, but guess which one will get a pass & which one won't? Therein lies the truth.

The truth is that man hating falls in line with the social agenda of the moment, but woman hating? (omg, NO!!!, intolerable *sarcasm*)

So yeah, shaking my head. It's a hypocritical double standard to be sure.

 

[daddymonsterpoodle]

If feminists couldcshow me a successful matriarchy anywhere in time or history I would think they might have a point. Show me the male only scholarships or workplace fatalities of women being 50% not 3%. How about combat deaths of female frontline soldiers (less than 8% of the military). Women not needing to be eligible for the draft to vote etc etc...

The one statistic that is unavoidable though is that men are more physically violent. Blaming testosterone doesn't excuse it. Sure, I want to win my volleyball game. I don't want to go home and break my wife's face.
The question is why are men provably violent, society, relationships, lack of father figures?

 

[oOh Nasty]

Fine. Let's round up all the feminists and dumbo-drop them in the middle of sub-Saharan Africa. That's where mankind started so it makes the most sense. No bros allowed. These ladies can finally be free to start and run civilization the way they want to. I'm sure within a few years they'll have things humming along without all that pesky repression.

Meanwhile we'll keep the truly feminine women here for ourselves!

I legitimately would actually like to see this. Curious to see how long they'd be able to sustain themselves. They should make it into a hidden reality TV show.

 

[BetterCallSaul]

Stop wasting your time.

 

[zekko]

If they would have said something like "Women face bigger problems than men" or "Women face more discrimination than men", that would have been one thing. But to totally deny that misandry exists at all, in any way, shape, or form, that's just too much.

 

[daddymonsterpoodle]

It messes with the whole 3rd wave bvll**** about being victims to the Patriarchy. Feminists will tell you that victims are incapable of being oppressors. I guess that means it is not racist for a black man or a woman to use the words honky, hebe, kike, spic, wop or wog. Explain to me how "kill all men" is not hate speech.
I am pretty sure "kill all negroes" or "kill all women" would be. Lets talk about the feminist idea of putting men in camps....wasnt that tried in 1939?

Explain to me how the 'victims' of the patriarchy work less hours, in less dangerous jobs, live longer, die of less stress related illnesses, suffer from mental illness less, commit suicide less, spend more money, have more money spent on them medically and through social welfare, spend less time in prison (usually nicer ones than men's), ...and STILL claim they are the victims. BULLSH*T.

 

[Desdinova]

I legitimately would actually like to see this. Curious to see how long they'd be able to sustain themselves. They should make it into a hidden reality TV show.

It wouldn't last long...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...ny-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html

Though I will not absolve myself of all guilt, I believe the business was ruined by the destructive jealousy and in-fighting of an allfemale staff. Their selfishness and insecurities led to my company's demise. When I needed the socalled 'Sisterhood', believe me, it just wasn't there.

 

[zekko]

I legitimately would actually like to see this. Curious to see how long they'd be able to sustain themselves.

They wouldn't be able to reproduce, so obviously the longest they could last would be one generation.

It messes with the whole 3rd wave bvll**** about being victims to the Patriarchy.

Unfortunately, it is other men who have imposed a lot of these government-led pro-feminist anti-male laws onto other men. Some here would call them white knights. Then when it comes to things like male rape in prison, again it is other men who are committing the acts or allowing them to happen.

 

[oOh Nasty]

They wouldn't be able to reproduce, so obviously the longest they could last would be one generation.

We can drop them a few female orphans based on a child to adult ratio every few decades or so. That way, they don't even have to worry about childbearing at all. Stack the odds to their favor .

 

[daddymonsterpoodle]

Yup...let's see how long they can maintain sisterhood and egalitarian ideals when they are hungry or there is manual labour to be done.