The lame myth that "Texting Kills Relationships" and that a Phone Call is better

Maximus Rex

Banned
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
445
Location
Villa Regis
Pt. II

rascal99v said:
and how you can't gauge any real interest because you can't hear the "tone in her voice",
So you mean to tell me that you discern a person's mental state or mood simply by the tonality in their voice, really bruh?

rascal99v said:
or you are too "available and needy" because you're texting.
Link please. I guarantee to you that you're taking a statement entirely out of context. What has been said, that by texting guys aren't separating themselves from the crowd and they're using it as crutch as to delay interacting with the chick. Dudes (for some reason,) feel that being rejecting by a via text is a lot less damaging than to be rejected via some personal interaction.

rascal99v said:
Well, I say that's all bullsh1t because none of it is true.
You're basing this opinion on what?

rascal99v said:
These guys use texting as an excuse because they don't know how to do it.
Rex is anxiously awaiting rascals99v's Guide to Gaming Women and Getting Laid Solely via Texting Vol. I. Dude if you indeed have this wealth of knowledge on the subject matter, stop holding out and share it with the rest of us.

rascal99v said:
So, they blame texting for the problem when it's really themselves who don't know how to game women.
Again, you're implying that texting is superior to texting. I'm of the train of thought that texting should only be used for logistical purposes. However, (and correct ole Rex if he's wrong,) you're saying that a chick's interest level can be raised by simply viewing binary code symbols on a LCD screen.

rascal99v said:
If she has no interest, that's why your texting is failing, which is because she isn't interested. That's not the fault of texting, that's low interest on the part of the chick. It doesn't matter what type of communication you used with her, she still won't be interested if she doesn't like you. So, to say that "texting killed a relationship" is asinine
.

Let's say you get a broad's number right and it's a lukewarm number close. You're saying that you can convey personality and charm via texting, that some how can't be done over the phone, really bruh?

rascal99v said:
If you don't know how to game women through text, you won't be able to game her on the phone or in person. Men who don't know how to game, doesn't know how to game women period. So, don't blame texting for your lack of game. Brush up on your skills and get some game before you bash the methods that actually work. :yes:
Rex doesn't understand the correlation.

rascal99v said:
There's nothing wrong with a phone call, in fact you should talk to chicks, but texting is faster and easier way to spin plates and it saves you time.
Dude, stop lying. You mean to tell me that you can text as fast as the average person can speak?

rascal99v said:
But these anti texting guys try to spin it their way to make you think a phone call is your only solution to get a date and to get laid. That's another myth these guys will use to get you to think that texting is bad and a phone call is better.
By speaking to a chick on the I can convey the euthusiasm, personality, humor and charm that I did in the initial conversation. Where's as saying, "Hi.," :D doesn't mean anything.

rascal99v said:
If a chick wants to fvck you, she will want to fvck you regardless of what you use to communicate with. Chicks who don't care to fvck you won't, and your phone call isn't going to help you anyway.
Again, you share the secrets of this "Great Texting Game," with the rest of us.

rascal99v said:
Not one of these anti texting guys could ever answer this question I gave them. In fact, they ignore it every time I ask. So, I'll have to ask it again.
Link please.

rascal99v said:
How can you gauge any interest or hear the tone in her voice if she doesn't give a sh1t to talk to you on the phone?
You'll hear the disinterest in her voice.

rascal99v said:
Chicks who aren't interested in you, won't answer your phone call. You will never get to hear the tone in her voice.
And here's where you go into the realm of not knowing that the :cuss: it is that you're talking about. Women are attention fiends and attention is a source of mental sustenance for them, in addition, women will do damn near anything to assuage their boredom. After all, we're talking about individuals who will go out on a date with a man knowing damn well, he'll never get to know her carnally. These are also chicks that keep orbiters around to fulfill their insatiable need for attention. Again, Rex will use himself as an example.

Read and Do Not Do This http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=73178

Now rascal is going to say, "But she never had any interest in you." Rex knows this, but you isn't the point of me posting that thread. I did it illustrate the point that women will indeed use you as an instrument to assuage their boredom and as a means to get their attention fixes. However, through phone conversations and back when Yahoo! Chat was poppin', (damn I just hella date myself,) I was able to pique a chick's interest with good conversation. Again, I personally don't see how a woman's interest can be raised via, :flowers:, :up:, :cheer: and other binary code symbols. Personally, I really like to know the intricacies involving this because Rex really doesn't like to talk to chicks on the phone, initially anyway.

rascal99v said:
If it was a dude she liked, she would be talking to him via text.
Can't be also true of a phone call.

rascal99v said:
So, the dude who just called a chick and got her voicemail, will end up texting her anyway to see why she didn't answer or to ask her out again.
Some thirsty AFC dude would

rascal99v said:
So, that defeats the whole purpose of your phone call to gauge her interest. Chicks who don't like you, won't want to talk to you. Period.
From personal experience, it depends.

rascal99v said:
Being "too available" or "too needy" is lame as well. You text chicks on your time when you're not busy.
:crackup:You're funny, dude. You're making it seem like dudes are taking time away from work and school to text chicks.

rascal99v said:
Interested chicks will be excited to hear from you no matter what method of communication you used. Chicks who are not, will blow you off with any method you use.
With that being said, can't an argument be made that about the efficacy calling because the interaction is more personal?

rascal99v said:
Men can abuse talking on the phone as well. But these anti texting guys won't tell you that.
Again, you're showing your ignorance in regards to the subject. I'm sure you do a search of "phone game," and read the threads, sooner or later you'll come to a post pertaining to some dude staying on the phone with a chick too long.

rascal99v said:
A guy with bad game will be boring as hell on the phone and the chick will do anything she can get off the line. A dude can talk for a long time on the phone, call her way too much, talk about nothing, or even say stupid sh1t that will turn the chick off. Any time you communicate with women you can say stupid sh1t. That is the fault of the man with bad game, not communication itself.
Again, you need to do a thread on how to make texting exciting.

rascal99v said:
So, would you go around saying "Phone Calls Kill Relationships"? Would you say that "Talking to chicks on a date Kills Relationships"? Men who don't know what they are doing Kill Relationships because they have no game and don't know what they are doing. You can say that for any type of communication.
Like Harry said, the main problem with texting is it can easily be misinterpreted and I along the train of thought that texting is counter productive to the socially inept because they can use texting as a crutch as opposed to calling which forces one to be social.

rascal99v said:
I've fvcked chicks only using text and I've never heard their voice until I saw them in person. Those chicks were interested in banging and it didn't matter what I used to communicate with them.
How many did you bang and how did they look?

rascal99v said:
I prefer a phone call to set up a date,
Why?
 
Last edited:

adam225

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
730
Reaction score
32
Location
UK
GotED? said:
Damn Rex - Did You Eat Your Wheaties This Morning Or Something??
Lol, brilliant. :crackup:

I still think men shouldn't be analysing this stuff too deeply (real men anyway). I'm sticking by being yourself and not being so outcome dependent.
 

JoeMarron

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
64
Age
33
Lol I originally ignored this thread because I thought it was just going to be another lame texting debate but it turned out to be quite entertaining. It seems to me like everyone is mostly on the same page, I doubt anyone here would advocate constant texting. The arguments are coming from preferences, some dudes like to text while some don't. OP made a good point, there's more than one way to game a woman. You may not care for texting but respect the fact that some men use texting and do it very well.

The advice "texting kills relationships" is good advice because most dudes are dumb asses. It's easier to just tell them not to text at all than to teach them how to text and risk them fvcking it up. That being said many of you guys are underestimating the power of words. I remember bukowski_merit making an excellent point on this and I'll link it if I manage to find it. If words weren't powerful then novels and poetry wouldn't exist. Think about all the powerful emotions that have been evoked through writing throughout human history. Yes mere words on a screen can evoke emotions in women, it can turn them on, it can raise interest, hell it can even make them fall in love.
 

GotED?

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
828
Reaction score
99
Location
The Viagra Pill you wish you had...- United Kingdo
JoeMarron said:
If words weren't powerful then novels and poetry wouldn't exist. Think about all the powerful emotions that have been evoked through writing throughout human history. Yes mere words on a screen can evoke emotions in women, it can turn them on, it can raise interest, hell it can even make them fall in love.
TRUE

Why women read BULLSH!T like 'Fifty Shades of Gray' to get themselves wet.
 

Tell her a little about yourself, but not too much. Maintain some mystery. Give her something to think about and wonder about when she's at home.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

usernamedox11

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
699
Reaction score
139
I agree. Texting works very well with the 18-24 crowd. I got a girl to break up with her boyfriend and tell me she loves me over text without ever hanging out with her.

Look at the average 18-24 year old female walking around. You'll likely see them looking down at their phone. They also have the attention span of a 2 year old in combination with the memory recall abilities of someone with alzheimer disease. If you aren't texting, some other guy is texting them and they'll forget about you. And if they aren't texting, they are checking their facebook, twitter, vine or instagram feed. Or maybe they are taking dumb selfies of themselves with them puckering their lips to put on their instagram. Maybe they are snapchatting or messaging other people on kik and whatsapp.

Point is they've got lots of sources of stimulation on their phone and they can forget about guys quite easily with all the other sources of male attention they get on their little devices. That's why texting is OK. They're on their phones all day, anyway. As long as you differentiate yourself from other men and have tight text game, you will do just fine texting.
 

penkitten

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 14, 2001
Messages
8,270
Reaction score
244
Age
47
Location
at our house
The old forum would not let me rep you at the time but i always wanted to thank you for the nice things you said on my behalf. Now this nifty new forum will let me.
 
Top