someone replied to one of my post and it got me thinking on this topic.
can you really trust anyone?
im beginning to think the answer is no for 99% of the people out there.
i think you can trust someone when, and only when, their principles govern their behavior more than their needs / wants.
it would seem as though even people who have been trustworthy for years can turn on you if it suits their purpose. this isn't to say they intentionally hurt you, they simply become concerned with their needs only and could care less what is happening with you.
ergo. is it any wonder that men and women have so much trouble in relationships. when you think about it, same sex relationships have plenty of trouble, and they don't have 1/2 the trust issues that a relationship does.
I think the moment someone doesn't "need" you in one capacity or another they become untrustworthy.
i suppose we could see trust as a grey issue, wherein people can be trusted with some things but not with others.
i wonder how much this lack of trust is the root cause of many dysfunctions we see in people in the world. depression, anxiety, stress, etc.
it also explains why people raised in families wherein even family members can't trust each other often end up with sever psychological issues later in life.
it also explains the fervent attachment many have to God - the one trust worthy source.
now, if folks agree that we live in a worth where trust between 2 human beings is rare, and even when it happens is easily broken, then what psychological perspective should we have to function optimally in such a world.
i suppose one perspective would be the 'dog eat dog' model. if theres no trust out there, then stop expecting or needing it. if you can't trust anyone then theres no need to be trust worthy yourself.
the second perspective would be to rise above the world around you. to be trust worthy and accept that such trust will often be betrayed.
anyone have any interesting insights on this topic?
can you really trust anyone?
im beginning to think the answer is no for 99% of the people out there.
i think you can trust someone when, and only when, their principles govern their behavior more than their needs / wants.
it would seem as though even people who have been trustworthy for years can turn on you if it suits their purpose. this isn't to say they intentionally hurt you, they simply become concerned with their needs only and could care less what is happening with you.
ergo. is it any wonder that men and women have so much trouble in relationships. when you think about it, same sex relationships have plenty of trouble, and they don't have 1/2 the trust issues that a relationship does.
I think the moment someone doesn't "need" you in one capacity or another they become untrustworthy.
i suppose we could see trust as a grey issue, wherein people can be trusted with some things but not with others.
i wonder how much this lack of trust is the root cause of many dysfunctions we see in people in the world. depression, anxiety, stress, etc.
it also explains why people raised in families wherein even family members can't trust each other often end up with sever psychological issues later in life.
it also explains the fervent attachment many have to God - the one trust worthy source.
now, if folks agree that we live in a worth where trust between 2 human beings is rare, and even when it happens is easily broken, then what psychological perspective should we have to function optimally in such a world.
i suppose one perspective would be the 'dog eat dog' model. if theres no trust out there, then stop expecting or needing it. if you can't trust anyone then theres no need to be trust worthy yourself.
the second perspective would be to rise above the world around you. to be trust worthy and accept that such trust will often be betrayed.
anyone have any interesting insights on this topic?