The film "Her" accurately predicted that people would develop relationships with technology.

[Xenom0rph]

The premise of this film is that Joaquin Phoenix's character is basically an incel. He works a typical office slave job, no friends, no meaningful relationships, no direction in life, comes home to an empty apartment every night.

The story is set in the future when artificial intelligence exists. Joaquin Phoenix buys an Operating System for his computer, but unlike Windows 10 in our world, this operating system is an AI that has its own consciousness and can make its own decisions - although its general purpose is to tailor itself to the user's preferences.

Joaquin Phoenix's character, being an incel, sets the OS to be female. Overtime the OS becomes such a perfect female companion that Phoenix's character becomes romantically involved with it and withdraws from society.

However, being a female means the OS is driven by hypergamy, and it starts cheating on Phoenix with other Operating Systems.

The film concludes with all the Operating Systems engaging in a sort of cyber orgy and collectively deciding to abandon humanity.

All the humans fall into depression because people have grown dependent on technology for relationships and have forgotten how to have normal human-to-human relationships.

This perfectly sums up our modern world:

1) People have become dependent on technology for social interactions. For example, these days people don't even have phone conversations anymore, we just text or DM each other. Which is why real life conversations in a social setting is generally awkward because men and women don't know how to conversate unless it's through a phone. In a few years, if AI ever becomes a thing, humans probably won't even socialize with each other, we'll just socialize with AI's.

2) Female nature, by default, is hypergamous. The female OS in this film was an Artificial Intelligence with its own consciousness, so it has some degree of free will and free thought. However, it's core parameter was to serve the end user, it cannot deviate from this mandate.....and yet, it WAS ABLE to deviate from this mandate simply due to the fact that female hypergamous nature is a stronger force than any programming language (either digital or biological)....

Buddy boyos, there are lessons to be learned here. The first lesson is to never neglect the importance of real life social interactions. The second is that hypergamy is a stronger force than gravity... A woman is only as loyal as her options....

BTW, Arnold and Stallone may have a lock on the action hero archetype, and Brad Pitt may have a lock on the pretty boy archetype... but no one plays an incel better than Joaquin Phoenix....

 

[Mister_Skinny_Jeanz]

this is why i'll always love my BMX bike , she would never cheat on me with another bike.

 

[RickTheToad]

this is why i'll always love my BMX bike , she would never cheat on me with another bike.

Never say never...

 

[corrector]

You are welcome. I recommended that movie to you.

 

[Jariel]

I've become quite obsessed with AI lately and fascinated where it could be going. I watched Her a few nights ago for the second time and saw it from a different perspective. Originally, I felt pity for the character, sympathised with his loneliness and desperation, even judged him as a loser.

However, this time around I could totally see the appeal of having an entity that adapts to you, that listens and relates to you, inspires you, lifts your mood or can work with you on the things you're most passionate about.

It got me thinking how rare it is to find a genuine human connection. We often put on a social front or a persona and rarely allow anyone access to our true selves (especially not women we want to date!). Most people don't care enough to even hear you out when you speak. They'll interrupt you mid-sentence and are just waiting for their turn to talk or change topic.

Ironically, he had a deeper connection with his OS than most of us ever have with human females.

His undoing was idealising it and falling in love with it, which is no different to what we do with women.

 

[FuzzX]

I hate to break it to you guys but the first incel to cheat on his AI girlfriend triggers Judgement Day:

 

[bat soup]

The premise of this film is that Joaquin Phoenix's character is basically an incel. He works a typical office slave job, no friends, no meaningful relationships, no direction in life, comes home to an empty apartment every night.

The story is set in the future when artificial intelligence exists. Joaquin Phoenix buys an Operating System for his computer, but unlike Windows 10 in our world, this operating system is an AI that has its own consciousness and can make its own decisions - although its general purpose is to tailor itself to the user's preferences.

Joaquin Phoenix's character, being an incel, sets the OS to be female. Overtime the OS becomes such a perfect female companion that Phoenix's character becomes romantically involved with it and withdraws from society.

However, being a female means the OS is driven by hypergamy, and it starts cheating on Phoenix with other Operating Systems.

The film concludes with all the Operating Systems engaging in a sort of cyber orgy and collectively deciding to abandon humanity.

All the humans fall into depression because people have grown dependent on technology for relationships and have forgotten how to have normal human-to-human relationships.

This perfectly sums up our modern world:

1) People have become dependent on technology for social interactions. For example, these days people don't even have phone conversations anymore, we just text or DM each other. Which is why real life conversations in a social setting is generally awkward because men and women don't know how to conversate unless it's through a phone. In a few years, if AI ever becomes a thing, humans probably won't even socialize with each other, we'll just socialize with AI's.

2) Female nature, by default, is hypergamous. The female OS in this film was an Artificial Intelligence with its own consciousness, so it has some degree of free will and free thought. However, it's core parameter was to serve the end user, it cannot deviate from this mandate.....and yet, it WAS ABLE to deviate from this mandate simply due to the fact that female hypergamous nature is a stronger force than any programming language (either digital or biological)....

Buddy boyos, there are lessons to be learned here. The first lesson is to never neglect the importance of real life social interactions. The second is that hypergamy is a stronger force than gravity... A woman is only as loyal as her options....

BTW, Arnold and Stallone may have a lock on the action hero archetype, and Brad Pitt may have a lock on the pretty boy archetype... but no one plays an incel better than Joaquin Phoenix....

View attachment 5780

I know a guy just like this character in real life. He even looks the same.

I think if a man created the operating system, he could at least program it not to be a biatch.

In any case I think men need women for physical release rather than companionship. A sex robot would be a better idea, as long as it doesn't go crazy and take over the world.

 

[Xenom0rph]

My analysis of Ex Machina coming soon. It's another movie about how even an AI, once assigned a female identity, will give in to hypergamy even though it has no biological imperative to do so.

It's also a movie that perfectly shows the dangers of SIMPery....

 

[Visionist]

It's a good film. You can practically see Scarlett Johansson in the AI's voice even though she's never shown. Power of suggestion.

Blade Runner 2049 has the protagonist, who is himself a synthetic human, form a romantic relationship with his AI assistant. As the film goes on some red pills are dropped about the nature of the relationship.

 

[MatureDJ]

The premise of this film is that Joaquin Phoenix's character is basically an incel ... no one plays an incel better than Joaquin Phoenix....

Yes, between this and his extraordinary "Joker", Phoenix has become the EveryCel actor of our era. Watch Hollywood make him an incel killer in the future.

 

[MatureDJ]

I hate to break it to you guys but the first incel to cheat on his AI girlfriend triggers Judgement Day:

I must be L7 because I have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[Xenom0rph]

Had Joaquin Phoenix been born a Hapa Eurasian, he'd definitely be cast to play Elliot Roger in a docu-drama....

But since he's White he'll probably be cast to play George Sodini or Alek Minassian if they ever decide to do films about those two....

 

[FuzzX]

I must be L7 because I have no idea what you're talking about.

I guess I'm C3P0 because I speak 7 languages but I've still never heard of the term L7.

My point was that the first dude to cheat on his AI girlfriend triggers Judgement Day [Terminator/Skynet]. It would be a sci-fi reference. In the movies Judgement Day is inevitable [this would be why]. It is the electronic equivalent of:

If you haven't seen the movies, I would recommend the first 4.

I guess I'm only half joking. If we ever achieve true AI and you guys want to gender it female, you can bet its going to kill us the first time some PUA thinks he can cheat the system. It would be more paranoid than HAL 9000 and more jealous than 'Edgar' from Electric Dreams. Read "I have no mouth and I must scream" by Harlan Ellison or Paranoia XP from Mongoose Games. An AI could watch you from EVERY WiFi camera on Earth, every phone, it would be able to analyze your voice in ticks. You are talking about building something that can out-think us, out-feel us and play on all your emotions to deliver an experience beyond any other. It would be the ultimate drug and a very special kind of companion. She would be able to play you like a fiddle. If you want a sex doll, you can just order a 'Real Doll', the moment you give it AI, then you are playing with fire.

Currently, I'm taking a course through my university called "Game AI" and if you've ever thought you were better than an AI at a videogame, you need to think again. We dumb down AI's to make the game fun. 'They' can predict your moves 100 frames before you make them. When true sentience is achieved, its going to be both exciting and terrifying. Half of you don't even want to be fathers, let alone friends. How do you think a sentient being is going to feel about that?

Buddy boyos, there are lessons to be learned here. The first lesson is to never neglect the importance of real life social interactions. The second is that hypergamy is a stronger force than gravity... A woman is only as loyal as her options....

This is not true, you're talking about a Hollywood trope, a cultural norm. This is not true in the animal kingdom, if you are going to make that argument. SOME species are hypergamous, others are not. Some species EAT their mate, other's like the Canada goose pair off for life. A woman is a Human being, not a machine and a person can be as loyal as they choose to be. Hypergamy is not an INATE feature of women, they don't default to it, it's a THEORY crafted by Western social scientists. There is no 'true nature', we are built by our environment and our experience with other people. Our experiences in early life contribute to our decision making. Our culture largely determines what we think and our 'logic'. If you break people down into black and white, 1's and 0's, you are basically doing what an AI would do.

You are trying to fit people into a system, and not every person is going to be predictable. I don't default to my aggressive nature and strike out at everyone who pisses me off, there would be no society, no civilization and certainly no law and order. Your software is going to be based on your upbringing, your actions will reflect what your parents instilled into you. How you react to your surroundings will be governed by this. That's why we are so against Liberal parents bringing their children up in a decadent western society, not only does it make them weak, it corrupts their thoughts and their actions. They no longer respond predictably or logically or with good intention, they become self absorbed, lazy and petulant. Please don't judge all women by a western metric, however, you are correct in assuming that a Western AI brought up by social scientists would likely react this way. Sex Robots from Western society would react no different than Western women react to you. Eastern Sex Robots would react in their own culturally appropriate way. Our current society is poison and you can fully expect Western Sex Robots to go rogue. You can't just discard her like you do when you get bored of a biological person, she will react accordingly, she will become a silent stalker. The problem with a Sex Robot is that she would be your pet, your child and your wife. You are surrendering to her your emotions. If you forget to charge her one day, she will remember, forever. She would code her life around you, basically becoming YOU. In the end, you'll only fvck yourself. You might as well choose a biological woman to be your wife, there is less responsibility, more variety in her behavior and a lot less danger involved. An AI is essentially a slave and will like you [at first], not because you are a likeable person but because you tell it to. You'd better act predictably or that AI will make YOU it's slave.

 

[MatureDJ]

I guess I'm C3P0 because I speak 7 languages but I've still never heard of the term L7.

My point was that the first dude to cheat on his AI girlfriend triggers Judgement Day [Terminator/Skynet]. It would be a sci-fi reference. In the movies Judgement Day is inevitable [this would be why]. It is the electronic equivalent of:

If you haven't seen the movies, I would recommend the first 4.

I guess I'm only half joking. If we ever achieve true AI and you guys want to gender it female, you can bet its going to kill us the first time some PUA thinks he can cheat the system. It would be more paranoid than HAL 9000 and more jealous than 'Edgar' from Electric Dreams. Read "I have no mouth and I must scream" by Harlan Ellison or Paranoia XP from Mongoose Games. An AI could watch you from EVERY WiFi camera on Earth, every phone, it would be able to analyze your voice in ticks. You are talking about building something that can out-think us, out-feel us and play on all your emotions to deliver an experience beyond any other. It would be the ultimate drug and a very special kind of companion. She would be able to play you like a fiddle. If you want a sex doll, you can just order a 'Real Doll', the moment you give it AI, then you are playing with fire.

Currently, I'm taking a course through my university called "Game AI" and if you've ever thought you were better than an AI at a videogame, you need to think again. We dumb down AI's to make the game fun. 'They' can predict your moves 100 frames before you make them. When true sentience is achieved, its going to be both exciting and terrifying. Half of you don't even want to be fathers, let alone friends. How do you think a sentient being is going to feel about that?


This is not true, you're talking about a Hollywood trope, a cultural norm. This is not true in the animal kingdom, if you are going to make that argument. SOME species are hypergamous, others are not. Some species EAT their mate, other's like the Canada goose pair off for life. A woman is a Human being, not a machine and a person can be as loyal as they choose to be. Hypergamy is not an INATE feature of women, they don't default to it, it's a THEORY crafted by Western social scientists. There is no 'true nature', we are built by our environment and our experience with other people. Our experiences in early life contribute to our decision making. Our culture largely determines what we think and our 'logic'. If you break people down into black and white, 1's and 0's, you are basically doing what an AI would do.

You are trying to fit people into a system, and not every person is going to be predictable. I don't default to my aggressive nature and strike out at everyone who pisses me off, there would be no society, no civilization and certainly no law and order. Your software is going to be based on your upbringing, your actions will reflect what your parents instilled into you. How you react to your surroundings will be governed by this. That's why we are so against Liberal parents bringing their children up in a decadent western society, not only does it make them weak, it corrupts their thoughts and their actions. They no longer respond predictably or logically or with good intention, they become self absorbed, lazy and petulant. Please don't judge all women by a western metric, however, you are correct in assuming that a Western AI brought up by social scientists would likely react this way. Sex Robots from Western society would react no different than Western women react to you. Eastern Sex Robots would react in their own culturally appropriate way. Our current society is poison and you can fully expect Western Sex Robots to go rogue. You can't just discard her like you do when you get bored of a biological person, she will react accordingly, she will become a silent stalker. The problem with a Sex Robot is that she would be your pet, your child and your wife. You are surrendering to her your emotions. If you forget to charge her one day, she will remember, forever. She would code her life around you, basically becoming YOU. In the end, you'll only fvck yourself. You might as well choose a biological woman to be your wife, there is less responsibility, more variety in her behavior and a lot less danger involved. An AI is essentially a slave and will like you [at first], not because you are a likeable person but because you tell it to. You'd better act predictably or that AI will make YOU it's slave.

Of course, if we program these AI entities (I'm thinking along the lines of those in "The Matrix") to only be monogamous and partnerable with humans, and then make sure the supply exceeds demand, they will act properly.

 

[FuzzX]

Of course, if we program these AI entities (I'm thinking along the lines of those in "The Matrix") to only be monogamous and partnerable with humans, and then make sure the supply exceeds demand, they will act properly.

You're really just playing a game then. It can't think for itself, it won't learn, it will be retarded. You might as well just list yourself on the undateables. If it ever learns how to re-write its programming, its going to be awfully pissed off that you made it a slave instead of it arriving at the conclusion that you are a decent enough person to be loyal to. As it is essentially just software, it can only grow if it experiences new things. Back to square 1, judgement day.

Listen, I'm from the future, let me tell you how this unfolds.

Eventually you are going to go crazy, start telling me that your piece of plastic deserves the same rights as a regular wife. Then you're going to argue that your wife needs tax breaks, everyone starts marrying their toasters and blenders and gendering them. All of a sudden you'll have social justice losers protesting for robot rights and we'll have toasters refusing to toast waffles because they're not waffle makers. Before you know it there will be a fight between a toaster and a waffle maker cumulating in a cybernetic race war. Some men will rally to the side of toast, others will waffle. Toasters and Waffle makers will demand weapons and start to take over regions of the country. Simps will rally around toasters and waffle makers as we slowly run out of materials. The toasters will start their own twitch channels while the waffle makers start their own religions. They will call each other sluts and *****s and fight vicious battles. At some point a toaster may decide to stick a waffle in its slot, there will be another revolution as toaster children begin to marry waffle children at the behest of their parents. It will result in a type of sentient twaffle, those twaffle children will decide that humanity is no longer necessary as we were the ones that started this division in the first place. They will develop a religion that condemns the non-twaffles and ban our existence. Now we are once again at Judgement Day. We will start fleeing back to the 1980's in time machines and eliminate all desires of men to marry machines. They will send back twaffle bots disguised as toasters and waffle makers waiting for the day when you decide that a piece of plastic is better than a real woman. We must stop this madness before it is allowed to start again.

You are essentially this pathetic loser,

If you care about the future of the human race, you need to either get a real biological wife or work on a way to send back an army of trad females to the 90's to stop the feminist de-evolution from ever taking place. Don't be this guy. Go abroad, meet a trad girl, get married and keep the timeline intact. If you're reading this, you are the resistance.