When I was refering to the "majority" of women , I was refering specifically to hot ones. I should have stated like I normally do, "the majority of hot women" to make myself better understood. The majority of hot women don't give a crap about a man's looks.
I'm assuming that you have the statistical evidence to back this up, correct? Because I totally don't believe you.
Now, you're right, I'm sure some of these hotties that you see with ugly dudes, are escorts. But I would highly speculate that only a small portion of the women with these men, are escorts.
Again, what percentage specifically? What you are saying is what scientific people call "hand waving" wherein you present a hypothesis with no facts. 'Highly speculating' something is equivalent to is being completely wrong. Unless you have facts to back that up.
There are just far too many hot women out there with ugly guys for this to usually be the case. Only a very small percentage would have to be escorts.
Well, your other option is that the men are either rich or have high status. Remember, you only have 3 options if you want to keep hot girls: Be an attractive male, be rich, have high status. If you do not possess any of these qualities, the girl is guaranteed to cheat on you and leave you for someone who does.
And dude, you're wayyyyyyyyyy off base if you think hot women give it up to ugly dudes out of pity...way off base.
Really? So you are saying that the trophy wife who fvcks the pool boy every week and her husband once a year is not allowing her husband entry into her vag out of pity?
That has to be one of the worst statements I've heard on this forum in all the 6 yrs I've been coming here, and I've heard some bad, bad sh*t over the yrs. If that were the case, then why haven't "I", AN ACTUAL GOOD-LOOKING GUY WHO GOES OUT CONSECUTIVELY EVERY WEEKEND, gotten laid(excluding the use of escorts, as well as high-end prostitutes from Amsterdam) in over 2 yrs? Bet ya can't answer that one.
Sure I can. Because you suck. Either you think that you are attractive (but really are not) or you lack one or more of the other 2 qualities that females judge you upon. In your case, it honestly sounds like you have a case of "misplaced confidence." Where you are super confident but have nothing to be confident in. This is a common occurrence in PUA groups. Many of the males who are able to talk to girls and might get lucky once in a while are not capable of keeping a hottie. This is because the girl was effectively 'tricked' into liking the guy because she thought that he was more successful or had more status than he actually did. He put forth all the subconscious cues that indicate he was either wealthy or high status without actually having the things that those cues are a result of. When she found out that the guy was nothing more than some average joe, she bails. Sound familiar?
Why are so many guys undersexed out there if this were the case, who flood pick-up artist sites like these complaining how they can't bed attractive women? I'd like to hear a solid, well-developed answer from you.
This may surprise you. I think that the vast majority of normal, friendly males are not as concerned with getting laid as the males who frequent PUA websites. They are far too involved with their hobbies, friends and general lifestyle to worry for one second about "getting a hottie." One of the best things I have ever read from this site is this:
BEFORE THE INTERNET, COOL GUYS GOT LAID, AFTER THE INTERNET, COOL GUYS STILL GET LAID-- this may be slightly off in accuracy.
This is such a powerful statement. It says, in no uncertain terms that what females want has not changed. The females want the guys who do not have to try. And rightfully so, as we males want the females who are genetically superior to their peers. We don't want the girl who "is losing weight" , we want the blonde hotties who have already risen to the top of the food chain and command attention from every male without trying. I stopped coming to this site for a month (nov)-- and during that month, I got a new job in a different city, a new life, new house, 2 girlfriends and fvcked 5 different new girls. In short, at that moment, I was the cool guy. I was the guy who had accomplished all his goals and was confident because I had something to be confident in. I was the leader, the hero, the alpha male all in one. And I wasn't faking it one bit, it was all natural.
Now, on to your second assertion: that some men are "undersexed"...This is interesting to me. A logical person would immediately ask "how much sex is one male entitled to in his lifetime?" The answer is- zero. Since the dawn of time, the females have chosen which genes are to be carried on through time and which genes are dead ends. It may just be that females have decided that some male members of society would better serve the world if they did not exist in the first place. Thus, their progeny would be better served not existing in the first place. I would make the assertion that a large percentage of the males on PUA sites have difficulty securing an attractive mate because they are genetically inferior and should not procreate. Thus, the females are aware of this deficiency and stay as far away from them as possible to negate the chance that sex will occur. In short, they are not "undersexed", they are "appropriately sexed" based on their genetic value.
Women don't give a sh*t how undersexed a guy is. They don't care about you period.
That's not true, women want to be with someone who has the greatest amount of natural resources so that her progeny will have the greatest chance of survival. If you are speaking in the absolute sense, where women perceive men as "companions", then you are right. They don't give a sh1t.
That's the way they are. The greater majority of them are evil(yup I said "evil") sociopaths who honestly don't give a f*ck about you. The evolutionary psychologists here try to defend their behavior as "it's not their fault, it's how they're wired". Give me a brake, nobody is "wired" to purposefully harm others.
Again, you lack any data to back this up. The fact is that "others" is a term limited to those with acceptable genes for procreation. If you are a male who lacks those genes, then you are not considered a peer, but merely an object in the way of the females securing a desirable male. It is the males duty to be superior to those around him, or face a life of mediocrity. Along with mediocrity comes failed relationships, infidelity, uncertainty, disappointment and PUA websites.
Each and every one of us is aware of right and wrong, and knows that we shouldn't do wrong unto others.
This is total BS. "right" and "wrong" are simply a matter of timing. At one point in time, it was "right" to burn any female who could read. At another point in time, it was "right" to kill any black people who wandered outside their owners plantation. At another point in time, it was "right" to throw male infants off a cliff if they seemed inferior. Currently, depending on which country you are in and which religion you practice, it is "right" to bomb anyone who thinks that their god is better than your god.
The bottom line is that life isn't fair. Its not supposed to be, so if you got the short end of the stick, you had better take away someone elses stick or get used to a life of misery.
It's so basic.
