"The Expendables" a dealy hit to masculne men in Hollywood movies

[evan12]

I watched both movies of "The Expendables" and it was really disappointing of how the director showed all these action men as pussies , especially in The Expendables 2 . here is some of the points :

1- they seem very hungry sexually and it seem women didn't allow them to have sex with them like how the movies was ended before , but they get rejected to their sexual advances .
2- they talk about love and relationships like women .
3- they act like kids (and one of them was playing by kids toys ) .
4- they are unsure and have a low confidant . some times the scene make you feel they are a bunch of losers .
5- they talk a lot like women .
6- women are not attracted to them .

Now did you surprise to notice same things was showed in "Sky Fall" .

 

[goodfoot]

I watched both movies of "The Expendables" and it was really disappointing of how the director showed all these action men as pussies , especially in The Expendables 2 . here is some of the points :

1- they seem very hungry sexually and it seem women didn't allow them to have sex with them like how the movies was ended before , but they get rejected to their sexual advances .
2- they talk about love and relationships like women .
3- they act like kids (and one of them was playing by kids toys ) .
4- they are unsure and have a low confidant . some times the scene make you feel they are a bunch of losers .
5- they talk a lot like women .
6- women are not attracted to them .

Now did you surprise to notice same things was showed in "Sky Fall" .

I can somewhat agree with Expendables, but Bond was still on top of his game in Skyfall. He pulled the asian chick, and I felt he handled the homosexual advances of Silva in a calm, DJ kind of way.

 

[evan12]

I can somewhat agree with Expendables, but Bond was still on top of his game in Skyfall. He pulled the asian chick, and I felt he handled the homosexual advances of Silva in a calm, DJ kind of way.

man , bond in skyfall was completely pvssy , he was unsure /unconfidant/ not satisfied sexually , and he failed to seduce that black girl .
also it seem both bond and that bad guy did a lot to get approval of that old woman .I didnt even complete the movie

 

[Burroughs]

This is no surprise

Hollywood is run by predatory jewish faggots

Today, Western Civilisation has been so debauched by the Global Elite and its lackeys and Useful Idiots in the Liberal Establishment that it is now a Corrupt Liberal Order.

Moreover, once great sovereign nations are Corrupt Liberal Democracies. Wherein the inversion of morality has also allowed dishonest intellectuals to similarly invert Truth without the outcry such an affront on common sense warrants.

Double standards, untruths and lies are intrinsic to the Humanist Agenda that turns Truth on its head.

They are the watchwords especially of the activists and proselytisers in the campaign to normalise homosexuality. Thus, the Liberal Establishment and its lackeys declare that the "radicals," no matter how violent or unsavoury, represent the forces of "tolerance" and "compassion."

On the other hand, traditionalists, however peaceful and benign, are portrayed as agents of "hate." "repression" and "violence."

 

[yougottaknow90]

This is no surprise

Hollywood is run by predatory jewish faggots

Today, Western Civilisation has been so debauched by the Global Elite and its lackeys and Useful Idiots in the Liberal Establishment that it is now a Corrupt Liberal Order.

Moreover, once great sovereign nations are Corrupt Liberal Democracies. Wherein the inversion of morality has also allowed dishonest intellectuals to similarly invert Truth without the outcry such an affront on common sense warrants.

Double standards, untruths and lies are intrinsic to the Humanist Agenda that turns Truth on its head.

They are the watchwords especially of the activists and proselytisers in the campaign to normalise homosexuality. Thus, the Liberal Establishment and its lackeys declare that the "radicals," no matter how violent or unsavoury, represent the forces of "tolerance" and "compassion."

On the other hand, traditionalists, however peaceful and benign, are portrayed as agents of "hate." "repression" and "violence."

First bold: unnecessary.

Second bold: Nothing wrong with homosexuality. Absolutely nothing, especially given that it is not a choice. What, do you really think people wake up in the morning and ask themselves how to get beat up more often?

Also, lol @ what you chose to capitalize. You sound like a conspiracy theorist.

 

[Purefilth]

man , bond in skyfall was completely pvssy , he was unsure /unconfidant/ not satisfied sexually , and he failed to seduce that black girl .
also it seem both bond and that bad guy did a lot to get approval of that old woman .I didnt even complete the movie

The black girl is Miss Moneypenny. Any MAN should know that theres been svxual tension existing between Bond and Moneypenny since Dr. No.


You are watching scripted films that are made for Entertainment and trying to compare them to life. Sh1t dont work that way.

BTW Bond was Badass - He would FVCK YOU UP!!!!!:box:

 

[Burroughs]

First bold: unnecessary.

.

jimmies rustled eh?

You must be a faggot jew :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

 

[3countriesPlan]

lol this forum has gotten really offensive lately. lovin it.. sick of all the moderated crap

 

[Bokanovsky]

BTW Bond was Badass - He would FVCK YOU UP!!!!!:box:

Skyfall was really disappointing. Bond was portrayed as an approval seeking beta male with serious mommy issues. Not a single thing about him could be described as suave.

 

[stevejabba]

I think you're taking things a bit too seriously...LOL

Who cares anyway? Llive life on your own terms

 

[LiveFreeX]

yes also loving it!

Couldn't even get through 1/4 of skyfall it was so boring, same goes for Casino Royale.

Expendables was ok except for the 'romance', even my wife was yelling at the TV screen calling the guy a loser. We liked it for the rest of the action though, that was quite cool but I don't think they really developed the characters apart from that and was a bit sad to see dolph lundgrun taken out so quickly, I really liked him in He-Man, I come in peace and that movie about the renegade biker gang...those were friggin cool movies... even He-man never turned into a chode for Teela... that's how much films have changed in 20 odd years. The films and TV today are so fem centric, you can almost predict the plot line for every single show and movie by focusing somehow on a female character. That's generally why I still prefer the older 80's movies to the newer crap... flashy effects are fine but when the 'romance' portion kicks in, its all down hill from there. I only need to cite Star Wars the clone wars, that movie was great from start to finish, except for the one 'romance part'. Had they left that out, I would've been a happy camper. That was almost 10 years ago, now movies are built almost completely of romance and a little action/sci-fi thrown in to keep the men happy. Look at the latest Transformers film, they made the main character into an approval seeking dink, the first movie was slightly skewed this way but we thought it was because he was a bit of a nerd... I'd be surprised if the new one doesn't cast him as a full on homo driving around in a pink Jeep that transforms into a feminst slogan spouting robot. I really liked JJ Abrams new take on Star Trek, was happy to see that there wasn't very much 'female involvement', I hope the new Star Wars turns out the same.

The guy who played Starbuck in the original Battle Star Galactica talked about this in his blog.

Women are from Venus. Men are from Mars. Hamlet does not scan as Hamletta. Nor does Hans Solo as Hans Sally. Faceman is not the same as Facewoman. Nor does a Stardoe a Starbuck make. Men hand out cigars. Women "hand out" babies. And thus the world for thousands of years has gone 'round.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/01/starbuck_strike.html

 

[yougottaknow90]

jimmies rustled eh?

You must be a faggot jew :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

Incorrect, you f*cking imbecile.

Do something better with your time rather than embarrassing yourself with posts full of forced vocabulary on the boards.

And lol @ you being a conspiracy theorist.

 

[evan12]

BTW Bond was Badass - He would FVCK YOU UP!!!!!:box:

average guy when stay a lone with a woman can have more success that what bond in skyfall did , I think he only able to fvck some one like you :crackup: .

 

[Burroughs]

Incorrect, you f*cking imbecile.

Awwww that's cute the faggot jew is mad :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

 

[yougottaknow90]

Awwww that's cute the faggot is mad :crackup: :crackup: :crackup:

Lol, dumbass.

 

[Burroughs]

Lol, dumbass.

u so mad faggot jew :rock:

 

[bigneil]

Sadly, the whole world is run by faggot Jews. They're called Federal Reserve Banksters.

 

[Bokanovsky]

Sadly, the whole world is run by faggot Jews.

Well, you could always convert and start playing for the other team to get in on the action

 

[Purefilth]

average guy when stay a lone with a woman can have more success that what bond in skyfall did , I think he only able to fvck some one like you :crackup: .

But then the average guy wouldnt be concentrating on saving the world then, would he

 

[( . )( . )]

Second bold: Nothing wrong with homosexuality. Absolutely nothing, especially given that it is not a choice. What, do you really think people wake up in the morning and ask themselves how to get beat up more often?

Wrong.

TLDR: last paragraph.

“23% of now-grown children of families with a lesbian mother said ‘yes’ to “Ever touched sexually by parent/adult“, versus 6% of those of families with a gay father and only 2% of those now-grown children from traditional mom-dad, Ozzie-Harriet families.
31% of now-grown children of families with a lesbian mother said ‘yes’ to “Ever forced to have sex against will“, versus 25% of those of families with a gay father and only 8% of those now-grown children from traditional mom-dad families.
12% of now-grown children of families with a lesbian mother said ‘yes’ to “Thought recently about suicide“, versus 24% of those of families with a gay father and only 5% of those now-grown children from traditional mom-dad families.
And perhaps the worst of all (to Regenrus’s career prospects) only 61% of now-grown children of families with a lesbian mother said ‘yes’ to “Identifies as entirely heterosexual“, versus 71% of those of families with a gay father and with a full 90% of those now-grown children from traditional mom-dad families. So much for theories that acculturation plays no role!”

http://unitedfamiliesinternational.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/chart-from-washington-times1.jpg

For anyone else interested Regnerus's peer reviewed study is quite handy to throw back at liberal douchebags like this above guy. Also of note he was harassed and attacked by leftoids for months for this study, apparently they even had 200 scholars working to debunk his work and still failed.:crackup: