MatureDJ
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 11,293
- Reaction score
- 4,666
so using this logic , semen retention would make your life span longer ?Just finishing a book right now. Called “Lifespan”.
There are differences in age expectancy between men and women.
The genome isn’t interested in how long you live. Just that you live long enough to reproduce. The key is reproduce, “real sex”.
Here are two examples:
Women who don’t breast feed are more likely to die of cancer. Why? Well if she didn’t lactate because she hasn’t breast fed her kids, the genome “thinks” that none of her children survived. Thus she is unfit for her utility. Raising children.
Most men are married. By middle age, their wife’s do not want sex. Especially from him. So he no longer has real sex. What do you think happens? If he isn’t having sex, what does the genome “think”?
The way the world is trending we might all meet an early demise... I plan on releasing as much semen as possible.. would hate to deliberately retain it and get hit by a bus or drunk driver one day!so using this logic , semen retention would make your life span longer
The genome isnt sentient. I agree this is probably why incels are depressed (because in their biology they know they aren't fulfilling their destiny) but there's not an all-seeing genome god-being that strikes people with death if they aren't mating. At least I highly doubt it.I have no idea. With the logic I stated, if you stop having sex, the genome has no use for your existence. Sex, though recreational is still procreation to your genome.
Statistic have soundly proven that the longer you stay sexually active, the longer you live. Fact.
This study is off.
This doesn’t take into account that as a man you can have your own self-directed purposeWe all come with a purpose and a shelf life, once that purpose is either fulfilled or cannot be accomplished we start to deteriorate.
Thats why post wall women start physically falling apart as much as retired men become less and less useful to themselves and others.
Personally I would gladly live the life of a hero and die young than the other way around...old people with no purpose live like crap and are often baggage for others both family members and strangers.
I don't think he's been off gear since the 70s.I look at Sylvester Stallone.... no question he’s on testosterone...
So you're saying that there is no correlation between folks that are too sick to be sexually active and lifespan?I have no idea. With the logic I stated, if you stop having sex, the genome has no use for your existence. Sex, though recreational is still procreation to your genome.
Statistic have soundly proven that the longer you stay sexually active, the longer you live. Fact.
Worst shape I’ve ever seen him was Rocky 1.... I think that was 1976 lol!don't think he's been off gear since the 70s.
This is extremely interesting, where did you read about this? I want to learn more about this.Just finishing a book right now. Called “Lifespan”.
There are differences in age expectancy between men and women.
The genome isn’t interested in how long you live. Just that you live long enough to reproduce. The key is reproduce, “real sex”.
Here are two examples:
Women who don’t breast feed are more likely to die of cancer. Why? Well if she didn’t lactate because she hasn’t breast fed her kids, the genome “thinks” that none of her children survived. Thus she is unfit for her utility. Raising children.
Most men are married. By middle age, their wife’s do not want sex. Especially from him. So he no longer has real sex. What do you think happens? If he isn’t having sex, what does the genome “think”?
Don't always be the one putting yourself out for her. Don't always be the one putting all the effort and work into the relationship. Let her, and expect her, to treat you as well as you treat her, and to improve the quality of your life.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.