something for discussion...
an interesting topic when I think about it is what exactly indoctrinates men the most into the world of the AFC / Matrix?
i don't know if we can really blame the media as the #1 culprit. because the media shows just as many non AFC examples as AFC. i mean, take the jerry seinfield show for instance - the main character, Jerry, was a single 30 something man who wasn't chasing after marriage. take archie bunker... he was a sexist pig. you got rock stars that bang 1000s of women. etc.
the examples are endless. yes, these are offset by movies like Pretty Woman, but all in all, there are just as many non-AFC males in the media as there are AFC males.
is it the school system? i don't think so. i don't remember being indoctrinated one way or another in school when it came to relationships.
is it (classical) literature? i highly doubt it, as writers tend to be the most cynical when describing relationships over any other medium.
was it the church? they certainly played a role for sure. but now a days even regularly church goers temper the church doctrine with the practical truths we recognize today.
which leads me to perhaps the primary culprit. our mothers.
not to get freudian on everyone, but when you think about it, most of us grew up in households where mom relied on dad. i believe this, and the behavior we witnesses long before we even knew what it was, primes the male to see women as the weaker sex.
moreover, because our mothers were often emotional, while our fathers were stern, we see women as 'the prize'. women = love.
yes, none of this makes sense, but its what we grow up with. its what plugs us in to the matrix. this unrealistic view of women.
then as we become teenagers and you add on the sexual urge to screw women, you have the perfect storm.
completely unrealistic behavior becomes acceptable because
1) we witnesses our mothers exhibiting this behavior
2) we put women on the pedastal becuase our mothers were likely our primary source of emotional reinforcement growing up (ie. the one who made us 'feel' loved)
3) we ignore bad behavior in the hopes of getting laid.
what do you guys think? while this is a pretty far out there hypothesis, i believe that the vast majority of men who have problems with women do so because of some element relating to their mother.
i know this sounds pretty crazy (and perhaps even deflecting from personal accountability), but when you really think about it, its not so far fetched.
men who do naturally well with women seem to come from mothers who, while not detached, were strong positive independent figures in the household. while they nurtured their sons, they didn't overly rely on them, they didn't smother them, etc.
while men who do poorly with women seem to come from mothers who were emotionally unstable, manipulative, pessimistic / depressed, etc.
an interesting topic when I think about it is what exactly indoctrinates men the most into the world of the AFC / Matrix?
i don't know if we can really blame the media as the #1 culprit. because the media shows just as many non AFC examples as AFC. i mean, take the jerry seinfield show for instance - the main character, Jerry, was a single 30 something man who wasn't chasing after marriage. take archie bunker... he was a sexist pig. you got rock stars that bang 1000s of women. etc.
the examples are endless. yes, these are offset by movies like Pretty Woman, but all in all, there are just as many non-AFC males in the media as there are AFC males.
is it the school system? i don't think so. i don't remember being indoctrinated one way or another in school when it came to relationships.
is it (classical) literature? i highly doubt it, as writers tend to be the most cynical when describing relationships over any other medium.
was it the church? they certainly played a role for sure. but now a days even regularly church goers temper the church doctrine with the practical truths we recognize today.
which leads me to perhaps the primary culprit. our mothers.
not to get freudian on everyone, but when you think about it, most of us grew up in households where mom relied on dad. i believe this, and the behavior we witnesses long before we even knew what it was, primes the male to see women as the weaker sex.
moreover, because our mothers were often emotional, while our fathers were stern, we see women as 'the prize'. women = love.
yes, none of this makes sense, but its what we grow up with. its what plugs us in to the matrix. this unrealistic view of women.
then as we become teenagers and you add on the sexual urge to screw women, you have the perfect storm.
completely unrealistic behavior becomes acceptable because
1) we witnesses our mothers exhibiting this behavior
2) we put women on the pedastal becuase our mothers were likely our primary source of emotional reinforcement growing up (ie. the one who made us 'feel' loved)
3) we ignore bad behavior in the hopes of getting laid.
what do you guys think? while this is a pretty far out there hypothesis, i believe that the vast majority of men who have problems with women do so because of some element relating to their mother.
i know this sounds pretty crazy (and perhaps even deflecting from personal accountability), but when you really think about it, its not so far fetched.
men who do naturally well with women seem to come from mothers who, while not detached, were strong positive independent figures in the household. while they nurtured their sons, they didn't overly rely on them, they didn't smother them, etc.
while men who do poorly with women seem to come from mothers who were emotionally unstable, manipulative, pessimistic / depressed, etc.