If we are looking at ALL adult women (i.e. age 18 to 120), there is no way in hell that anywhere near 60% of them are attractive. Even if you consider how thirsty the average dude is, that is a bogus stat. Simply eliminating women who are two old and too fat to be attractive will likely get rid of 2/3 of the potential candidates.
I think he was referring to women 18 to 35.
I agree with Bobanovsky. Well, lets narrow it down. Ages 16 to 50. 16 due to depending on the state, and the rare 50 year old cougar who might still be decent. I'd say maybe 30 percent total. There is no way 60 percent of girls 35 and under are attractive. I don't see it. IRL I'd say it's more like 40 percent 35 and under are attractive. There is no way 60 percent of the population of women is attractive.
That because you are probably discrediting "cute" women who might be 10, 15, 20 lbs overweight. You are giving them a 5 and 6 rating (non-attractive) when in reality they should be 6.5 to 7 (attractive). I would say a good 20% of women are in this category.
I'm also talking lack of tattoos, piercings, their teeth, etc not just being a tad chubby. Even if they're not chubby they still don't have good teeth or covered in tats.
Teeth I agree with, but the tats don't bother me none if everything else is in place.
"Absolutely no probs, so if you take up the cheque for every single date till we have sex, that works for me"
This ^^.
Even that's a stretch. I'd say 10-20% of women under 35 are attractive, depending on location.
Wow, you must be ruling out everything under an 8 then.
Everything under a 7. Genuine 8's are nowhere near 10-20% of the overall female population (except, perhaps, if you live in certain parts of Northern or Eastern Europe where they have not yet discovered McDonalds and KFC).
FIFY... Taco bell is winning the fast food wars from what I see.
True. I'm going by all 50 states in general and the entire population.
Okay, what would you give this woman? Her name is Marni and she is some dating coach (has video online etc)
I think 60% sounds reasonable, within a certain age group. I've always thought I've been able to appreciate female beauty, every woman has their own distinct look. Some are beautiful, some are cute, some are sexy. Some might appeal to you on a certain day if your mood is right. But the basic shape, the feminine face, the long hair all tends to be appealing, men are wired to respond to that.
I think the study I mentioned had to do with online dating, they have been able to note the percentage of males that women swipe right on or whatever, and it is a fairly small percentage. But those are just pictures, it's like the study that showed women didn't like the guy who smiled, that was just based on pictures. A man smiling in person might convey some warmth, whereas in the picture he just looks like a people pleasing chimp. Throw people into a social situation, or a 3D form where status and personality come into play, they might react differently.
Not sure if you can believe all the stats you find in videos online.
its so bad in the midlands UK, a woman like this would be snapped up by a guy earning 200k
The cheerleader is an 8, I'd say. Regarding the brunette, it's hard to tell because you can't see her body and the image appears to be touched up. Could be anywhere in the 5-7 range. It's really hard to judge by face alone (which is why catfish photos are always face only). A decent face can be accomplished with makeup, plastic surgery and/or good camera angles. But the main problem with most women these days is their bodies. Beer guts, thick legs, love handles, premature cellulite. Going to the beach in many parts of the U.S. (and increasingly the West in general) is oftentimes scary experience.
Wow, a 5 to 7?
