Texting CREATES relationships

[sylvester the cat]

texting works. Why do you think females like to read romance novels? it's porn to them. If you can play with them using words then you're in.

Men usually fall by their eyes. Women usually fall by their ears, or what they read. How do you think the serpent seduced the first woman Eve? by sweet talking her like the silver tongue devil he is.

i don't recall the serpent persuading Eve to eat the fruit by text messaging her.......pretty hard to do when you've no limbs or digits to text with.

 

[Maximus Rex]

Stop Deflecting, Potna

Personal attacks are what got PHM banned (i'm assuming) and they will get you banned too.

Dude, please explain how dear ole Rex is making disparaging remarks upon your character? If your story is true, I'm happy for you and I hope that things work out for you. However, (as evident by some of the responses on in this thread,) your story lacks congruity.

I was thinking about sarging in SF with you, but now that I realize what an azzhat you really are, I don't want to.

That saddens Rex so.:rolleyes, but anyway, dude you're the one that's gettting emotionally defensive. I'm just questioning how you made this amazing transformation seemingly overnight. Is that such a bad thing?

You should pay attention to the class lecture instead of posting to skinnyguy. You might pass the class that way.

Since you seemed so concerned with how Rex is doing in his Sociology of Institutions class, I'm getting an A, bruh and the final is a take home. Any information I need for that final is in e-mails from what the professor hand out.

Aren't you in your 40's?

Yes. I'm 42, why do you ask?

Who says he has to post pictures of the women he meets?

This particular thread lends itself to a lack of congruity and reeks of mendacity. Besides, it used to be standard practice on this broad to post pictures of yourself in infield, personally I feel it's something that we should go back to. Also, I'm not asking anything of skinnyguy, (or anybody else for that matter,) that I haven't done myself.)

You said yourself you can't get women and have approach anxiety.

Actually, I glad you brought that up. Let's say (for argument's sake,) that I constantly made threads about having approach anxiety and how it leads to my lack of success with women. Then one day, I make thread about how I went to the club, number closed four chicks, kissed closed one, and effed closed another, then I would go on in the same thread to speak about how tight my game is. Isn't fair to say that somebody would would probably find that thread suspect and doubt it's veracity? To sit there and say that a poster wouldn't challenge the truthfulness of that claim doesn't speak much to the honesty and integrity of members of this board and that's all I'm doing.

If skinnyguy has indeed made this vast improvement in his game, don't you think he's doing So Suave a vast disservice by not sharing with us exactly how he implemented these great improvements in his life with the rest of us?

and yes, I have approach anxiety, but that's not to say I get women per se. Actually, I do alright once I'm in set and I have the ball rolling. The thing is that initial approach and something I have to work on is implementing the 3 Second Rule into my life.

I see a bunch of negativity in all your postings.

Which posts bruh?

Stop trying to insult people when your game is just as bad.

Let's that statement at face value and assume that it's a 100% true. Rex would gladly and proudly wave the banner that is his "bad game," because that "bad game," was laid in his own experiences and the truth.

 

[TenOfSpades]

You have a guy in his 20s saying yet it works and you have a guy in his 40s who says it doesn't work.

I myself am in my early 20's as well and I say I have never had a girl lose interest via text. I agree that it can build interest. You also gotta stand out via text because its a saturated market with any number of people texting at the same time. This is all just my experience, which boils down to my argument as to why you both are morons.

Age and life experience boys, age and life experience. A guy my age is going to be mainly dealing with girls who are 18-24 range. These girls have had phones in their hands since they started high school, maybe earlier. It is natural for them. They are used to always texting people. In their eyes it is a normal means of communication. I am not saying it is nearly as strong as in person communication, just that it can be effective on girls that have grown up on cells.

We go to 40's age range now. Most of the girls they are going to be seeing are going to be 30+. These girls did not grow up with phones their whole lives. It is not natural for them. It is an adopted process that came late in their lives. So if a guy is trying to have a conversation with them via text, no duh they are going to wonder WTF is up with this guy. Texting wont work on these girls like the young ones.

I am sure Rex will massively disagree, seems like quite a curmudgeon. I just have to say to you, don't you find it odd that all these people claim it works. Their must be some insight to their claims....

 

[Maximus Rex]

I just have to say to you, don't you find it odd that all these people claim it works.

What I'm seeing is a bunch of dudes with varying degrees of social ineptitude and introverism speaking in extraordinarily platitudes about a very impersonal way of communication that mysteriously not only seems to raises a woman's level, but also gets her aroused. It would be like saying that social proof increases a woman's interest but there's not quite an explanation as to how.

Nobody as of yet has explained to me how opened, numbered closed, then from that moment on proceed to increase an woman's interest level by texting. No theories on what to say, what's an appropriate response time, What's a texting indicator of disinterest? How to combat that texting indicator of disinterest? How to avoid texting miscommunciation? How to deal with that fact that if a chick is texting you, she's more than likely doing something else, and things of that nature.

The only person I've seen on here who has used texting properly is P&V and I think that his success is due to the fact that his initial approach is so on point and he's made such and impression on the chick, that when she sees a text from him, that her mind is immediately flooded with the good feelings and impression that he left her with. That's what I'm saying, I don't it's the texting per se that's increasing her interest. If feel that texting is accentuating and extending what was already an extremely good approach.

Their must be some insight to their claims....

and I'm patiently waiting on somebody to cogently explain those insights to dear ole Rex.

 

[JoeMarron]

What I'm seeing is a bunch of dudes with varying degrees of social ineptitude and introverism speaking in extraordinarily platitudes about a very impersonal way of communication that mysteriously not only seems to raises a woman's level, but also gets her aroused. It would be like saying that social proof increases a woman's interest but there's not quite an explanation as to how.

Nobody as of yet has explained to me how opened, numbered closed, then from that moment on proceed to increase an woman's interest level by texting. No theories on what to say, what's an appropriate response time, What's a texting indicator of disinterest? How to combat that texting indicator of disinterest? How to avoid texting miscommunciation? How to deal with that fact that if a chick is texting you, she's more than likely doing something else, and things of that nature.

The only person I've seen on here who has used texting properly is P&V and I think that his success is due to the fact that his initial approach is so on point and he's made such and impression on the chick, that when she sees a text from him, that her mind is immediately flooded with the good feelings and impression that he left her with. That's what I'm saying, I don't it's the texting per se that's increasing her interest. If feel that texting is accentuating and extending what was already an extremely good approach.



and I'm patiently waiting on somebody to cogently explain those insights to dear ole Rex.

Type in texting into the search bar and you'll find a billion threads on dudes using texting to raise interest. I don't understand how you can use such flowery language and not be able to grasp this concept. Words are immensely powerful and so is female imagination. Lol go watch Catfish. How the hell else are chicks falling for men that they've only exchanged words on a screen with?

 

[asa_don]

What I'm seeing is a bunch of dudes with varying degrees of social ineptitude and introverism speaking in extraordinarily platitudes about a very impersonal way of communication that mysteriously not only seems to raises a woman's level, but also gets her aroused. It would be like saying that social proof increases a woman's interest but there's not quite an explanation as to how.

Nobody as of yet has explained to me how opened, numbered closed, then from that moment on proceed to increase an woman's interest level by texting. No theories on what to say, what's an appropriate response time, What's a texting indicator of disinterest? How to combat that texting indicator of disinterest? How to avoid texting miscommunciation? How to deal with that fact that if a chick is texting you, she's more than likely doing something else, and things of that nature.

The only person I've seen on here who has used texting properly is P&V and I think that his success is due to the fact that his initial approach is so on point and he's made such and impression on the chick, that when she sees a text from him, that her mind is immediately flooded with the good feelings and impression that he left her with. That's what I'm saying, I don't it's the texting per se that's increasing her interest. If feel that texting is accentuating and extending what was already an extremely good approach.



and I'm patiently waiting on somebody to cogently explain those insights to dear ole Rex.

you do know that there are no set rules with texting and getting laid is from interest, right? lol

 

[Maximus Rex]

I Want to Know How This Works

I do think you can turn a "Maybe" into a "Yes" with words alone.

Say you're "conversatin'," with a broad via text, and she's taking maybe five to minutes to return your messages. You ask her why it's taking her so long to return your messages and she says that she's talking to her friend. Do you continue the conversation or do you hit her back to let her know that you'll speak to her when she has more time and you can give your undivided attention?

you do know that there are no set rules with texting and getting laid is from interest, right? lol

But guys are on here saying that you can raise a chicks interest level via texting and I'm interested in the mechanics of this. Also, there has to be certain"do's, and "don'ts," to this, just like there are certain "do's, and "don'ts," to pickup.

 

[:-)]

But guys are on here saying that you can raise a chicks interest level via texting and I'm interested in the mechanics of this. ]

nobody's saying you can raise interest by text. they are saying you can get laid through text. i don't text girls who are not interested in me. i text girls who are. i set up dates, we meet and then we bang.

 

[Greasy Pig]

What I don't get is that skinnyguy says he only listens to Harry Wilmington (among others), but Harry is the first one to propose the "texting kills relationships" idea.
And the title of this thread appears to be a direct and purposeful contradiction of Harry's mantra? WTF?

 

[:-)]

What I don't get is that skinnyguy says he only listens to Harry Wilmington (among others), but Harry is the first one to propose the "texting kills relationships" idea.
And the title of this thread appears to be a direct and purposeful contradiction of Harry's mantra? WTF?

i think it's a given that the OP is an idiot. to say texting creates relationships is about as stupid as stupid is.

 

[Maximus Rex]

nobody's saying you can raise interest by text.

This alone is reason enough for why every man should be texting. There is immense power in arousing a woman through text, then later on her arousing herself over and over again by rereading your text. "The Great Text Debate," http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=212446-Post # 7

"

Texting is a perfect tool....to gauge interest.....screening out flakes.... for escalation... and it saves you time!! , "The Great Text Debate," http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=212446, Post 11

Though the words "arosual," and "escalation," are used instead of "interest, we can all agreed if raised a chick's state of arousal and you have successfully escalated her attraction towards you, then you've also increased her interest. and in this very thread,

I agree that it can build interest. You also gotta stand out via text because its a saturated market with any number of people texting at the same time. Post 23

Type in texting into the search bar and you'll find a billion threads on dudes using texting to raise interest. Post 25

 

[:-)]

"

[/b]

Though the words "arosual," and "escalation," are used instead of "interest, we can all agreed if raised a chick's state of arousal and you have successfully escalated her attraction towards you, then you've also increased her interest. and in this very thread,

ok you win.

 

[adam225]

I just text them no differently to how I text a friend.

Either way, the idea behind all this "texting bs" is to not give off the subconscious cues that show you are desperate and needy. If you are desperate and needy she will smell it sooner or later regardless, and dump your ass. Seriously, these texting threads need to stop. They're suited for PUA forums; not SS. If you were a secure man you wouldn't need to half analysis this kind of stuff... Seriously......

 

[Maximus Rex]

Let's Work Out the Who, What, When, Where, and How's of Texting

Seriously, these texting threads need to stop.

Actually they don't. What we need to find out are the particulars and what strategies are the most effective.

They're suited for PUA forums; not SS.

Dude, So Suave IS A PUA FORUM!

If you were a secure man you wouldn't need to half analysis this kind of stuff... Seriously......

Another one of those, "Oh you're a man, therefore you were to innately have the ability to get any and all the p*ssy you want on demand." Get f*ck out of with that bullsh*t. Oh, there goes Rex with another one of his "negativity posts."

 

[JoeMarron]

Alright...if you want a method here's a method. Back in my PUA product consuming days I read both of these and they're legit. Basically be playful, fun and teasing (like how we should be talking to women all the time), keep it short and only use it to set up dates, be vivid and descriptive when it comes to sexting. Pretty much all of this has been said in the DJ Bible so I don't know why this is such a controversial subject.

http://www.thesocialman.com/products/how2txther/

http://magneticmessagingbobby.com/

http://www.girlschase.com/content/text-message-flirting

http://www.girlschase.com/content/what-text-girls-get-dates

http://www.girlschase.com/content/how-text-girl

 

[sylvester the cat]

magnetic messaging is stoopid

 

[adam225]

Actually they don't. What we need to find out are the particulars and what strategies are the most effective.



Dude, So Suave IS A PUA FORUM!



Another one of those, "Oh you're a man, therefore you were to innately have the ability to get any and all the p*ssy you want on demand." Get f*ck out of with that bullsh*t. Oh, there goes Rex with another one of his "negativity posts."

Wow, I honestly can't believe I've just read that. I look at this forum as guidance on how to become an independent man that is completely self aware about the reality of women. To me it's not about scoring countless women, it's more about being happy and living life on my terms. Each to their own though, if you want to spend your entire life chasing after women and analysing "how to get them" then do so. It's a completely delusional life to live in my opinion. It's no different from a druggie working ouť how he'll get his "next hiť"...

 

[apprenticedj]

You guys are too damn much!

Whatever happened to the saying "to each his own"? "Different strokes for different folks"? etc

If a chick has low interest you don't stand much of a chance of raising it via ANY METHOD whether that be texting, calling or waiting outside her house at 3 AM. She doesn't really dig you, end of story.

If a chick has high interest I think, depending on your "text game", you can do yourself a disservice if you're texting too much, responding right away, seeming needy. But if you use restraint and keep working the mysterious angle you should be just fine.

Texting is not an option these days especially if, as others have said, you're gaming a girl in her 20's. They text, that's what they do. The key is to stand out from the potentially dozens of orbiters she's playing pen pals with all day. This is where restraint/not responding really gets her hamster working. She'll be thinking:

Why hasn't he responded?! All guys text me right back?!?!? WTF?!?!?

If you're not a texter no biggie. If you like to text then by all means do your thing. I have no clue why everyone wants to bicker about this as if there is a concrete rule somewhere. Texting is a tool, nothing more, nothing less.