Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature

Joined
Mar 18, 2006
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
36
70 virgins???? Most of you guys will destroy the inhabitants of the earth for the possession of only one Hor!!!
 

Bonhomme

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
16
Location
Land of the Ruins
Abuse, intimidation, and degradation are all part of men's repertoire of tactics employed in competitive situations. In other words, men are not treating women differently from men—the definition of discrimination, under which sexual harassment legally falls—but the opposite: Men harass women precisely because they are not discriminating between men and women.
Very interesting... but this only applies if they do so with the intent to harass. This would not apply to the chump who's trying to pester a woman into dating him.
 

Obsidian

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
26
Location
TN
If we were designed to be polygamous, then why are we born with a (basically) half chance of being male and half chance of being female? There's supposed to be a match for everyone that wants one! It's only the hormongers that seek to violate this natural order. They often think they are making themselves better off by racking up a long line of hors. These males are only deluding themselves, and they will never be happy.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2006
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
36
Obsidian said:
If we were designed to be polygamous, then why are we born with a (basically) half chance of being male and half chance of being female? There's supposed to be a match for everyone that wants one!
Good point! :up:
 

piranha45

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
973
Reaction score
38
the article is awesome.


70 virgins???? Most of you guys will destroy the inhabitants of the earth for the possession of only one Hor!!!
:D
 

TheHumanist

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
381
Reaction score
12
Going by the article, it sould like we not natually polygamous in a way, "mildly polygamous" could easily mean heavyly leaning to monogamy.
 

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
77
If Islam promises 72 virgins upon death, I'm converting tomorrow.
 

azanon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,292
Reaction score
41
Obsidian said:
If we were designed to be polygamous, then why are we born with a (basically) half chance of being male and half chance of being female?
The article answered that. Did you not understand it and need it rephrased?

There's supposed to be a match for everyone that wants one!
Really? Says who?

It's only the hormongers that seek to violate this natural order. They often think they are making themselves better off by racking up a long line of hors. These males are only deluding themselves, and they will never be happy.
Its terribly ironic that the most anti-Darwinian proponents here claim to be arguing on the side of natural order.

You can't get any less "natural order" than to inject any kind of morality into your arguments. Nature doesn't give a damn about morality.
 

Mad Manic

Banned
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
1,056
Reaction score
7
Location
Leeds, UK
"Most women benefit from polygyamy, while most men benefit from monogamy"
Correct.

1.) Women have higher social value than men. The average woman has more friends, more people of the opposite sex gunning for her and a lot of consequent advantages from that. Men have higher depression and suicide rates DESPITE being less emotionally inclined.

2.) Women are more sought after than men. The value of a vagina is more than a penis. Women can have sex freely and easily, it's an uphill struggle for most guys. Therefore polygamy suits women, monagamy suits men, since most men are happy with one girl as often they have 0.

3.) Since men have lesser social and sexual value than women, scientists have suggested that in theory men could become near extinct if we extrapolated time forward a hell of a lot. A small number of men could be shagging and making babies with loads of women since they are the ones with high enough value to get with these women and are happy to do so (due to points 1 and 2).

4.) The median 22 year old woman has over twice as much sex as the median 22 year old man. Take into account how men chase all the time for sex and women fend a lot of men off from wanting sex with them! This becomes even more distorted for the hotter girls, god knows, 4/5 times as much as a guess compared with the comparative hot guys. The average hot girl has waaaay more value than a hot guy. Her phone is always buzzing, girls and guys want to be with her.

That's our society for you, feminist as hell and men have become of lesser worth. Women can also support themselves now in the workplace on similar levels to men, hell an attractive girl is guaranteed a well paid job if she has her wits about her. Do they really need guys? See point 3 ...

MM
 

Bonhomme

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
3,958
Reaction score
16
Location
Land of the Ruins
f Islam promises 72 virgins upon death, I'm converting tomorrow.
Anyone can promise anything. What do they deliver?
 

Obsidian

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
26
Location
TN
hah, women have higher social value? in what sense?

Lots more men than women want to have casual sex. So what? Lots more women desire your typical chump for his ability to listen to their problems, pay for dinner, talk to her, etc.

They're both just getting used. That's not value.
 

eddy fox

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Mad Manic said:
"Most women benefit from polygyamy, while most men benefit from monogamy"
Correct.

1.) Women have higher social value than men. The average woman has more friends, more people of the opposite sex gunning for her and a lot of consequent advantages from that. Men have higher depression and suicide rates DESPITE being less emotionally inclined.

2.) Women are more sought after than men. The value of a vagina is more than a penis. Women can have sex freely and easily, it's an uphill struggle for most guys. Therefore polygamy suits women, monagamy suits men, since most men are happy with one girl as often they have 0.

3.) Since men have lesser social and sexual value than women, scientists have suggested that in theory men could become near extinct if we extrapolated time forward a hell of a lot. A small number of men could be shagging and making babies with loads of women since they are the ones with high enough value to get with these women and are happy to do so (due to points 1 and 2).

4.) The median 22 year old woman has over twice as much sex as the median 22 year old man. Take into account how men chase all the time for sex and women fend a lot of men off from wanting sex with them! This becomes even more distorted for the hotter girls, god knows, 4/5 times as much as a guess compared with the comparative hot guys. The average hot girl has waaaay more value than a hot guy. Her phone is always buzzing, girls and guys want to be with her.

That's our society for you, feminist as hell and men have become of lesser worth. Women can also support themselves now in the workplace on similar levels to men, hell an attractive girl is guaranteed a well paid job if she has her wits about her. Do they really need guys? See point 3 ...

MM
we shud abort off male babies at birth until it gets more fair, also lower crime rtaes since most of it is by men.
 
Top