South Carolina officer charged with murder after shooting man in the back

[Stagger Lee]

And? An overzealous law enforcement is the natural progression of a big gov, low trust and atomized (dieverse) society. Getting all (pretend) pissy over it makes as much sense as moving to the Sahara and whining that it's hot.

It's not a bug, it's a feature.

An overzealous law enforcement is only a problem to liberals since a few of their favorite pet group was on the receiving end.

It's obvious to me liberals want crime to increase with their open borders immigration and coddling criminals, but they don't want the police to crack down on their more violent crime prone "people of color" pets. The overzealous law enforcement is intended for imaginary Nazis and false rape claims.

 

[FairShake]

And? An overzealous law enforcement is the natural progression of a big gov, low trust and atomized (dieverse) society. Getting all (pretend) pissy over it makes as much sense as moving to the Sahara and whining that it's hot.

Actually getting all angry over governmental violence is what any man worth his weight would do. Defending it or shrugging your shoulders and saying "Like...wow" is what women or millenials would do.

Just like your claim that police shootings are in a two decade high is meaningless or at best a half-truth, no way are you going to sell that certain groups haven't been carrying on their violent behavior more lately. They've been rioting and antagonizing the police encouraged by Obama and liberals.

Strange it wasn't a half-truth when it was claimed that police shootings are "vanishingly rare."

If police shootings are up and only a fraction of police departments actually report shootings won't any thinking person rightly assume that the hundreds of police departments that don't report shootings are, you know, not reporting shootings that ADD to the total? Meaning the number of shootings are even less "vanishingly rare" that originally thought.

I actually appreciate you strengthening my point!

 

[( . )( . )]

Actually getting all angry over governmental violence is what any man worth his weight would do. Defending it or shrugging your shoulders and saying "Like...wow" is what women or millenials would do.

You don't though, you're not a "man" worth his weight. You only get (pretend) angry if it's an overzealous cop vs a dindu. Everything else is crickets. Kind of like an e-preening "wow..just wow" millennial.

You can't whine about America being "too white" on one hand then complain about an atomized low trust society on the other.That feigned concern is the realm of the sh1tlib and with the advent of internet all too transparent these days. In other words you're being as genuine as a 3 dollar bill.

 

[Tictac]

Milkshake thinks that the reporting of shootings by police and shootings by police are the same thing.

She has no data and wouldn't know what to do with it if she did.

Are police shootings on the increase Milkshake? Or is increased reporting of the same or lesser number of police shootings confusing your pea brain?

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Only a fraction of law enforcement agencies provide this data to the FBI, and the agencies reporting changes every year. These problems are not new and were in fact noted in the USA Today story he referenced.

And lets not forget that the FBI themselves aren't the best bunch of civil servants either...

"The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000."
​

FBI Admits Flaws in Analysis Over Decades
​

Yeah, we need more Government intervention to police the people...

 

[Stagger Lee]

Strange it wasn't a half-truth when it was claimed that police shootings are "vanishingly rare."

If police shootings are up and only a fraction of police departments actually report shootings won't any thinking person rightly assume that the hundreds of police departments that don't report shootings are, you know, not reporting shootings that ADD to the total? Meaning the number of shootings are even less "vanishingly rare" that originally thought.

I actually appreciate you strengthening my point!

Nice try, but police shootings are vanishingly rare compared to a certain group of civilians shooting each other and others. The point is we don't know whether or not the only reason police shootings reports are up is because there is less underreporting currently. The data is incomplete an inconsistently reported and hence unreliable. And we now have proof we can't even trust the FBI completely. I don't blindly trust anything reported under the Obama or a liberal administration.