Jules Verne
Don Juan
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2008
- Messages
- 89
- Reaction score
- 3
I wanted to check out other blogs that were relative to SoSuave and Roissy in terms of the game.
I started with commentators on Roissy's blog. Surely, they must have nice insight on the same topic?
Most blogs run by those posters were rational (regardless of their relevance to the game), but a few posters like Whiskey had blogrolls that advocate far-right propaganda.
For example, Whiskey lists blogs like OneSTDV and Half Sigma. Both seem to either imply or channel white nationalist/right wing extremism discreetly behind supposedly political and/or scientific posts. You can occasionally find references to Steve Sailer, who turns out to be a ****ing moron and a racial bigot and disguising racism as human biodiversity and other twisted scientific terms.
How is this related to Roissy?
After discovering these connections, I'm curious about just what kind of people read Roissy's blog as well as other ones similar to his content. It got me thinking about how these crazy ****ers, in my opinions, seem to misinterpret Roissy's occasionally misanthropic and sexist posts (usually controversial ones about race) as justifiable evidence for their agenda.
This is just all my assumption based on observing the posters. It is probably exaggerated, but I was just so baffled at the thought of some people reading Roissy being so prejudiced and misusing Roissy's intended message.
I just wanted to hear everyone's thoughts on the information above.
I started with commentators on Roissy's blog. Surely, they must have nice insight on the same topic?
Most blogs run by those posters were rational (regardless of their relevance to the game), but a few posters like Whiskey had blogrolls that advocate far-right propaganda.
For example, Whiskey lists blogs like OneSTDV and Half Sigma. Both seem to either imply or channel white nationalist/right wing extremism discreetly behind supposedly political and/or scientific posts. You can occasionally find references to Steve Sailer, who turns out to be a ****ing moron and a racial bigot and disguising racism as human biodiversity and other twisted scientific terms.
How is this related to Roissy?
After discovering these connections, I'm curious about just what kind of people read Roissy's blog as well as other ones similar to his content. It got me thinking about how these crazy ****ers, in my opinions, seem to misinterpret Roissy's occasionally misanthropic and sexist posts (usually controversial ones about race) as justifiable evidence for their agenda.
This is just all my assumption based on observing the posters. It is probably exaggerated, but I was just so baffled at the thought of some people reading Roissy being so prejudiced and misusing Roissy's intended message.
I just wanted to hear everyone's thoughts on the information above.