Maximus Rex said:
Originally Posted by Jaylan
A woman slaps you...self defense is restraining her if she tries it again. Its not necessary to strike her.
Yes it because she's trying to cause me seriously harm. If a women are equal, and they're equal enough hit a man, then they're equal enough to get their f*cking jaw broken.
A slap is trying to cause you serious harm, really? Thing is, because men are so much stronger, and because women are structured differently, if you do hit her back you stand a good chance of breaking her jaw. Then you may end up on the hook for her medical bills, which aren't cheap these days.
Fatal Jay said:
no real man is going to let a woman slap him and walk off
So a "real man" is going to KNOCK THE BISH OUT? The way I see it, the classic alpha response of a man getting slapped IS to let her walk off. It's nothing to him, it's not like he's really hurt, or he's been put in a situation where he has to prove his manhood.
Seems like letting her walk off is a more alpha response than turning into the guy from the HOW CAN YOU SLAP? video. Seems like that guy would be seen as the much bigger pvssy.
Of course, it's not right that the woman gets off scott free. There should probably be charges pressed against her for assault. However, the problem with that is I doubt that most men would get that worked up over it, because as I've said, they don't see the woman as a credible threat.
I'm sure we've all had girls playfully punch us in the arm, as a form of flirting. They do this partly because we are big strong men in their eyes, and they know they can't hurt us. If a girl playfully punches you in the arm, is the consensus SoSuave response to turn around and knock all her teeth down her throat?
Fatal Jay said:
If a woman so much as spit on you, you have the right to self defense you dumb f*ck boy.
Unfortunately, Stephen A. Smith got suspended for saying far less than that.
Danger said:
Additionally, I wonder. Jaylan or Zekko, if you knew the law would not punish you, would you return slap for slap? Punch for punch?
No. I wouldn't feel the need. Unless there was a credible threat, but if it's a woman, that seems very unlikely. I just don't see unarmed females as credible threats. Unless maybe if they weigh 300 lbs.
Danger said:
I am thinking there are several categories of men here in how they would place themselves, even if the law allowed for them to retaliate...which would you place yourself in? And why?
•Men who would return the assault at a higher level, to keep her from thinking of doing it again (The ol', you send one of my men to the hospital and I'll send two of yours to the morgue).
•Men who would return at assault with another assault (punch for punch).
•Men who would restrain her.
•Men who would remove themselves from the situation altogether.
Put me in the last two. I've posted enough in this thread that you should be able to figure out why. I might add in avoiding putting myself in situations where this would be necessary - i.e., don't date crazy b!tches.
Danger said:
Zekko hasn't weighed in yet, but I am curious. Would you also restrain yourself if it was a man who was weaker or smaller? What I am trying to establish is if your value system is based upon gender, or size.
Good question. Thing is, men and women are built differently. So even a smaller man can be a physical threat. A lot of smaller guys are really quick with their punches. We've all seen smaller guys knock out much bigger guys.
However, I suppose if the guy was significantly smaller or weaker, I would make an effort not to hurt him. In fact, I've been in a situations where I've had to restrain a drunk, hold him down until he chilled out. In some ways, that's probably more humiliating than getting punched out.