jophil28
Master Don Juan
Word !guru1000 said:Going forward, if you plan to surround yourself with the highest quality candidates, disqualify her for disrespect not self respect.
Word !guru1000 said:Going forward, if you plan to surround yourself with the highest quality candidates, disqualify her for disrespect not self respect.
That wasn't your best -in fact it was kinda tragic.imgamens said:Obviously I wasn’t making her wet enough, And that hurt me on a very personal level!
That was the night to have sex- I did it all- all kinds of romantic scenarios, but I was still C/F and negging- and qualifying- but it just wasn’t enough.
And when your best isn’t good enough- that hurts.
Your bud is just as inexperienced and trigger happy as you are.imgamens said:1st: my bud has been hanging out with a 35 year old woman as well. He actually got her naked, but no sex. She has touched his **** and he has fingered her as well. They went out on all sorts of interesting dates, and they went out 6 times. The last time she told him:
“I don’t want to have sex outside of a relationship”
He then broke it off with her right then and there.
That is crazy logic. You cannot impose your expectations of sexual rewards on a woman according to the number of hours that you have 'logged' with her on dates.imgamens said:True- this was a day three- but it was a 12 hour day three- we visited 5 different venues and enjoyed a nice variety of romantic date activities- those 12 hours could have easily taken place over the course of 2 to 4 separate dates. So I consider this 12 hour date worth at least two real dates.
.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
And yet here he is, d!ck-in-hand. What's more ironic is that any guy here would think that by her filibustering this guy after teasing him to this degree she'd be a potentially "quality woman". I feel like I'm taking crazy pills! Aren't YOU guys supposed to be the ones to tell chumps they need to vet women more stringently? WTF?!guru said:So you read a few of Rollo's rules and disqualify a girl who didn't give up the goods by date three. Yet if this girl banged your brains out on date 1, she would be a worthwhile investment?
Do you honestly believe EVERY girl who is into you will f*ck you by date three?
If the girl is escalating and continues to date you, she finds you attractive. What you have done is taken an admirable quality, which is self control, and punished her for it. Continue with this mentality and you will build yourself a harem full of hoars, not quality contenders.
Man, all you guys have your knickers in a twist.imgamens said:So she continued to jerk me off, I stopped her before I came- I didn’t want to *** in her hand.
It doesn't matter how good-looking you are, how romantic you are, how funny you are... or anything else. If she doesn't have something INVESTED in you and the relationship, preferably quite a LOT invested, she'll dump you, without even the slightest hesitation, as soon as someone a little more "interesting" comes along.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
imgamens said:Mystery is an earner, not a guru to base your interactions on. Tactics are a temporary bandaid and do not create genuine desire.Then we are talking date 4 or 5 with no sex!
You guys believe in Mystery method? Well then I don’t see how someone could go that long without at least seeing the girl naked. And there comes a point where you realize no sex means she was never going to give it up in the first place. And that’s why there is a date three rule to begin with!
ASD is temporary whether a day, week or month. At 37, her biological clock is ticking; she thinks differently than a 21 year old. Other factors you look at are her past relationships, family upbringing and religious background. Every woman is not made the same, so don't let a fallible RULE impact your behavior.
A more important question; why is a man in his early thirties (early prime) wasting him precious time on a 37 year old?
All this is is indicative of an AFC scarcity mindset. Be absolute, have a zero bullsh!t tolerance,...but not so much that you might lose out on what seems to be a good "quality woman" (or even potentially so if it fits an outline). Why don't we just say ONEitis is a good thing while we're at it? Sorry absolutists, you don't get to play both ways, that's one of the drawbacks of living in a black or white world. I can tell this guy to pragmatically eject and you're going to say "no, it's your fault, give her more time, sublimate yourself in spite of her behavioral manipulations"?Now who is really being absolute?"If a girl does not spread her legs by date three, disqualify her"
You do not diffuse a variable equation with absolute rules when women are the variable denominator. If women were a constant, absolutes would strengthen your position. In this case, women are not constant.
However, one should be absolute in application of his own rules and follow through with application as not to betray him self. Unfortunately NEXTing by date three is not a pragmatic rule. In the case where a woman disrespects him, then he can NEXT her. But in the scenario where she escalates, disqualifying her is premature and unwarranted.
Men frequently err by talking too much. They often monopolize conversations, droning on and on about topics that bore women to tears. They think they're impressing the women when, in reality, they're depressing the women.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
guru1000 said:Do you honestly believe EVERY girl who is into you will f*ck you by date three?
WTF? This is the sort of thing I hear from the chump school.squirrels said:Sex is an intimate thing for women, and even though her body wants it, she may need a little more time to think.
Zunder said:WTF? This is the sort of thing I hear from the chump school.
A women that is into you will want to bang, and bang, and bang.
There is nothing fvckin intimate about women and sex. You really believe that bullsh"t?
Intimate for a woman is remembering her birthday, anniversary with a candle-lit dinner...you know, that sort of cr@p.
I will never forget what one gf told me years ago...it was early in our relationship, I still had a few AFC traits. So I am on the couch, feeling her up slowly, blah blah blah....... finally she just said, "Just bend me over the couch and fuvk my brains out".
(For those of you not from Downunder, a couch is a lounge suite or sofa.)
Which is it?guru1000 said:What you have done is taken an admirable quality, which is self control, and punished her for it. Continue with this mentality and you will build yourself a harem full of hoars, not quality contenders.
You must not have read the parts of the post about "bonding", "romance", "cuddling", and "jammies".You clearly misunderstood her intentions. She applied her ASD and still escalated as a result of high IL in you, not low.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.