Slutwalk

[Desdinova]

This past weekend, a whole bunch of women got together to send a message that the way they dressed does not give a man consent to have sex with them. This was a direct reaction to a court judge who blamed a woman's skimpy clothes in defense of the rapist.

In my opinion, this kind of activism does not solve the problem. All it does is justify how damned stupid women can be.

Here's the link. Look at the pictures and enjoy reading the comment section:

http://www.winnipegsun.com/2011/10/15/slutwalk-aims-to-end-victim-blaming

 

[LiveFreeX]

'consent: get some'

You know none of those women are getting any.

“The main message is just that it’s not their fault,” she said

So typically Canadian... 'we are not at fault for anything we do, girl power! boys are stupid!".

I have a friend attending Waterloo in Kitchener and he says there are so many 'activists' walking around the campus with retarded buttons like: "Straight but not narrow!" "Assault is a man's problem" and retarded crap... so many young women wasting their lives focusing on non-issues.

Also, where the fvck are all these alleged 'rapes' taking place?!? And who the fvck would want to 'rape' any of these broads... you'd have to be right out of your mind.

 

[Deadly_Ripped]

Well I think most guys in this forum would agree that dressing slutty isn't itself a form of consent to have sexual contact with another human being.

This means, just because a woman is dressed slutty, it doesn't mean she cannot press rape charges if a guy forces himself on her and she insist that he stop.

The protest is in response to a comment by a judge that dressing like a slut diminishes a woman's right to not be raped, because her appearance is a non-verbal sign of open consent.

I think everyone here would agree that the above statement is ABSURD. The protest is in response to that comment, and I'm all for this protest. Could you imagine if a judge said that any man who wears a muscle shirt and tight jeans is openly consenting to having his abs and biceps and ass touched by women, regardless of their level of attractiveness etc? That is absolutely ridiculous!

I'm all for gender roles, but I'm also all for equal rights to privacy and protection in the eyes of the law.

Plus, how bad can this protest be? I was talking with someone yesterday at one of the occupy protests about it, and she said that there are many good looking women there dressed in very skimpy outfits protesting. Let them celebrate their sexuality and their right to be attractive and wear revealing clothing with consenting to sexual contact!

 

[Strelok]

Most of this problems regarding rape happens not because a girl dress like a slvts and then get raped for that but most likely because she dress as a slvt, get attention from cavemen looking for sex and she let them think she is on for it because she likes the attention.

Once she got the attention she wanted or the caveman is getting too pushy she out of nowhere tell him to get lost, the caveman get pissed off for being taken advantage of, so rape happens because of sex drive and desire to get even.

So no, a raper should not be protected because the girl he raped was dressed as a slvt however at the same time we should remind those cvnts that just because they have a pvssy doesnt mean they have the right to push it beyond the limit with no conseguences.

This one last line answer most to most of the question regarding gender problems.

 

[Sir Psycho Sexy]

I SHOULD BE ABLE TO WALK DOWN THE STREET AT NIGHT WHILE HOLDING A ROLL OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLAR BILLS WITHOUT FEAR OF GETTING MUGGED!!!

Shame on the mugger! I did nothing to provoke him!

 

[Deadly_Ripped]

Sir psycho are you really suggesting that it's more acceptable to be mugged if it's obvious you have money than if it's not? How is it any less of a violation of your personal space or property?

 

[Sir Psycho Sexy]

Sir psycho are you really suggesting that it's more acceptable to be mugged if it's obvious you have money than if it's not? How is it any less of a violation of your personal space or property?

More acceptable??!? No of course not. You know exactly what Im saying and it upsets you how much (common) sense it makes.

Walking down the street while holding money will be more inviting to criminals.

Here let me give you another example---I live in a bad neighborhood so I ALWAYS make sure I dont keep anything valuable in my car. If I do happen to have something valuable in my car then I cover it up, either under the seat or in the trunk.

A women who is exposed will be more inviting to a criminal, just like the exposed money in hand or the exposed valuables in the car.

I dont make the rules, im just telling you how it is.

These SLUTwalks are a huge waste of time....your not going to change the way a rapist thinks just because you call him sexist......

 

[ArcBound]

I agree that technically yes it should not be the fault of women who are raped, and the men who rape should be castrated or put into jail.

But sometimes the women are just putting themselves into situations where they are more likely to get raped, which is saying something different than blaming the girl for the rape (which a lot of the people doing slutwalk don't seem to understand).

For example, if I get mugged or shot, then yes the perpetrator is 100% to blame. But if I take a stroll through Harlem at 3am as a white guy then I am putting myself into a situation where I am more likely to be mugged or shot. Likewise the girls are simply putting themselves into a situation where they are more likely to be raped the more revealing clothing they wear. It has nothing to do with sexism or men blaming women for being raped, it just has to do with how the world works.

If women want to champion the cause of not being blamed for rape, they have to find another way to do it, the slutwalk is not sending the right message and in fact is probably making people lose more respect for them.
Edit: Ahh Sir Pyscho Sexy already said what I wanted to say

 

[romangod]

The Slutwalk is typical of the modern, feminist mindset. They're proud to be sluts and don't think of the term as pejorative.

They should be able to flaunt their bodies for attention but a man must not look at them as a sexual object. Unless, of course, they want you to.

It is up to the man to decipher their motive even though they themselves aren't conscious of them.


Just another example of men being told of how they should think and react to women that don't think and just react.


Another mine is planted in the minefield for men to stick handle through and suppress their basic instincts.


Cheers!

 

[spider_007]

ha....one of the pictures on that link one b!tch has a sign "our cloths are not our consent", and next to her is a half naked girl.....CHICKS ARE FUNNY.

She is right...cloths aren't consent....but they also aren't a deterrent from us treating her like a whooores

 

[Julius_Seizeher]

They were bernankified in college via secretive tapings of neocon butthex without the womenz consent lolzozlzolzozlozozlzo

 

[Mike32ct]

It's just attention wh@ring, no more, no less.

 

[DanelMadr]

I'm not sure the judge dropped the case bc of it. He just made a remark. And I believe it was acrually a Canadian cop. But I'm not 100% certain.

Nevertheless rape is rape no matter if she was slutty or even naked.

But a word of caution from real world: 'When you dress slutty you are taking a risk.' The same way, when you walk alone through park or hitchhike.

It does not make the attacker innocent at all but you kinda created favourable circumstances. Like not looking around on when you cross a road.

 

[Desdinova]

I agree 100% with not placing blame on the victim, but dressing like a piece of trash is no way to raise awareness of the issue. It's not just women dressing sexy, it happens in many other cases such as child and spousal abuse. Would it be a good idea to march your kids around in their underwear to combat this problem?

 

[ArcBound]

I agree 100% with not placing blame on the victim, but dressing like a piece of trash is no way to raise awareness of the issue. It's not just women dressing sexy, it happens in many other cases such as child and spousal abuse. Would it be a good idea to march your kids around in their underwear to combat this problem?

Exactly this. And it hurts actual rape victims more, when attention seeking girls just want to prance around naked in a parade. There are ways of presenting your view and this is literally one of the worst ways possibly.