She has no Soul

[Spaz]

"all's fair in love and war" is because love is like war. Just because a woman(or man) acts ruthlessly in that context doesn't necessarily mean they are a bad person or "soulless". It's just the nature of the beast.

A good analogy LA.

But before one enters that war, its best to be armed no?

 

[ElCheapo]

One first has to be drafted by the other party to enter the "war" that is "love". If anyone sees love as going to war they simply are weak and care too much about "losing" some "battle" with the opposite sex.

It's best for the weak and confused to sit on the sidelines playing armchair general.

 

[Spaz]

One first has to be drafted by the other party to enter the "war" that is "love". If anyone sees love as going to war they simply are weak and care too much about "losing" some "battle" with the opposite sex.

It's best for the weak and confused to sit on the sidelines playing armchair general.

You have a point and for some men, that's their reality.

Shouldn't they be properly 'armed'?

 

[bacchus]

Moderate right-wing and despise extremism. But we can agree to disagree.

I think those that are pushing the so-called ""merits"" of this very silly thread should explain the 10 merits of this thread in bullet points.

I'll even give you a 10% discount. Name 9.

Rando,

Can you name ONE thread in which you’ve provided constructive advice to a SoSuave member? It seems all you do on here is criticize others. You’re basically a full time whiny little bltch. It’s becoming tiresome.

Just one thread, and copy and paste it here. I’ll wait.

 

[bacchus]

Merely an exact mirror of the value mooch on page 1 aimed at the collective.

So what you are saying is that this way of conducting oneself is unnacceptable?

Is there anyone on SoSuave that understands what the heck this man is saying? You string a lot of big words together incoherently.

 

[Spaz]

Rando, Baccus, that's enough. Keep to the topic, there's enough bantering here to sidetrack the whole thread.

If there's a point either for or against then state it with some good content.