Seriously? Two thugs shoot a baby in the head.....

[speed dawg]

http://gma.yahoo.com/two-teenage-bo...ing-death-205206658--abc-news-topstories.html

Why isn't this all over Fox News and CNN? When blacks kill whites it doesn't count? This is fvcking sick. I would enjoy watching those two punks die slowly. And that's what should happen, to send a message to the rest of their thug brethren. White people need to get their heads out of their asses and realize that they are the prey.

 

[Vidrio]

This has nothing to do with race. Two thugs tried to rob someone and shot her when she had no money. This happens to black people on a daily basis too. Everyone is prey to these guys.

 

[betheman]

This has nothing to do with race. Two thugs tried to rob someone and shot her when she had no money. This happens to black people on a daily basis too. Everyone is prey to these guys.

white people do this to blacks?

 

[Vidrio]

white people do this to blacks?

That has nothing to do with what I'm trying to say, and is irrelevant. It's not about race. It's about thugs and non-thugs. Thugs do it to people of any race. I grew up around these types of people and they would target anyone, no matter the race. I'm just trying to say that they're not specifically only targetting white people like the OP is trying to make it seem. Any upstanding citizen is a target, not just white people.

 

[goundra]

hah.

I have literally and repeatedly heard blacks say that it is 'impossible" for blacks to be racist! thats how ignorant and arrogant it is possible (for any so called "race" ) to be. They can't even define race, you know. at what point does a person become not of a given race? 25% bloodline? 12%? Some of the Native American "tribes' recognize 1/32 bloodline. ;-) what a crock.

 

[Jaylan]

http://gma.yahoo.com/two-teenage-bo...ing-death-205206658--abc-news-topstories.html

Why isn't this all over Fox News and CNN? When blacks kill whites it doesn't count? This is fvcking sick. I would enjoy watching those two punks die slowly. And that's what should happen, to send a message to the rest of their thug brethren. White people need to get their heads out of their asses and realize that they are the prey.

1. the baby was Hispanic

2. Why do white people make killings like this about race, but say nothing about race when Adam Lanza kills 20 young kids?

3. If you want to talk about race, why dont you do it also when white dudes go crazy and shoot people up?

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

http://gma.yahoo.com/two-teenage-bo...ing-death-205206658--abc-news-topstories.html

Why isn't this all over Fox News and CNN? When blacks kill whites it doesn't count? This is fvcking sick. I would enjoy watching those two punks die slowly. And that's what should happen, to send a message to the rest of their thug brethren. White people need to get their heads out of their asses and realize that they are the prey.

For one thing, most blacks kill other blacks. Meaning that most murders perpetrated by blacks are against other blacks.

For another thing, black on black murders happen several times, every single day.

The ONLY reason for the MSM to run with this PARTICULAR story would ONLY be due to the black on white angle.

In which case, all the black victims of black crime could EASILY and JUSTIFIABLY ask:

"Why is it only white victims are reported in the news?"

And speaking of that school shooting, where everybody was white, one could also justifiably ask:

Why so much media attention on 20 killed white people, when black people murder each other by the dozens EVERY SINGLE DAY?

 

[Who Dares Win]

1. the baby was Hispanic

2. Why do white people make killings like this about race, but say nothing about race when Adam Lanza kills 20 young kids?

3. If you want to talk about race, why dont you do it also when white dudes go crazy and shoot people up?

1)If the baby shot is the one in the picture, hispanic my hairy ass its white as milk doesnt matter if from norway or mexico.

2)Spree killers kills whoever they find around most of the times, its no about race or money, they are just sick cells running around like a cancer

3)Whenever a white dude harm some non white herds of liberals (white mostly) start crying racism even if the beating happened while contending a woman.

What users here are trying to say (I guess) its that black on white racism gets a free pass while white on black whatever gets plenty of attention wheter is racism or not.

Not something Im sure to understand honestly, in Europe we dont have such ethnic problems like in the states except sweden,england and those other countries "blessed" with muslisms enrichment.

Not that I have any problem with muslims, given the choice I would kick out white leftists and feminists as a priority, that would fix most of political problems.

 

[speed dawg]

It is widely known that in black welfare ridden communities it is taught that the white people are holding down the blacks and beating/disrespecting/killing a white person is a badge of honor. Idiots.

But I guess I can't ask these questions without being labeled a Nazi white supremist racist redneck? Fvck that noise, libs can get over it. I'm not the problem....I'm ahead of the curve. I've never mistreated anyone of any other race, so fvck anyone's opinion of me. The fact is, blacks commit crimes against whites at a much higher clip than vice versa, and that's all over the world, since the beginning of time. Whites get labeled as the enemy for one single period of time in U.S. History. What a bunch of bull. Sick of this entitled nonsense.

I truly want to move out of the South simply because I don't want to go up to a gas station and get shot in the head by some black thug for $5. The chances of that happening in the Pacific Northwest are much smaller. Know why that is? Demographics of race.

And again (I can't believe I really have to say this), but I am JUST ASKING THE QUESTIONS. I do not hate black people in general. But the numbers don't lie.

 

[Vidrio]

It is widely known that in black welfare ridden communities it is taught that the white people are holding down the blacks and beating/disrespecting/killing a white person is a badge of honor. Idiots.

I'm not saying you're a racist, I just think you're turning something that has nothing to do with race into a race debate. What I just quoted is pretty much BS. Black criminals are more likely to kill a black person than a white person because they rarely leave there neighborhoods, which are filled with other blacks, and its widely believed in "black welfare ridden communities" that killing a white person is more dangerous, because the police will try to find the killer more than they would for killing a black person. If you don't live in a poverty stricken community you have as much to worry about in terms of getting killed by a black person, as getting killed by any other race. Middle-upper class blacks don't commit the same amount of violent crimes as lower class blacks, just like middle-upper class whites commit less violent crimes than lower class whites. Areas with higher poverty rates have higher violence. Blacks have higher poverty rates, therefore they have higher violence rates.

 

[speed dawg]

Areas with higher poverty rates have higher violence. Blacks have higher poverty rates, therefore they have higher violence rates.

Average all the numbers out, and blacks are significantly more likely to commit violent crime, especially with random victims.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

I'm pretty sure Obama's unknown son Trayvon would disagree with that statement.

It's a forgone conclusion that black on white crime is basically ignored, while any white on black crime tears through the media at light speed. Even if they have to spin it as a "white hispanic".

Fair point. I'll simplify it.

Stories about "dog bites man" don't get reported. Not news

Stories about "man bites dog" do get reported. News.

Blacks kill blacks. (dog bites man). not news

Whites kill blacks (man bites dog) Big News! Big Anger! Big righteousness!

Blacks kill whites (man bites dog) Big News BUT will stir up too much controversy, so doesn't get reported.


(Just look at that guy's story about "Being white in Philadelphia" did for his career.)

HOWEVER, and this is a pretty interesting take on things. It's how some media outlets are reporting crimes like the one originally mentioned, WITHOUT MENTIONING RACE.

BUT BUT BUT (and this is a shrewd marketing move)

they allow open comments on the stories. So the newspaper writers can claim "racial sensitivity" not drawing the ire of Jesse Jackson and his ilk, while at the same time, capitalizing and PROFITING from racially charged comments, which generate TONS of traffic and ad revenue.

It's like they're purposely angering folks like you who'll end up spending time commenting on their news sites (basically working for the newspaper for free to drive more traffic).

 

[Bible_Belt]

I agree. News is sold more so than it is reported. They report what people want to hear and are in competition with each other for stories that create the widest-reaching emotional response. Not to deny that the race angle exists, I think it is the baby shot in its mothers arms that is the biggest reason that this story is reported. Dead kids make good news, the younger the better.

 

[( . )( . )]

The leftist war-cry always revolves around attacking the messenger instead of debating the message (and I'm not calling you a leftist, I am merely pointing out the way that emotion fights reason).

Of course he's a lefty. He's 17, weren't we all at that age? Especially the products of single mother/ beta father demographic that swarm to these boards. Think I've seen maybe 2 teenagers that aren't spewing (their parent/s and TV's) leftoid bile in the entire time I've been here.

Reminds me of that Winston Churchill quote:

"If you're not liberal when you're young, you have no heart. If you're not conservative when you're older, you have no brain."

And note he said that back when liberalism wasn't anywhere near the destructive ideology it is today mind you. I swear the more I read of that guy and what he said the more I'm thinking he was years ahead of his time.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

I do think there is more to it though, mainly for the theme consistently displayed by the left leaning media.

They are ok with controversy, only if it attacks the right-side of the political spectrum, but not if it hurts their own agenda.

A great book that describes "left" thinking and "right" thinking in detail is Thomas Sowell's "Vision Of The Anointed"

He basically describes two viewpoints of "reality." :

One group (those on the right) see the way things "are" and then get to work creating what they want. Those that hold this view are generally conservatives, business owners, entrepreneurs, realists, etc.

Then there's the other group (the left), which have a preconceived view of how society "should be" and when they look at reality, they only see what's wrong, and what needs "fixing."

Naturally, those in the media are drawn to it because it puts them in a position of "authority" as they can pick and choose and spin and tell the rest of us dumb citizens what's important, and what we should be thinking.

Anything that leans toward individual freedom, personal choice and responsibility is HATED by the "anointed", because on a basic level, it ignores their self-congratulatory, and self-proclaimed power.

That's why the media generally LOVE to focus on stories of oppressed / oppressors, villains and victims, and wrongs that need "righting."


Any group that THEY have decided is "oppressed" (or political parties that support them) can NEVER do wrong.

Simply because in their view, any distinction between social class, income levels, skills, work force participation, etc, is NEVER due to general differences between individuals, but ALWAYS due to oppression and NEEDS fixing.

To suggest otherwise, in their view, would be PURE BLASPHEMY.

It would be like the Pope announcing the CHUGGING KOCK is an accepted form of income generation.

 

[OzyBoy]

That is really messed up.

 

[speed dawg]

Very good points taiyuu, Danger and PairPlus. I suspect there is a good balance where we can all flourish. Sort of like government intervention. A little is good, we need a little bit to fund infrastructure, etc. To go 100% states' rights, well, you'd have an awesome interstate system in Texas that turns into a dirt road in Louisiana.

 

[speed dawg]

I keep wanting to reply, but I simply can't do it any better than Danger.

Social Leper, just a side note....the numbers and statistics don't bear out the bullcrap women spew about rape and such. But they do show that blacks on average commit more crimes than whites. That's as simple as I can make it. You either acknowledge and accept the facts or you don't.

Let's keep this in the U.S. and similar type areas. They don't even keep accurate crime records in Africa where they massacre each other daily, so it would be extremely difficult to portray this world-wide.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

Probably true but at the same time the Founders were very much authors of change(conservatives at the time being pro-tyranny) and libertarians today are in the same boat(fighting against neoconservatives and liberals). Focusing too much on how things are is just reactionary. At the same time, so is reflexively wanting to change everything the way liberals do, they can be just as dogmatic.

The "reality" Sowell describes are not current affairs, situations, or current levels of wealth distribution. More like human nature, and basic economic principles of human action.

This is NOT about accepting the "status quo" or not being some kind of "reactionary" or "revolutionary."

This is about the reality of human nature, human ability and the economy of human action.

REALITY

more of something is better than less of something
something now is better than the same thing later
less effort for something is better than more effort for the same thing
everybody does NOT have equal skills
everybody does NOT have equal intelligence
everybody does NOT have equal abilities

Given the above, varying levels of wealth in society will necessarily happen.

That is the REALITY. Certain people will gravitate to certain jobs based on their skill level, and based on the demand of society for that particular skill, their income will be different.

REALITY.

Some will be POOR. Some will be RICH. Some will pull massive HB10's left and right, Some will be lucky to get a handjob from a drunk warpig.


ON THE OTHER HAND, The LEFT, see's differences in wealth levels, employment levels, access to HB8+'s and thinks that something is WRONG.

Something needs to BE DONE to "level" the results.

Poor people aren't poor because they suck at making money, they're poor because they're being EXPLOITED.

Rich people aren't rich because they're good at providing something people want to buy, they're rich because they're CHEATING.


They don't want to "level the playing field" allowing everybody to play by the same rules, they want to "level the same outcome" so that in a society that's

10% black
50% women
30% Hispanic
60% white

Every job, every income level, every bank loan approval should have the SAME BREAKDOWN.

Otherwise, SOMETHING IS WRONG and those that HAVE are exploiting those that HAVE NOT.

 

[FinalWay]

Very sad indeed! However, does anyone take things like this with a grain of salt? They only tell you what they want you to hear! I think it's deeper than just a child being shot, and that's what it takes to shove things down a gullible persons throat. Guns..look at most of the stories and they lead you to the same point