Sarah Palin is bangable

[Darth]

If you guys do nothing else, watch this short video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD6MUWi-1gE

This man is actually saying something.

 

[toddlips]

Picking John McCain for President is like saying "You're the best party to fix the horrendous actions of your own party."

 

[Wired for Sound]

"violated UN ceasefire" hahahaha

war = congress declares war. illegal war = potus decides to invade a country for whatever reason

Now now, what did I tell you about staying off of moveon.org? The President didn't "decide" to invade Iraq for "whatever reason." I don't know if you were watching the news the past 7 years or not, but you see, there was this incident where 19 guys flew jets into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon which killed 3,000 innocent civilians. THEN, we learned that Saddam Hussein (a ruthless dictator that was the leader of aforementioned nation) was harboring members of the terrorist organization that these terrorists belonged to. After the War on Terror was declared, Iraq fell under the banner of a nation that was harboring terrorists and perhaps even hiding weapons of mass destruction. Put all these factors into play and combine the fact that Saddam violated the ceasefire agreement, and you've got yourself a full-blown conflict.

So no. We did not invade Iraq for "whatever reason." Jesus. Those people on those far-left websites you've been hanging out on are seriously corrupting our country's youth.

fact is, my argument still holds since the trilions invested in this war could've been invested in infrastructure at home and into programs that help capture the future for today's young.

Totally, man. In fact...we should just go ahead and disband the entire military to help fund universal healthcare and dismantle the border patrol so we can fund illegal immigration. Afterwards, we can all hit the hash pipe and go tree-sitting. Ya with me?

executive experience? hahaah dumbass people like you like alliteration that much eh?

No, I just prefer a President that actually knows what they're doing as opposed to going on Oprah and the View to dance and talk about how he has Jay-Z on his iPod. Call me crazy. (or any of the other playground personal attacks that you got up your sleeve..."dumbass" and "poo-poo head" don't really cut it in grown-up conversations anymore.)

 

[Darth]

But it's not about party anymore.

I still say that neither candidate understands how vulnerable the USA is right now. China practically owns us now. They own our economy.

We're in trouble. And nobody's saying a thing.

 

[SuavePlaya]

Wired you must be the biggest idiot on this site. If you watch the news lol didn't they say your points for war were all an error of information. If I were you I would forget about the youth right now and check yourself first. I guess the government tapping our phones is also legal, but hey the media told me it's okay so let me forget it ever happened.

 

[speakeasy]

I don't agree with McCain on a lot either, but unlike Obama I feel like I know exactly what his agenda is and I can trust his word.

Trust his word on what? That he'd be willing to be in Iraq for another 100 years? That he'd promise even more tax cuts for those who need them the least? That his solution for our energy problems is more domestic drilling rather than investing in alternative energy(look at brazil and iceland, now energy independent due to investing in renewable sources, why can't America be the leader in this?).

We're about to go into a big depression within the next 3-4 years.

That may happen regardless of what we elect. Who ever ends up president is inheriting 8 years of Bush's aftermath. The president is only one factor in the economy and our economy is so intertwined with the rest of the world that we are affected.

Electing Obama would be a disaster. Let all the illegal immigrants in. Give them driver's licenses. Put even MORE regulations on American industry. Give communist China even MORE power and more of our money.

1) Obama said nothing about letting illegal immigrants all in. And number two, his position is no different than McCain's. They both supported Bush's immigration reform bill. So if you are voting for McCain because you don't like Obama on immigration, you are getting the exact same with McCain. As for regulations on industry, I don't know exactly what you are talking about specifically. Giving China more power and our money? What on earth does that mean???

Neither of the candidates get why the economy is going down. It's not just because of oil companies. It's because America isn't producing hardly ANYTHING anymore. Because it's cheaper to do it overseas where there are no health regulations, etc.

Huh?? And this is a REASON you want to vote for McCain?? Are you kidding me??? Obama wants to reform things like Nafta that send jobs overseas. He wants to penalize companies that ship jobs abroad and give tax incentives to those that stay. McCain is very openly on the record as saying he supports a global economy, which means that he's a free market trader who has no problem with jobs going abroad.

And on top of that we're overexpanding and trying to bring democracy to Iraq, spending billions better spent on our own industries, military, etc.??

And once again, you are voting for McCain for this??? McCain supports the war, Obama was against it from the start.

 

[Darth]

No time to respond now, but I disagree with some of what you said. There's still no way I'm voting for Obama, he's practically a communist. But the two things you pointed out...

1. McCain is just as weak on illegal immigration
2. McCain wants a "global economy"..not protecting our industry, which is a threat to national security

These are the two biggest reasons I wish we hadn't nominated McCain.

And as for Pres. Bush, he's the most liberal spender we've had in a long time. No argument there.

But that doesn't mean we elect someone far MORE liberal because you want a Democrat in the White House.

 

[Desert Fox]

Now now, what did I tell you about staying off of moveon.org? The President didn't "decide" to invade Iraq for "whatever reason." I don't know if you were watching the news the past 7 years or not, but you see, there was this incident where 19 guys flew jets into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon which killed 3,000 innocent civilians. THEN, we learned that Saddam Hussein (a ruthless dictator that was the leader of aforementioned nation) was harboring members of the terrorist organization that these terrorists belonged to. After the War on Terror was declared, Iraq fell under the banner of a nation that was harboring terrorists and perhaps even hiding weapons of mass destruction. Put all these factors into play and combine the fact that Saddam violated the ceasefire agreement, and you've got yourself a full-blown conflict.

So no. We did not invade Iraq for "whatever reason." Jesus. Those people on those far-left websites you've been hanging out on are seriously corrupting our country's youth.

1) hmm wtf is moveon.org?

2) you obviously haven't been reading the news. i understand cuz there's probably no internet that far up your own ass. but i'm just updating u on the world and letting u know that all that stuff was a lie. al qaeda was never affiliated with iraq. only after the usa invaded...key word INVADED iraq, did "alqaeda in iraq" form.

3) why do you think these terrorists attack the USA and not other free countries so frequently? sure there are the nutjobs.

but then there is the 700+ military bases the USA has around the world. neocolonialism at its finiest...so many people hate the USA and you wanna vote for this fvcker haha fine, i can't gonna change your neocon mind, but damn it sucks to be living with retards like you.

read up on the news and check yourself first before you tell me about moveon.org lmao...:crackup:

 

[user43770]

but damn it sucks to be living with retards like you.

The same thing could be said about you.

 

[Darth]

Let's keep this civil fellas....

"The man admitted to not knowing **** about economics, how would he fix the current situation?"

At least he admitted it.

Hopefully he will appoint advisers that do. In any case, if we do get into major trouble, do you really want the most liberal senator to this date in charge? Or someone with years and years of military and political experience to draw from.

But yes, McCain's lack of economic knowledge is worrisome. I wish he knew more on that topic. But that doesn't mean I'm going to turn around and vote for know-nothing Obama. What a disaster if he gets elected...

And don't call us racist if we don't like Obama BTW. What a shallow thing to say. If Condaleeza Rice was running, I'd vote for her without a second thought.

 

[Desert Fox]

The same thing could be said about you.

Hmm Nice one. I see what you did there. Instead of responding to my arguments you picked out an insult I made and say "no."

 

[user43770]

Hmm Nice one. I see what you did there. Instead of responding to my arguments you picked out an insult I made and say "no."

What arguments? You didn't speak of any of Obama's policies. You gave me the usual war rant and concluded by calling anyone with a different opinion a "retard."

 

[ketostix]

illegal war as it was not approved by congress. congress must declare war, not the potus

The Congress did vote for the war. Besides by law the President doesn't have to have congressional approval to take military action. What are you talking about?

 

[Smack]

Sarah Palin is not that hot compared to most younger women. She's nothing special and half way through her first term, should McCain win, she'll be all wrinkly. End of.

 

[ketostix]

They care more about how a candidate makes them "feel" than whether that candidate's policies are in their own best interest. Bush is case in point. He basically uses the Christians. Most of them are lower or middle class, he gives tax cuts to his rich buddies, loots the treasury and plunges the nation into massive debt, handing out untold billions in no bid contracts to his oil mogul buddies while the middle class gets to watch their jobs shipped over seas, gas skyrocket, food and healthcare skyrocket, inflation up the ass. All studies show that the rich have benefitted immensely under Bush while wages for the average person are falling. CEO pay has gone into the stratosphere, and McCain/Palin think these people should get even more tax breaks. But noooo....Palin is better because she makes stupid jokes about being a hockey mom, lipstick and pit bulls. Who cares if her economic policies will rape the middle class up the ass...you know especially when the other guy is black. Meanwhile Bush vetos any attempt for a windfall tax on oil companies who make more in one year than the GDP of many countries. Yet all Bush has to do is wave a bible in the air and have the Christian coalition rally the base on "morals and values" and the typical American will fall in line and vote for someone who is detrimental to their own economic well being and say nonsense like "Bush seems like a guy I could have a beer with, he's a straight shooter! Yeehaw!" Such morons. Such, utter, utter morons. And here we go again with Palin.

Well I'm not going to debate what Obama or McCain will do or won't do. You could debate that to no end. I'll just say you are mostly engaging in wishful thinking and what you hope Obama will do not what he actually will do. And on the flipside, you are painting the worst case scenario about McCain/Palin.

What I do know for certain is there are so many liberal wacko's in the Democrat party, the feminist, the socialist, enviromentalist, the race card players, etc., and they will fill his administration. McCain is a known quanity. Worst case scenario McCain should still be a lot better than Bush. But with a liberal administration who knows how bad it could be. It's too much of a risk for basically little upside. McCain is moderate and Obama is not. I want a moderate administration. That's all I'm going to say about the two candidates.

 

[Truman181]

Good point Keto,

People always criticize McCain for being too moderate and not 'conservative' enough.

I think being extremely conservative or extremely liberal is not good.

 

[Truman181]

Now now, what did I tell you about staying off of moveon.org? The President didn't "decide" to invade Iraq for "whatever reason." I don't know if you were watching the news the past 7 years or not, but you see, there was this incident where 19 guys flew jets into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon which killed 3,000 innocent civilians. THEN, we learned that Saddam Hussein (a ruthless dictator that was the leader of aforementioned nation) was harboring members of the terrorist organization that these terrorists belonged to. After the War on Terror was declared, Iraq fell under the banner of a nation that was harboring terrorists and perhaps even hiding weapons of mass destruction. Put all these factors into play and combine the fact that Saddam violated the ceasefire agreement, and you've got yourself a full-blown conflict.

I love arguments where people pull 'the race card' don't you??? And here you did something just as bad, you pulled the old '9-11 card'.

9-11 occurred because we built our bases in the Saudi Holy Land and the Islams don't like that. How would we like it if the Chinese built bases on our land?? Not too much I think...

Now do your homework piano boy (get off the piano for awhile) and study current events before you start spouting what the corporate controlled media spoon feeds you.

So no. We did not invade Iraq for "whatever reason." Jesus. Those people on those far-left websites you've been hanging out on are seriously corrupting our country's youth.

Whatever reason we invaded Iraq....it was a mistake, time to bring the boys home.

Totally, man. In fact...we should just go ahead and disband the entire military to help fund universal healthcare and dismantle the border patrol so we can fund illegal immigration. Afterwards, we can all hit the hash pipe and go tree-sitting. Ya with me?

Nope, we should use the military to defend our borders and US interests, instead of policing the world and creating hostility far and wide and also insuring foreign independence on our aid.

No, I just prefer a President that actually knows what they're doing as opposed to going on Oprah and the View to dance and talk about how he has Jay-Z on his iPod. Call me crazy. (or any of the other playground personal attacks that you got up your sleeve..."dumbass" and "poo-poo head" don't really cut it in grown-up conversations anymore.)

Actually agree with you on that one....Obama does suck.

 

[speakeasy]

Obama is liberal no doubt about it. He's not an EXTREME liberal like Kucinich, I wouldn't even say he's as liberal as Al Gore. The guy is a liberal with a very moderate demeanor. He is not a polarizing personality like Palin or Hillary. But to hear republicans talk, you'd think the guy was Castro.

 

[DrD77]

Well, I'm voting for John McCain. I think if Obama gets elected, our country will fall apart. I wouldn't feel safe at night to know that we have a guy who wants to "talk" to the terrorists. I want a president who takes action against the them. Good thing that McCain has now topped Obama in the latest polls. All of the biased liberal news media's attack on Sarah Palin did nothing but help their campaign. I think Sarah was an excellent choice for VP. I can't wait to cast my vote for McCain, because for one it will be my first time voting and for two I will know that I am choosing the right candidate.

Barack Obama can kiss my ass with all of that change talk. He hasn't told us what kind of change it will be. I am around 100% sure it would be a horrendous/disasterous change for the USA. And his wife can also kiss my ass with her "I'm finally proud to be an American" talk. Dumb *****.

Well I could say a lot more, but I'm going to go watch fox news. That's only real channel that isn't liberal. Cnn, Nbc, Abc, and Cbs all should be taken off of the air.

Anyways, thats my opinion. And this is America, so I have the right to say whatever I want.

 

[DrD77]

And don't call us racist if we don't like Obama BTW. What a shallow thing to say. If Condaleeza Rice was running, I'd vote for her without a second thought.

I would vote for her too.