Sarah Palin is bangable

Status
Not open for further replies.

Truman181

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
298
Reaction score
27
Everyone says that the economy is poor because of 8 years of Bush....but I wonder....

Sure the economy was GREAT in the 90s....but was that because Clinton was in office and he magically made it all better???? Or was the economy great in the 90s because of the previous 12 years of Republicans in the White House??

And the economy is lousy in the New Millennium....is that because a Republican has been in the White House THIS decade??? Or is the economy bad this decade because Clinton was in office for 8 years before this decade???

Which came first, the chicken or the egg...

By no means am I a fan of Bush....but we are living in an economic crises here....it makes you wonder what really happened....is it what the media wants us to believe? That Bush was the cause....hmmm
 

Desert Fox

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
787
Reaction score
22
Truman181 said:
Everyone says that the economy is poor because of 8 years of Bush....but I wonder....

Sure the economy was GREAT in the 90s....but was that because Clinton was in office and he magically made it all better???? Or was the economy great in the 90s because of the previous 12 years of Republicans in the White House??

And the economy is lousy in the New Millennium....is that because a Republican has been in the White House THIS decade??? Or is the economy bad this decade because Clinton was in office for 8 years before this decade???

Which came first, the chicken or the egg...

By no means am I a fan of Bush....but we are living in an economic crises here....it makes you wonder what really happened....is it what the media wants us to believe? That Bush was the cause....hmmm
i'm pretty sure a useless and illegal war that forces us to borrow trillions from the chinese hurts the country

but you know, it might've been clinton who did all that
 

Don't always be the one putting yourself out for her. Don't always be the one putting all the effort and work into the relationship. Let her, and expect her, to treat you as well as you treat her, and to improve the quality of your life.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,871
Reaction score
55
Desert Fox said:
i'm pretty sure a useless and illegal war that forces us to borrow trillions from the chinese hurts the country

but you know, it might've been clinton who did all that
The Iraq war may have been useless and built on erroneous information and all that but an illegal war? It had UN approval by vote and UN resolutions. I hate when people say "illegal war" as if we need a war to be "legalized" (whatever that means) by other countries' opinion who don't like us and are our enemies anyway. I do think the Bush administration is responsible for this economy but now I see why they don't allow politics on this site, people say the most ridiculous things.
 

Levex

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 31, 2002
Messages
1,088
Reaction score
8
Location
LA
This thread is already so getting locked up, so i won't feel bad throwing this in:


Defend this administration all you like, but if we took all those trillions spent on Iraq war and invested it in America's crumbling infrastructure we'd be a hell of a lot better off and safer than we are right now.

Now we're broke,our military is drained and tired, the rest of the civilized world quietly hates us, terror cells are getting more recruits than ever, and Russia is running circles around us poking us with a stick and calling our mom a b1tch.

So lets all vote for a trigger happy senile old man who can't remember any of his previous votes or statements when asked, and a rifle-shooting housewife who doesn't believe in contraception and birth control(that worked out real well for her daughter btw..) and hope for the best.

People, seriously? :confused:
 

Truman181

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
298
Reaction score
27
Levex man,

You're trying to make this a partisan issue. I'm AGAINST the war. The only candidate I support is Ron Paul, the only Republican candidate who was against the war.

Don't throw the opposition of the war out there as the Democrat's saving grace.

You are right, we have no business spending billions and billions on an unjust war. It's not the duty of the United States to be the policeman of the world.

But at the same time, a candidate for president has no business proposing the economic spending Obama has.

The answer to the economic problem is to DECREASE the size of government, not increase it. Lower taxes. Let people keep what they will earn. That will stimulate the economy.

And yes, let's end this unjust war asap.
 

SuavePlaya

Don Juan
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
185
Reaction score
3
Who don't like us and are our enemies anyway. Well when you have ignorant americans like yourself that believe everything the media tells them we won't have any enemies. If you tell a fat girl shes pretty million times a day, she will eventually believe it. There is a thing called logic use it trust me it's not dangerous. I do agree when you say why politics shouldn't be discussed on this board just because of people like you that were born with no mind of their own. Truman, it's funny you say that because they always try to make ron paul look like the crazy guy. If ron paul was running he would have gotten my vote. Obama and Mccain you won't see any differences.
 

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
77
Levex said:
This thread is already so getting locked up, so i won't feel bad throwing this in:


Defend this administration all you like, but if we took all those trillions spent on Iraq war and invested it in America's crumbling infrastructure we'd be a hell of a lot better off and safer than we are right now.

Now we're broke,our military is drained and tired, the rest of the civilized world quietly hates us, terror cells are getting more recruits than ever, and Russia is running circles around us poking us with a stick and calling our mom a b1tch.

So lets all vote for a trigger happy senile old man who can't remember any of his previous votes or statements when asked, and a rifle-shooting housewife who doesn't believe in contraception and birth control(that worked out real well for her daughter btw..) and hope for the best.

People, seriously? :confused:
:cheer:
 

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
77
TyTe`EyEz said:
There are plenty of reasons that I'm going to vote Republican; Obama's skin color is not one of them.
I don't accuse everyone who doesn't like Obama to be against him because he's black. Some people simply don't like his positions, that's fine. If that's the reason you are against him, that's perfectly legit. But we can't deny the fact that in a close election, if you have people that won't vote for him because he's black, that is going to make the difference in the election. Think about this, why are so many Hillary voters going to vote for McCain? Obama has basically the same policy positions as Hillary, so why would all these working class whites in middle America who were going to vote for Hillary now switching over to vote for McCain? Why would they vote for someone from the OPPOSING party when there is someone in their own party with the identical views of Hillary running? And I'm to believe it's not because of Obama's race? Look at this article here, it has PROOF from exit polls that Obama's race is a large factor. At least 12% of the electorate OPENLY ADMIT that they won't vote for Obama because of his race. So you can only imagine what the number would be if it included those who don't have to guts to openly admit it: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/colu...scussed__but_Obama_s_race_may_be_decider.html

And look all this talk about Obama's experience, Palin has no more experience or record than Obama, yet these same people that trash Obama's experience are cheerleading for Palin. Such hypocritical BS. Obama has been Senator as long as Palin has been governor. Obama was well known nationally long before he started running. Nobody had even heard of Palin until last week. Obama fought his way hard through the primaries. He overturned even the Clintons, who nobody thought would be beat out. He didn't get lucky, he did it because he is clear, intelligent, articulate, classy and sticks to the issues without attacking people like pit bull. It's a breath of fresh air. Palin is just the opposte. She got lucky. She was appointed. If she had to go through the primary process and debate, Romney, Huckabee, Guilliani and McCain, she wouldn't have lasted a day in those primaries and you know it! She'd have been shown for what she is, a second rate candidate people could care less about other than her looks. And that's the truth.
 

Junkyard

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Location
NYC
She aint all that to me

BUT, shes way more smashable than 99.9% of women in politics so thats why she stands out more

but put her out on the streets and most dudes wouldnt look twice
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,871
Reaction score
55
speakeasy said:
I don't accuse everyone who doesn't like Obama to be against him because he's black. Some people simply don't like his positions, that's fine. If that's the reason you are against him, that's perfectly legit. But we can't deny the fact that in a close election, if you have people that won't vote for him because he's black, that is going to make the difference in the election. Think about this, why are so many Hillary voters going to vote for McCain? Obama has basically the same policy positions as Hillary, so why would all these working class whites in middle America who were going to vote for Hillary now switching over to vote for McCain? Why would they vote for someone from the OPPOSING party when there is someone in their own party with the identical views of Hillary running? And I'm to believe it's not because of Obama's race? Look at this article here, it has PROOF from exit polls that Obama's race is a large factor. At least 12% of the electorate OPENLY ADMIT that they won't vote for Obama because of his race. So you can only imagine what the number would be if it included those who don't have to guts to openly admit it: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/colu...scussed__but_Obama_s_race_may_be_decider.html
Yeah but that works both ways. Some people are voting for Obama just because he's black and won't vote for McCain no matter what,and some women liked Hillary just because she's a woman. I'm sure Edwards felt that Obama being black was an advantage. People also vote for the candidate that they think will most benefit their identity group or vote against the candidate they think will unbeneficial to their identity group. The thing is you can't shame people into voting a certain way.
 

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
77
ketostix said:
Yeah but that works both ways. Some people are voting for Obama just because he's black
I guarantee you that the net number of people who won't vote for Obama because he's black is greater than the number who would vote for him because he's black. If anyone denies that being a minority running for president is a liability(not necessarily a deciding factor per se, but a liability) then you just aren't seeing the forest for the trees.
 
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
108
Reaction score
1
Desert Fox said:
i'm pretty sure a useless and illegal war that...
Whoa whoa whoa...illegal? If you can close that moveon.org tab for 2 seconds and actually do some real research, you will find out that Saddam violated the U.N. ceasefire agreement 17 times. We had every right to enter Iraq. Bet ya didn't hear THAT on MSNBC, did ya? ;)

Anyway. Obama has VERY little executive experience, and would fail miserably in the White House. That's all that really matters. Vote for the other guy, unless he has some equally bright red flag on his resume. As far as I know...he doesn't.
 

Don't always be the one putting yourself out for her. Don't always be the one putting all the effort and work into the relationship. Let her, and expect her, to treat you as well as you treat her, and to improve the quality of your life.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
77
Wired for Sound said:
Anyway. Obama has VERY little executive experience, and would fail miserably in the White House. That's all that really matters.
Well if someone had taken that same advice with regards to Abraham Lincoln, the U.S. would be two seperate countries right now. Obama has more experience than Lincoln had, and yet Lincoln turned out to be one of the greatest presidents in history. Licoln isn't the only great president that had little political experience, and there are many presidents that had lots of experience but were failures. Experience certainly counts for something, but more important is ability to lead, judgement and command of the issues. Bush has much more experience in politics than Obama, but as we can see, he lacks judgement and intelligence. If Bush had 10 more years in government, he's still be a cluster****. When Obama announced his candidacy, I found myself wishing he had ran for governor or Illinois first before trying for the white house, just because his experience issue would be a liability, and with race already a liablity amongst many voters, he doesn't need a second.

I'm going to vote for Obama regardless of the thin resume because 1) who he is, and 2) because of his policy positions. I think man has the right tone, he is not polarizing in his rhetoric, sticks to the issues rather than attacks people, has ran a very classy campaign, has gone through the arduous task of eliminating all his rivals one by one in the primaries in one of the longest races of all time, shows that he has thoughts of his own in that he writes his own speeches, has lived abroad and been exposed to other cultures which is an important part of understanding the world situation, seems to have the economic interest of the middle class at heart, and doesn't demonstrate that "shoot first ask questions later" attitude of the current administration. These are the reasons I will vote for him.
 

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
77
ketostix said:
See, this just strengthens the argument in favor of Palin/McCain. I'd never vote the way other countries want me to or believe they have America's best interest at heart and not their own.
Nobody says you should vote with international opinion just for the sake of doing so. I only point it out to show the contrast. How America and Americans think is just SO different from the rest of the world, and not always in a good way. For example, if a European candidate was talking all this religious nonsense like Palin about creationism and no abortion even in the case of rape, they would be laughed off the stage. Or even her being a global warming denier. That kind of cowboy, small town talk that Americans eat up would make someone a laughing stock in most the world where polished, articulate, scholarly candidates are sought after(think Tony Blair). In American the right calls them "elitists". In America these simple-minded clowns like Palin and Bush are taken seriously. Americans are low information voters. They care more about how a candidate makes them "feel" than whether that candidate's policies are in their own best interest. Bush is case in point. He basically uses the Christians. Most of them are lower or middle class, he gives tax cuts to his rich buddies, loots the treasury and plunges the nation into massive debt, handing out untold billions in no bid contracts to his oil mogul buddies while the middle class gets to watch their jobs shipped over seas, gas skyrocket, food and healthcare skyrocket, inflation up the ass. All studies show that the rich have benefitted immensely under Bush while wages for the average person are falling. CEO pay has gone into the stratosphere, and McCain/Palin think these people should get even more tax breaks. But noooo....Palin is better because she makes stupid jokes about being a hockey mom, lipstick and pit bulls. Who cares if her economic policies will rape the middle class up the ass...you know especially when the other guy is black. Meanwhile Bush vetos any attempt for a windfall tax on oil companies who make more in one year than the GDP of many countries. Yet all Bush has to do is wave a bible in the air and have the Christian coalition rally the base on "morals and values" and the typical American will fall in line and vote for someone who is detrimental to their own economic well being and say nonsense like "Bush seems like a guy I could have a beer with, he's a straight shooter! Yeehaw!" Such morons. Such, utter, utter morons. And here we go again with Palin.

I just saw a new poll showing McCain has now been boosted 4 pts ahead of Obama due to Palin. A woman most people know nothing about because she refuses to talk to the media or hold a press conference or talk unless it's read off a teleprompter. Her speech was already written before anyone even new who the VP pick would be. They were expecting it to be a man but had to re-write some parts when they found out it was a woman. American politics is about a shallow as a reality tv show where the person with the prettiest face who is the best actor wins.

This country is going down the toilet.
 

Desert Fox

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
787
Reaction score
22
ketostix said:
The Iraq war may have been useless and built on erroneous information and all that but an illegal war? It had UN approval by vote and UN resolutions. I hate when people say "illegal war" as if we need a war to be "legalized" (whatever that means) by other countries' opinion who don't like us and are our enemies anyway. I do think the Bush administration is responsible for this economy but now I see why they don't allow politics on this site, people say the most ridiculous things.
illegal war as it was not approved by congress. congress must declare war, not the potus
 

Desert Fox

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
787
Reaction score
22
Wired for Sound said:
Whoa whoa whoa...illegal? If you can close that moveon.org tab for 2 seconds and actually do some real research, you will find out that Saddam violated the U.N. ceasefire agreement 17 times. We had every right to enter Iraq. Bet ya didn't hear THAT on MSNBC, did ya? ;)

Anyway. Obama has VERY little executive experience, and would fail miserably in the White House. That's all that really matters. Vote for the other guy, unless he has some equally bright red flag on his resume. As far as I know...he doesn't.
lmao another pro war fool

"violated UN ceasefire" hahahaha

war = congress declares war. illegal war = potus decides to invade a country for whatever reason

fact is, my argument still holds since the trilions invested in this war could've been invested in infrastructure at home and into programs that help capture the future for today's young.

executive experience? hahaah dumbass people like you like alliteration that much eh?
 

Darth

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
1,635
Reaction score
101
Age
34
My 2 Sarah Palin threads get locked up for "hinting" at politics, and this one is open? Lol....

I mean, we should be able to discuss politics in at least one thread here. We obviously all want to...

ketostix said:
To see a woman hold views in opposition to most feminist and see them all riled up is entertaining. It's like watching a cat fight lol.
That's the funny part. They get all frustrated because she's a woman in power, yet she's not a liberal. They can't stand it! Women are only supposed to be liberal feminists like Hillary Clinton...

------------

Anyway, she wasn't the best choice for VP, but I agree with her on most issues and she's hot, so I don't mind too much.

I don't agree with McCain on a lot either, but unlike Obama I feel like I know exactly what his agenda is and I can trust his word.

We're about to go into a big depression within the next 3-4 years. Electing Obama would be a disaster. Let all the illegal immigrants in. Give them driver's licenses. Put even MORE regulations on American industry. Give communist China even MORE power and more of our money.

Neither of the candidates get why the economy is going down. It's not just because of oil companies. It's because America isn't producing hardly ANYTHING anymore. Because it's cheaper to do it overseas where there are no health regulations, etc.

And on top of that we're overexpanding and trying to bring democracy to Iraq, spending billions better spent on our own industries, military, etc.??

So in conclusion, I will vote for McCain. He still doesn't get it, but voting for Obama would be like throwing lead into a sinking ship.

But I just can't believe nobody's talking about this. They're just talking about social issues and criticizing the other party. But who will care about social issues when we're about to go into a depression at best and a Chinese takeover/World War at worst?

Please tell me someone else agrees with me on this MAJOR issue??
 

Don't always be the one putting yourself out for her. Don't always be the one putting all the effort and work into the relationship. Let her, and expect her, to treat you as well as you treat her, and to improve the quality of your life.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top