To those who don't support or understand, the red pill is "MRA misogyny scummy tactics to rape women." It is pointless to say "become red pill. learn the red pill" to a guy who is still living in a blue pill state of mind, or to a girl. Anybody reading red pill writing without personally coming to terms with certain ideas beforehand, will see it the same way an atheist sees the bible. But as soon as a guy starts noticing something isn't right, and starts searching for answers, he'll discover the red pill and it will feel like he is able to see for the first time.
A lot of guys, most in fact, are raised to thinking that their happiness will come by following a certain frame, doing the "right thing," being a "good person," etc. The red pill isn't saying to not be a good person, it's challenging why people think certain things are "right" when they bring no benefits to a man's life. Red pill is reconnecting with the masculine side of a guys nature that has been stripped away through all sorts of social conditioning and agendas enforced through media.
That statement, of course, will bring up another common criticism, which typically sounds something like:
"hurr just be a manly man masculine douchebag and girls will flock to you, right? **** em and dump em, right? that's what you're saying."
But that is not what I'm saying, and it's not what the red pill is saying either. In fact, the very fact that the word "masculine" and telling someone to be more masucline automatically gets equated to saying
"hurr big trucks go fast, pound beer, pound *****, don't skip leg day, am I right?" is the problem the red pill is trying to bring to the surface. Red pill is discovering, understanding, and embracing the positive aspects of your masculinity.
There are masculine traits, and there are feminine traits. Society breeds guys to rejecting and suppressing their masculine traits, which is a big reason why there are so many guys frustrated, and confused, even devastated about their sex life, or lack of sex life. They hold women too highly, and give them too much power over their life. Contrary to what's often said, red pill isn't saying a guy needs power over a woman, it's saying that a guy needs power over
himself, and should constantly strive to attain more power. A guy has to live for himself, and his best interest, - the problem is society tellsl men their best interest is falling in line with a females agenda. A feminist might show me an example of women being photoshopped to look thinner and say, "how is
this falling in line to a woman's agenda?" and I may respond by saying "well, it doesn't. but it does demonstrate the unrealistically high value our society places on women, which ultimately is why feminism has been able to become so prominent and important in our society."
Look at how much
power women have over men. A lot of guys would cut their arm off just to spend time with a slightly hot girl, and base their entire existence around what a girl would think about this or that. Why? Where is his self worth? His value is not demonstrated based on what a woman thinks of him - even though society says that it is.
Again, the red pill is not about holding women down, or promoting an anti-feminist agenda, it's reminding guys to take a look and think about who they are serving. It doesn't matter if a woman doesn't agree with red pill theory. The question the red pill raises is why do so many men support feminism when it actively works against their own best interest? When you understand the answer to that question you are officially red pilled.
I think a great place to start is here:
http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html
Some ideas are on the extreme side, but it's still a great read.