You essentially upped your VALUE in her eyes by showing her that, if she wants you, she has to at times do things that you like to do. You are SOMETHING after all. You are NOT FREE. If she wants to hang with you, it's going to cost her something — time, effort, money.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
And you know that's only way she could've died because of so many right wing religous fundamentalist that are against physician assisted suicide. The majority of people seem to believe in physician assited suicide:Originally posted by Ricky
Nothing like starving a brain dead person to make a liberal judge feel like they've accomplished something.
lolOriginally posted by Ricky
Nothing like starving a brain dead person to make a liberal judge feel like they've accomplished something.
The husband and the government.So now ask yourself, who is really at fault for terri's long and painful death?
physician assisted suicide and starving/dehydrating a human being to death are two completely different things.The majority of people seem to believe in physician assited suicide
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
I'd suggest you knock off the liberal judge bullsh*t real quick... that's the kind of stuff that gets all your topics locked.Originally posted by Ricky
Nothing like starving a brain dead person to make a liberal judge feel like they've accomplished something.
Maybe my point wasn't clear. When I asked that question about Terri's way of dying I was making a point of how she could've died a more peaceful and less painful way of death, if physician assisted suicides were legal. If it was legal then she could've died a far more peaceful and a far less painful death.Originally posted by WastelandWarrior
The husband and the government.
Terry was alive before she was ordered to be taken off of her feeding tube.
I'll grant you that I would never ever want to "live" like that and most people probably wouldn't want to "live" like that, but that doesn't mean she should be starved to death because of a conversation she may or may not have had with her husband years earlier.
physician assisted suicide and starving/dehydrating a human being to death are two completely different things.
Terri Schiavo's death wasn't painful, because Terri Schiavo could not experience pain. Terri Schiavo's brain was atrophied and liquefied.Originally posted by GlutusMaximus86
So now ask yourself, who is really at fault for terri's long and painful death?
Man, I really wish that all the people who are so profoundly concerned about the wellbeing of Terri Schaivo would at least learn how to spell (and pronounce) her name.Originally posted by WastelandWarrior
Terry was alive before she was ordered to be taken off of her feeding tube.
Originally posted by Giovanni Casanova
Terri Schiavo's death wasn't painful, because Terri Schiavo could not experience pain. Terri Schiavo's brain was atrophied and liquefied.
Other things Terri Schiavo couldn't experience:
- love
- sadness
- anger
- thoughts
- fear
- dreams
- sight
- sound
- touch
Man, I don't know about all you guys, but I sure would like to be kept alive like that for AT LEAST 15 years!
Tell her a little about yourself, but not too much. Maintain some mystery. Give her something to think about and wonder about when she's at home.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.