Qualifications for marriage?

Rollo Tomassi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
5,309
Reaction score
340
Age
56
Location
Nevada
A lot of what I'm reading here is pretty much what I'd expect from guys trying to use reason in assessing what they'd consider worth exchanging a lifetime commitment for. Trust, integrity, loyalty, compatibility, basically anything that "sounds right". I've got news for you, none of that makes you anymore deep or pensive or "not like other guys" in your assessments. After 12.5 years of what anyone would esteem a very good marriage, I could sit here and pontificate about the merits of finding a 'good ole fashioned gal' from a solid family, loyal to a fault, to settle down with and move into a deeply satisfying urbane lifestyle, but I'd be just as full of sh!t.

The truth of it is, what are you willing to accept? What delusions, what mindsets, have you internalized or broken past up to this point in your life that are coloring your ideas about marriage? What I find funny about making lists like this is that they generally all contain simplistic truisms that no one is really going to challenge. Of course you want a good mother for your kids, of course you want a girl to stay in shape and sexy into her 50s, who wouldn't? Who's going to argue with 90% of these attributes that would make a woman acceptable for marriage?

Look at the preoccupation in this thread with de-emphasizing appearance or sexual requisites for a wife. We're Men, we have testosterone in our bloodstreams, yes it IS that important and NO you're not shallow for having this as a primary requirement. What's troubling is that in a forum consisting primarily of Men, and in relative anonymity, we think anyone would regard us as being 'shallow' for acknowledging this. In fact, any woman that downplays this need, any woman to utter the phrase "I don't see why sex is SOOO important to guys" should be instantly disqualified from being marriageable.

You see all these flowery declarations of acceptability for marriage ignore what the real compromise is. You are exchanging your future time, your future opportunities (not just sex, but life decisions), your future potential for a lifetime commitment of responsibility, accountability and liability to her - what makes her worth that exchange?

Great integrity, character, loyalty, all the truistic terms you can conjure still wont make her fat ass get to the gym after you've been together for 3 years. And all the sexy, slutty things she's learned over the course of her maturity won't make her any more loyal or 'wife-worthy' or a good mother.
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
37
Heretolearn said:
You want someone to support you through the GOOD and the BAD.
Of course, no one is asking a girl to accept mediocrity permanently :)
Women are not stupid. Ivy league law and med students for instance are often not rich .... yet. They are still highly sought after by most women.
 

Sinistar

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 15, 2005
Messages
550
Reaction score
31
Rollo Tomassi said:
A lot of what I'm reading here is pretty much what I'd expect from guys trying to use reason in assessing what they'd consider worth exchanging a lifetime commitment for. Trust, integrity, loyalty, compatibility, basically anything that "sounds right". I've got news for you, none of that makes you anymore deep or pensive or "not like other guys" in your assessments. After 12.5 years of what anyone would esteem a very good marriage, I could sit here and pontificate about the merits of finding a 'good ole fashioned gal' from a solid family, loyal to a fault, to settle down with and move into a deeply satisfying urbane lifestyle, but I'd be just as full of sh!t.

The truth of it is, what are you willing to accept? What delusions, what mindsets, have you internalized or broken past up to this point in your life that are coloring your ideas about marriage? What I find funny about making lists like this is that they generally all contain simplistic truisms that no one is really going to challenge. Of course you want a good mother for your kids, of course you want a girl to stay in shape and sexy into her 50s, who wouldn't? Who's going to argue with 90% of these attributes that would make a woman acceptable for marriage?

Look at the preoccupation in this thread with de-emphasizing appearance or sexual requisites for a wife. We're Men, we have testosterone in our bloodstreams, yes it IS that important and NO you're not shallow for having this as a primary requirement. What's troubling is that in a forum consisting primarily of Men, and in relative anonymity, we think anyone would regard us as being 'shallow' for acknowledging this. In fact, any woman that downplays this need, any woman to utter the phrase "I don't see why sex is SOOO important to guys" should be instantly disqualified from being marriageable.

You see all these flowery declarations of acceptability for marriage ignore what the real compromise is. You are exchanging your future time, your future opportunities (not just sex, but life decisions), your future potential for a lifetime commitment of responsibility, accountability and liability to her - what makes her worth that exchange?

Great integrity, character, loyalty, all the truistic terms you can conjure still wont make her fat ass get to the gym after you've been together for 3 years. And all the sexy, slutty things she's learned over the course of her maturity won't make her any more loyal or 'wife-worthy' or a good mother.
...said perfectly!

Maybe I should risk taking this step further. Women (yes even wives) want to know they are hot - constantly. They want to know they are desired. Good luck faking that desire if you don't really have it. Plus they want intimacy way more than they will ever list. Wouldn't it be a shocker if women would ever publish their covert list, the one they've been constantly shamed into hiding.

To UnPrez and the other posters who ranked appearance much lower, would you care to explain in a bit more detail why you initially responded the way you did? Do you really feel so strongly that "looks" should not be as important? If so, can you pinpoint where/when in your life you felt this belief was reinforced? For all we know, maybe appearance is so important it is just assumed by guys and so everyone started their list with the other items. Or maybe a combination of shame and programming never lets it cross our minds first anymore?
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
37
The girl I'm mulling over taking it to the next level with is one of the hottest I've ever pulled, plus she's almost the ideal age (25, a little old but OK), she has domestic skills she learned from her mom, works hard, and is always deeply respectful.

She is constantly engaged in approval seeking behaviors that used to embarrass me as a younger more foolish man, but now that I've shed most of my school-ingrained feminist-equality programming I understand it's just her being true to her nature and that I need to express appropriate approval to keep her happy.

It's a lot simpler if we let it be just simple and natural.
 
Top