GreatHornedOwl said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blTOv3oXdbk&feature=related
David DeAngelo, chose his pen handle with the sole purpose of drawing "customers" in.
"Mystery Method", another one.
The names, the demeanors, the routines, the way they formulate their material, the bootcamps, etc.
They're doing it to draw customers in.
You said that David Deangelo chose his pen name for the "sole purpose" of drawing in customers,and Mystery with his "Mystery Method" did the same thing.
Uhh...yeah,so? Is there something wrong with trying to attract more customers to your business?
Both of them have companies,and companies are in business to make money.
You almost make it seem as if they're doing something wrong.
They didn't start out as entrepreneurs with their pickup styles,they were just guys who went out into the field a lot,and through trial and error came up with methods that got THEMSELVES results.
Then they started teaching their friends,then as more and more guys found out about their methods,they decided to start making a living out of it,and why not?
Men trying to understand and have sex with women will NEVER get old or go out of style,so their product will ALWAYS be in demand.
They just need more men to hear about it.
GreatHornedOwl said:
These guys aren't players. They're all college educated in psychology and marketing. These guys are making over 30 MILLION Dollars a year.
And making 30 million dollars is bad?
Yeah,in the beginning they were probably more focused on helping men out because it was still just them and a few guys,but as thousands and thousands of guys flocked in to their seminars/bootcamps and their bank accounts suddenly shot through the roof,their focus probably shifted to maintaining that bottom line.
If I had 30 mil coming in a year,I'd use whatever psychological tactics I could to maintain that inflow too.
If psychology can be used to get sex,I don't see why it can't be used to earn a living.
GreatHornedOwl said:
They're not using the psychology on women, they're using it on YOU to make them money.
So what if they are?
In your "The TRUTH from a Player" thread,you said that if you were to see a hot girl walking in a mall by herself that most people here (on the forum) would probably walk up to her and approach her,but that
YOU would
"wait until she's in the vicinity of other guys because it makes you look good to approach a girl in front of an audience".
What,that's not psychology? You're using the other guys there to make yourself look good by COMPARASION.
In reply #4 of that same thread,you talked about 3 girls.
Girl 1: you followed to the fridge when she went to get a jello shot,and you kissed her on the neck.
Girl 2: you followed her out to her car and kissed her on her neck as well.
Girl 3 fount out that you kissed her two friends which drove her to your bed.
Then girl 2 fount out that you slept with girl 3,so then she slept with you.
Now that move was freakin' GENIUS man,I give you props on that,however that's not the point.
My point is what you said a little later on about those girls in the thread.
You said....and I QUOTE....
"I led those girls on and used it to MY advantage to sleep with them both.
So that was ok,but if the so called "pickup gurus" use something as simple as giving their products a catchy name,you have a problem with that?
I'll give you credit on your "truth from a player" thread,but you lost me on this one.