Cite the text in the rules that states supply and demand must be considered before the banker can hand out bills to players.
That’s a slogan not a solution. Be specific. How do you propose we treat sick poor people?
No, they’re not. Exercise #2: Why is U.S. dollar accepted as a form of payment?
Macron was elected on a Coalition Based - Right Wing Frame. On the intention of ''regrouping every star from every sector and side of politics and State Banking and Finance''
Nope, your slogans are not solutions. You haven’t offered anything but typical right wing platitudes.
The ability to issue currency has nothing to do with supply and demand.
Correct, issuing currency does impact supply. Unfortunately for your irrelevant side argument, supply does not impact ability to issue. Comprende?
That just reflect the difference on point of view.
That is of no consequence to the discussion. The fact stated is that a currency issuing government cannot run out of money it is legally able to produce. This is pure indisputable fact. Repercussions do not dictate the ability to issue currency. Supply and demand do not dictate the ability to issue currency. You refuse to accept the fact that the U.S. government, like the bank in monopoly, cannot run out of money.
It's really beyond corporations as such, the Austrian economics that Danger is a proponent of, a variation of neoliberalism, is a comprehensive ideology of how the world works and how it should be (it even has a fake history on the origins of money). And in that ideology, the method of "research" is axiomatic-deductive, anti-empirical. It creates a network of tautologies that are true simply by definition. So it really doesn't matter that neoliberal capitalism creates things like The Great Depression already 80 years ago, because according to its own methodology, the ideology cannot be wrong. It works much the same as a religious script requiring faith, or the axiom that 1+1=2 in math.
Im American. Half our population has been brainwashed for decades that corporations have our best interest at heart and that market outcomes are always better than the well being of our own population. You would think everyone here is a billionaire by attitudes regarding capitalism and socialism.
I'm saying that in history, hyperinflation has occurred because a country collapses first and the currency follows. If the country's productive capacity is destroyed or absent and it can neither produce what it needs nor export competitively while being dependent on imports and especially if simultaneously beset by capital flight, speculators, foreign debt, and destructive foreign policies (Washington consensus, Versailles treaty), if it doesn't have a functional tax system to manage the flow of funds in society, if the state is corrupt, then production costs and thus consumer prices will increase and what industry remains will break down, causing prices to increase further, and mass printing in a desperate attempt to keep up with the rising prices is a symptom of this collapse.
Never try to read a woman's mind. It is a scary place. Ignore her confusing signals and mixed messages. Assume she is interested in you and act accordingly.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Yes, we already addressed your right wing talking point. Mass printing was the result of extreme political instability.
Incorrectly citing my argument is called LYING. Your argument was that supply and demand dictate a sovereign government’s ability to issue currency. Your understanding of this discussion is limited to the same regurgitated right wing, corporate propaganda that has been fed to you to keep you against government programs.
Now explain how that prevents the bank in Monopoly from paying the players.
"Currency devaluation" is not the same as "consumer price inflation". Currency devaluation means the exchange rate falls, but you are in good faith to your ideology using it to mean consumer price inflation.
