Let me clarify what I mean by humility:
The word humiliation is derived from the word humility, but as I mean the word humility, it is a distinctly different concept than humiliation.
Humiliation is more akin to degradation, shame, embarrassment, and loss of dignity. You feel humiliation when you have done (or think you have done) something that dramatically lowers your value, generates negative attention, or fail in an epic way in front of everyone. When a husband finds out the wife he thought he thought loved him had actually been cheating on him with his best friend for the last 10 years, that's humiliation.
The way I mean humility does not convey this seem feeling at all. What I'm talking about is the mindset that a man develops in which he realizes he is not the center of the universe and stops acting as such. Maybe you could say it's placing others to the priority of yourself WITHOUT sacrifices your personal dignity and boundaries.
I may be wrong, but I'm beginning to think that the secret to being a Don Juan is not going to be found in narcissism, arrogance, unabashed self confidence, and the deprecation of the feminine. I met a man last week who is probably the most self actualized "man" and "alpha" person I've ever met in my entire life. This guy is a very accomplished professional, married a bombshell woman that he has an amazing relationship with, and raised up 3 kids, the oldest being the best "natural" I've ever met. I can't believe I never thought to meet his father.
He talked to me for about 30 minutes last week and 2 and a half hours this past Saturday and tried to direct me down the same path he took his son. He told me that I reminded him of himself, so much so that after he met me he had a conversation with his wife about how much it freaked him out. According to him, there are 3 "keys" to learning how to manage my "edge" as he called it, and the first is learning humility. He said I would find out what he meant by humility through prayer and personal introspection.
I remember reading a thread on here once long before I joined that said something like "do you like making women feel good? If so, you're on your way to success with them". When I am in a group of people, provided I'm not in a bad state, I can take over the group and dominate socially. I can do the same thing in personal conversations. I can say things to people that they've never heard of before, never thought of. But it's all directed inwardly, about myself, my interests, about ME. I'm a very arrogant person. I'm not necessarily a full blown narcissist, but I have tendencies.
This may sound like a heresy on these boards, but something that man asked me was "do you really want to be Don Juan"? And I obviously said "Yes!!!"
He told me that I don't because Don Juan had a fatal problem, and that was that he was not able to find happiness and contentedness in a single woman. His challenge wasn't to find joy in loving with A woman (singular) but to find joy in the act of loving women (plural). And so as soon as he conquered one woman, his joy was gone, and in order to maintain that joy, it was time to find another woman to love. That's a pretty destructive way to go about doing things and doesn't seem to me like it follows any of the principles of being an "alpha male" or a "man".
Isn't a man someone who gives regard to those in his purview, as though he were a king? Would a good man (king) go around then serially "screwing" his women (people)? I don't think so. Wouldn't he rather seek to find ways to improve their standing and overall quality of life rather than use them as personal leverage to whatever end he is seeking to achieve (his own personal happiness/well being)?
Instead, the man encouraged me to learn the art of humility. He gave me several descriptions of what humility was not, but only hinted at what actual humility might be and said it was up to me to figure out what the practical essence of the word means. I'm beginning to think that this inward focus of arrogance and narcissism is a short term gain/long term loss strategy to compensate for a lack of legitimate inner self confidence. If we were really that confident in ourselves, what would these habits serve us? They're illusions to project to the female world that we're totally and unswervingly confident in our selves and our ability to make sound decisions. When people are super confident/sure about things, it's contagious, and it probably makes the woman feel more at ease that the man, despite his toolish nature, has to be adept at making sure her needs will be met because he couldn't have that sort of attitude if he wasn't capable.
Now. Imagine that a man doesn't need to project a confidence illusion because he actually is confident. What will he do? Said another way, if someone challenges me to a bet over a game of pool and I know I am better than them, will there be any need for me to say it? But what if I wasn't better than they were? I would have to put on some sort of veneer suggestive that I was amazing hoping that maybe I could convince him to back down. In the first case, the man will win without having done anything but play pool. In the second case, the man will lose unless he can use the power of illusion and rhetoric to convince the potential better that he is likely to lose.
Now, some might say that humility might lead to greater spiritual fulfillment, but certainly isn't going to do anything to create attraction. To do that, we need to do things like break rapport, build comfort, sexually escalate, elicit values, kino, and so on. Have we all forgotten what Pook said? Go back and read the chapter in the Book of Pook Eliminate Desire or Not?. Pook said he didn't even Kino on the first date anymore, he was able to convey his sexuality exclusively through his legitimate state of self confidence. There was no talk of any of this game theory, he was simply a guy who believed in himself absolutely and found a girl to take through a period of his life in order to have FUN with her!
That makes game very simple
I may be flamed for saying this, but I think if we could bring Pook back and ask him about this, he would say a man who is that confident in himself will have no need to make himself the center of attention. First, he already knows he probably is, because he is that confident in himself. Secondly, he is in the company of a woman that he obviously liked at least enough to spend time with her. He may be an awesome man, but he's not a clairvoyant, so he doesn't know everything about her... in fact, he probably doesn't know very much. So the focus of the interaction becomes on the woman rather than the man. Some people call this eliciting values, but if done out of this state is actually humility.
I could keep talking about this, but I think I've made the point pretty well.
My point is, I'm awful at this sort of thing. Probably because I do not have that level of self confidence. Like I said, I have strong narcissistic tendencies, am arrogant, selfish, and dominate/monopolize interactions with people (especially women). What sorts of things can you do to practice putting other people before yourself without sacrificing your dignity (something a man will never do)? What can you do to service your self confidence, without also feeding narcissism, arrogance, and selfish behavior? In short, how do you develop the qualities Pook described in his most actualized state?