Icky,
First, there are great language differences, even within states and city blocks that may partially account for the "harsh" words that some people use to describe women.
Also, much of the stuff that Mr. Supreme posts is not of his authorship, rather, it consists of things that were written by others concerning what a man is, what a woman wants, etc.
Second, I still think (even keeping in mind the things that you wrote) that happiness STILL is the ultimate goal.
If by the STRANGE chance that being in the KKK actually makes someone happy (which it doesn't, IMO) then they should go for it as long as they know that it would make ME happy to stick thier arms down a garbage disposal!
Many people who needlesly prey on those who are different or weaker or less fortunate etc. are not really happy. The only thing that keeps them going is thier "crusade" against whatever they THINK is the barrier to thier happiness.
In reality, there is a human trait, compassion, that makes us feel good when we help someone ascend in the ranks of the world. The only barrier for this is seeing "others" (whoever they may be) as THEM.
Keeping with your analogy, have you ever seen American History X? The main character (Norton) only begins to see black people as actual people when he is FORCED to realize it, and once he does, he regrets all that he did previous to that point.
With men, women, and sexuality, however, this system of thought begins to falter.
Men and women are not the same. It is the only TRUE case of THEM. The catch is that there is an irresistable attraction, and a large amount of pleasure involved.
This opens up a giant can of illogic and explains why the smartest, morallist, and most pensive people are utter failures with women.
A man thinks he is doing women a favor by not being sexual with them, but the women will HATE him for it.
A man may think he is pleasing the woman by being her jester and footstool, but he will get dumped for it.
Then, you have a guy like P.S. who supposedly "hates" women, yet he gets REWARDED for it!
Answer me this: Why is he getting rewarded if he hates women? Shouldn't the women punish him for that?
I wouldn't reward somebody for hating me!
What is this...illogic? It is a conundrum!
No, the real conundrum is why we think we can look at sexuality through the lens of logic and expect to make any sense out of it. The product of such futility requires many clever psychologists to tie thier minds up into knots spewing forth unintelligible psychobabble.
Look at it like a black box. Instead of trying to get inside of the mind of the player, look at his actions. He gives pleasure to women, and women return the favor.
Where is the hate? If there is any, it manifests itself in strange ways of pleasure, doesn't it? Who cares from what it came from, the final result is good.
You may not agree with me, but I think that the baser elements of human nature are essential for our elucidation and growth. Sexuality shows this to us blatantly, but it is apparent in many social events.
The light and the darkness are nothing without each other. Without CONTRAST, nothing would exist.
The current thought of today to make everything good and wholesome has no basis in reality. In our current (slightly feminine?) society, everyone tries to make it so that noone ever suffers any hardship whatsoever. 'Drown the child in the light, never to know the foul taste of darkness' is the battle cry of the "enlightened" ones.
Then we have a great, smart, NICE child...but we still have a problem. He can't reproduce! How can he accept a free pleasure such as sex? How can he subjugate an independent woman so? No, he will be like Jesus and die a "unsoiled" man.
Nature creates sexuality to force us to embrace our supposedly "evil and hating" natures for the reward of pleasure and happiness. The thoughts are off limits when considering the question of sexuality and morality.
Now, I don't think that P.S. is out killing women, so the supposed "hate" that he has, has no mirror in the world.
So why argue?