You essentially upped your VALUE in her eyes by showing her that, if she wants you, she has to at times do things that you like to do. You are SOMETHING after all. You are NOT FREE. If she wants to hang with you, it's going to cost her something — time, effort, money.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Of course, look how quickly the (media) owned by em all, hush hush swept it under the rug Quick. That's a Tell. They did the same for that NY politician who prosecuted Johns yet allthewhile saw hookers himself. Hell, they even gave him (((his))) own show on TeeVee. Eliot Spitzer was his name.
Legit video.. This guy is knee deep in it.
My ancestry on my mother's mother's side dwelled in and about and invited to King Henry VIII's court. The surname is identified there, mainly knights and women he "favored" (due to beauty and of course raising or behavior/knowledge of how to act "royally") reaching back into the 14th century even. The first governor of Virginia, Patrick Henry is not related to me by blood but by marriage to one of ours' sister so he's a great uncle in my lineage. Royalty followed to America in its beginnings. The names popular there continued to rule the roost here, until Revolution 1789. I'm less English than much of my other family though because of my dad (who never had his DNA done) which brought me down to 51% - his infusion of sperm to the egg brought more Scots Irish, Sweden... Irish were considered lesser beings and I kinda agree that my dad was pretty caveman (more physical and non-listening to take in others' opinions or beliefs), more brutish, certainly less civilized.
sounds like womens behaviour depending on the males status, they break rules if you've got value in her eyes
Wow, no wonder the Queen fired him!
en.wikipedia.org
I have recently put together my family tree, also with branches that go back to the 1500s. Of course, someone's tree is only as accurate as his maternal ancestors were faithful.
That's awesome honestly, lucky to have that information. And you are still more English than the current Royal House btw, they are mostly Danish/German by blood. Their real secret surname is Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.
Men frequently err by talking too much. They often monopolize conversations, droning on and on about topics that bore women to tears. They think they're impressing the women when, in reality, they're depressing the women.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Yes, a royal house changes after there is a female monarch (the new royal house is her husband's house). Queen Victoria married Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (a very small realm of the Holy Roman Empire), so when her son Edward VII took over, the royal house became SCG. Of course, during WW1, having a German name was not a good idea for the royal house, so it was changed to Windsor. (Ironically the monarch of the German Reich was a grandson of Victoria, and thus a 1st cousin of the monarch of the UK.) As Elizabeth II is a woman, her successor, son Charles, will take the adopted royal name of his father Philip, Mountbatten; however, as we are in a femynist age, the name will officially be Mountbatten-Windsor, which also is the official last name for the family.
The only "royalty" I seem to have is that a female ancestor was specially selected to be one of the "filles à marier du roi" (marriageable girls of the king) of Louis XIV (with him personally paying the dowry) to go to French Canada to motivate men to move & stay there. These gals ranged in age from 12
to 25 . I would like to think that these gals selected were all hot, since the king's reputation was at stake, and the men signed marriage contracts to marry them sight-unseen.
Well, William E. Woodward's biography of "Lafayette" tells of his "arranged" marriage to Adrianne, 12 or 13 at the time when Lafayette was 16. She went to prison to be with him so apparently their marriage was very strong. He was so young when he did all that he did for America under George Washington. Today, most guys are still livin with their parents.The only "royalty" I seem to have is that a female ancestor was specially selected to be one of the "filles à marier du roi" (marriageable girls of the king) of Louis XIV (with him personally paying the dowry) to go to French Canada to motivate men to move & stay there. These gals ranged in age from 12
Yes the feminists pretty much fvcked it up yet againYes, a royal house changes after there is a female monarch (the new royal house is her husband's house). Queen Victoria married Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (a very small realm of the Holy Roman Empire), so when her son Edward VII took over, the royal house became SCG. Of course, during WW1, having a German name was not a good idea for the royal house, so it was changed to Windsor. (Ironically the monarch of the German Reich was a grandson of Victoria, and thus a 1st cousin of the monarch of the UK.) As Elizabeth II is a woman, her successor, son Charles, will take the adopted royal name of his father Philip, Mountbatten; however, as we are in a femynist age, the name will officially be Mountbatten-Windsor, which also is the official last name for the family.
Do not be too easy. If you are too easy to get, she will not want you. If you are too easy to keep, she will lose interest in you. If you are too easy to control, she will not respect you.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
