PackDaddy
Don Juan
Sure you may get laid, but at what expense?
Learn from the experience of several DJ friends and I. This summer 2 DJs and myself created dating profiles. Additionally, all 3 of us are good looking guys with good text game. I used OKCupid and the other 2 used Plenty of Fish. Regardless, we experienced the same negative offerings.
For starters, think about the quality of women online dating attracts. Hot women are approached daily and learn from a young age that men gravitate tiwarda them. They develop their lady game and realize their high value. Hot women are not going to go out of their way to create a dating profile because thay don't need it. But then there's the hot ones my buddies and I encountered. Sure, they were hot but they were "off." Something was wrong with them, whether it be dumb as rocks, psychotic, attention *****s, an overdose of b1tchitude, no personality, or a ****tail of the aforementioned. Then there were the ugly girls - self-explanatory. Then, even if one of these hot girls responded, there was still a huge tax bite. Out of the 3 of us, on average, we would get an initial response 50-25% of the time. Then, another 50% of the time we would get a number. Out of those numbers, only about 50% turned into a date. Then, there was the risk of not liking the girl because you never met her - you talked to an internet persona. So maybe half the time, you thought the girl was alright to be around. As you can see, the numbers are dismal. Think about it. All of that damn work just to meet a socially off girl that you can't even stand to be around.
Look at it from this angle. Men join these sites for one thing - putting his stick in a hole. Women, on the other hand, are looking for prince charming. Some are looking for an ONS or **** buddy, but those are rare. With that said, the hot ones are bombarded with messages from desperate guys asking them if "they would like to sit on their throbbing c0cks." If the girl even sees your message, then she's wondering whether you're gonna be "creeper." So, from the get-go, they have negative thoughts about online guys.
However, there were some positives. For the 3 months we had profiles we did experience some success. I f¥cked an HB5 (I got photoshop houdini'd - she looked like a 7 in photos, but I said **** it anyways). I also made a f¥ck friend with an HB7 that was short-lived. One of my buddies made a short-term FBuddy, had a few ONS's, and was catfished (houdini'd). The other buddy had a few ONS's as well. Now here's the catch. We spent 3 months on these sites and were constantly/daily on our iphones shooting messages off. You would think we should have gotten more lays than that.
Moral of the story, it's EASIER to meet women in real life. There are far less problems with this as well. All 3 of us have deleted these dating apps off our phones.
The only real productivity I see in these is that they serve as good texting practice. Otherwise, get out there and keep spinning fellow DJs.
Learn from the experience of several DJ friends and I. This summer 2 DJs and myself created dating profiles. Additionally, all 3 of us are good looking guys with good text game. I used OKCupid and the other 2 used Plenty of Fish. Regardless, we experienced the same negative offerings.
For starters, think about the quality of women online dating attracts. Hot women are approached daily and learn from a young age that men gravitate tiwarda them. They develop their lady game and realize their high value. Hot women are not going to go out of their way to create a dating profile because thay don't need it. But then there's the hot ones my buddies and I encountered. Sure, they were hot but they were "off." Something was wrong with them, whether it be dumb as rocks, psychotic, attention *****s, an overdose of b1tchitude, no personality, or a ****tail of the aforementioned. Then there were the ugly girls - self-explanatory. Then, even if one of these hot girls responded, there was still a huge tax bite. Out of the 3 of us, on average, we would get an initial response 50-25% of the time. Then, another 50% of the time we would get a number. Out of those numbers, only about 50% turned into a date. Then, there was the risk of not liking the girl because you never met her - you talked to an internet persona. So maybe half the time, you thought the girl was alright to be around. As you can see, the numbers are dismal. Think about it. All of that damn work just to meet a socially off girl that you can't even stand to be around.
Look at it from this angle. Men join these sites for one thing - putting his stick in a hole. Women, on the other hand, are looking for prince charming. Some are looking for an ONS or **** buddy, but those are rare. With that said, the hot ones are bombarded with messages from desperate guys asking them if "they would like to sit on their throbbing c0cks." If the girl even sees your message, then she's wondering whether you're gonna be "creeper." So, from the get-go, they have negative thoughts about online guys.
However, there were some positives. For the 3 months we had profiles we did experience some success. I f¥cked an HB5 (I got photoshop houdini'd - she looked like a 7 in photos, but I said **** it anyways). I also made a f¥ck friend with an HB7 that was short-lived. One of my buddies made a short-term FBuddy, had a few ONS's, and was catfished (houdini'd). The other buddy had a few ONS's as well. Now here's the catch. We spent 3 months on these sites and were constantly/daily on our iphones shooting messages off. You would think we should have gotten more lays than that.
Moral of the story, it's EASIER to meet women in real life. There are far less problems with this as well. All 3 of us have deleted these dating apps off our phones.
The only real productivity I see in these is that they serve as good texting practice. Otherwise, get out there and keep spinning fellow DJs.
