one question how reliable is the site...hot or not...

iturbide1981

Don Juan
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
i am just saying i heard about it here...like 3 days ago..and its so cool..so far they gave a 8.7 but you know i think i saw a thread...where they gave you a standarised to calculate your number..better...(ok its not that i am into myself because i know self confidence is the one that decides if you get the girl or not)
 

ryannath

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Messages
716
Reaction score
3
I never really knew if I was good looking or not, so I went on there and I scored a 7.8 in looks, so I guess I am kinda good looking then. I think it's pretty reliable if you get alot of votes.
 

iturbide1981

Don Juan
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
you think so..

i mean theres a lot of frustrated people out there...i mean whos voting..no i am for real...you know like when they bring the votes in after and election...and there always talking about a margin of error..like a
9.3 could really be a 8.1 i dont know
 

PigAdlemPimp

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
393
Reaction score
1
Hot or Not is not reliable at all when it comes to the babes ratings, after I saw this post I had a look at it and rated about 30 babes before I came back to write this.
Of those 30 babes my own score was only higher than the average with one of them whom I gave an 8 and all others combined gave her a 7.
Some of the scores were very inconsistent I thought, one babe was given 9.9 by 700 plus people, this was too high in my opinion, I gave her a 7.
Two other babes one I gave a 2 was rated a 9 by them and another that I rated as being a 3 they gave 9.2.
The babes were given much higher scores than they should have got given their physical appearance in the photos that I saw.
I never looked at any of the dudes photos or ratings, but the babes ratings were not a true reflection of how hot they really were.
 

Obsidian

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 17, 2006
Messages
2,561
Reaction score
26
Location
TN
iturbide1981 said:
they gave you a standarised to calculate your number..better
You're probably referring to my post. I said that the hotornot rating scale is different from the traditional rating scale. An average rating at hotornot is 5 (or slightly above 5, I think). An average rating using the DJ scale is more like 7 for the youthful population. A big chunk of girls fall between 6 and 8, (moreso than fall between 4 and 6).

So if you're young and hotornot tells you "You're hotter than 50% of the guys on this site" and gives you a 5.3 or whatever, that actually equates to about a 7 in the regular framework. If it gives you a 7, you're probably about an 8 or so.

Also, you should think about the fact that attractive people are more likely to put their pics on a site like that than ugly people.

If you get an 8.7 then you're probably very good-looking. You need to wait until you get about 150+ votes, tho, before you get all ****y about it.



Hot or Not is not reliable at all when it comes to the babes ratings, after I saw this post I had a look at it and rated about 30 babes before I came back to write this.
imo, they tend to rate girls higher than they deserve if they are excessively skinny. But that's not just a problem with the site; it's a bias among the general male population. We have an obsession with skeletons nowadays.
 

Serialized3

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 17, 2003
Messages
1,151
Reaction score
18
Location
CO
flows101 said:
You Dont Need Looks To Get Chicks!

High Self-esteem = Loads Of Women.
Dude, you're from the moon. Women are just as shallow as men and rate us "5,6,7,8" etc or "fuckable, non-fuckable"

Anybody who says otherwise is hot and hasn't had to deal with it, in denial or inexperienced.

Let's turn this into another looks-matter debate!:moon:
 

L777

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
20
Age
38
Location
manchester UK
Serialized3 said:
Dude, you're from the moon. Women are just as shallow as men and rate us "5,6,7,8" etc or "fuckable, non-fuckable"

Anybody who says otherwise is hot and hasn't had to deal with it, in denial or inexperienced.

Let's turn this into another looks-matter debate!:moon:
Na man they aren't quite as shallow. But they are shallow...otherwise there'd be no need for this site when you think about it.
 

Serialized3

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 17, 2003
Messages
1,151
Reaction score
18
Location
CO
L777 said:
Na man they aren't quite as shallow. But they are shallow...otherwise there'd be no need for this site when you think about it.
Haha, I suppose you're right, but that's mostly because a lot of guys are shallow as hell. So then women are slightly less so :D. But just barely.

Anyways, the reason I said that is that I've had a lot of female friends before, and we've had some pretty candid talks from everything from looks to **** size. Sometimes they comment on how "hot" a passing guy is. They admit that they won't date a guy unless he's good looking enough for them, or has a car, or has white teeth, or is taller than 6', or whatever silly reason is in their head. But the fact remains is that looks DO matter to women. Thats why most of the time you see guys out with girls that are about as attractive or ugly as they are.

Would you date a girl that's not good looking enough for you? Probably not. (I do because I'm not shallow, but that's just me)

Although it is quite easy to become more attractive to women. Work out, get some stylish clothes, a haircut that matches your personality, and bam a 5 becomes a 7.

It's all been said before.
 

bigjohnson

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
37
Chicks that show lots of skin get better scores too. I've seen some 5s that got 7+ just because they were in their skivvies.

It scored me a 7.6 - 8.1 depending on the pic I posted, and that jibes pretty well with what I figured I'd be - decent but no George Clooney.
 

Raikojo17

Banned
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
982
Reaction score
5
bigjohnson said:
Chicks that show lots of skin get better scores too. I've seen some 5s that got 7+ just because they were in their skivvies.

It scored me a 7.6 - 8.1 depending on the pic I posted, and that jibes pretty well with what I figured I'd be - decent but no George Clooney.
pretty much goes with anyone,lol. i find if you post a ab pic, you get a higher score unless your face is just heavenly.
 

Melvin

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
Northern Cal.
When you ask how reliable it is. It's kind of hard to answer that. Hot or Not and other "rate my pic" sites depend on your selection of picture(s). Generally if you have a decent looking face you'll be in the 7-9 range. Anything above a 9 usually means you have at least a decent face, a nice body, and you're willing to show it in your pic. These are just general rules, there are exceptions.
 

BluEyes

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
614
Reaction score
10
I'm one of the dudes who has NO idea how physically attractive he is.

I have a great body now(hard fvcking work), and I scored an 8.4 on HotOrNot with a weird picture and 250 votes. Of course it was just a face shot...

Nobody has come right out and told me I'm hot...I've gotten cute acouple of times(3), and way back in like grade 8 I was called ugly, but thats only because I had terrible self-esteem and dismal hygeine.

Question: For you guys who would call yourself Hot or Attractive...What makes you think so?
 
Top