Nowhere to hide from the homo agenda

[speakeasy]

No, and the reason for that (and getting back to the OP) is because studies like that would be considered unethical. In all likelihood I'd say that, like most other human conditions, the answer is both nature and nurture, however the homosexual side of the issue has asserted it is a uniquely genetic condition and therefore a civil right issue, whereas the moralistic crowd argue it's a conscious choice. Neither camp is going to concede any middle ground. That's where behaviorism comes in, but both sides don't want any concrete answers.

Science supports your conclusion. A study of identical twins where at least one twin was gay, in about 50% of the cases, the other twin was gay. Now it's obviously not 100% genetics that determine sexual preference or both twins would be gay 100% of the time since they share identical DNA. At the same time, genes must play role, if there's a 50% chance of the twin being gay. It's some mix of both.

 

[spesmilitis]

http://omg.yahoo.com/news/perez-hil...ered-her-question-lost-her-the-crown/21528?nc

even a woman in today's society gets bashed for speaking the truth

edit: I never cared about gay people and what they are all about

but seriously, when i see this kind of IN YOUR FACE agenda, trying to basically say that people cannot even have an OPINION on whether gay people should marry or not, it makes me want to become an anti-gay activist or some shyt like that DAMN!

You can have whatever opinion you want, but nobody is obligated to endorse it.

 

[Outsider]

If I understand what the logical player is saying correctly, he is upset that Ms. California was "punished" for having her anti-homosexual marriage opinion, which cost her the USA crown.

Therefore, if she's not punished for her opinion, what should we do, reward her for it? Should we reward someone who excludes a group of people. Now that is a great message for the kids.

The fact of the matter is this, she has the right to her opinion and that opinion cost her the title. That's just to bad. She has the right to her opinion and the judges have the right to disagree and exclude her from Miss USA.

Ain't that a *****.

"Love Not Hate"

 

[ketostix]

If I understand what the logical player is saying correctly, he is upset that Ms. California was "punished" for having her anti-homosexual marriage opinion, which cost her the USA crown.

Therefore, if she's not punished for her opinion, what should we do, reward her for it? Should we reward someone who excludes a group of people. Now that is a great message for the kids.

The fact of the matter is this, she has the right to her opinion and that opinion cost her the title. That's just to bad. She has the right to her opinion and the judges have the right to disagree and exclude her from Miss USA.

Ain't that a *****.

"Love Not Hate"

Lol what kind of circular reasoning is that? If homos are a minority and they have a right to disagree and exclude heteros from oportunities, then by your reasoning heteros should feel threatened and also have the right to exclude homos from everything too, like being a judge in a Miss America contest. That's right if a homo reveals him or herself and his or her opinion fire him or her before she or he gets you! The pro-gay folks have said it's OK.

People like you will never understand that homos are just like feminist, ethnic activists and every other group activists wanting preferential treatment while they reverse-discriminate against everyone outside of that group.

 

[Outsider]

I think you may have misintepreted the meaning to post, could you please re-read it again.

With that being said:

Firstly, there is no circular reasoining in my arguement.

Secondly, you've made a hasty generalization about my arguement; your if... then statement is false because that is not my reasoning and it is your misintepreted reasoning

Finally, please re-read this post.

 

[Outsider]

I re-checked my arguement couldn't find the circular reasoning. Could you please point it out and repost.
Thank you.

 

[ready123]

People like you will never understand that homos are just like feminist, ethnic activists and every other group activists wanting preferential treatment while they reverse-discriminate against everyone outside of that group.

that's a long-winded way of saying fvck everyone who's not a straight white male

all your arguments assume the minority disagreeing with the majority has equal ramifications as the opposite. in actuality when the minority disagrees with the majority, all that happens is the majority's feelings get hurt. meanwhile, when the majority disagrees with the minority, slavery and other institutionalized forms of oppression go down in history

you're a bigot and you don't even know it keto. stop btching about gay people trying to take sht from you and get out the house more

 

[Bible_Belt]

The existence and prominence of gays should have NO EFFECT on your life.


It shouldn't, but when they become a "movement," then it often does. I was in a religious club in law school. We were small, and quiet, and never refused or harassed anyone in any way. But the lesbian club complained to our very gay-friendly school that our mere existence harassed them, and the school agreed. They said that the religious club had to say "gay is ok" or else they could not be a school club any more.

So we flew in a team of lawyers from Washington DC and sued. The school is a state university, and spent a lot of taxpayer dollars to defend themselves. They racked up a big legal bill for themselves...and lost. They also had to pay our legal fees. The final court opinion was written by a very famous judge and is now used as precedent to keep gay rights activists from kicking religious clubs out of public schools and universities.

I was fine with gay people when they just wanted to be left alone. But now they want to force everyone to agree with them, and it's ridiculous. I don't think there's hardly any oppression of gays left in this country. If so, they just move to the city. If gay people want to be activists so badly, let them go fight the Taliban, the Iranians, and all of the other powers that be who are still executing people for simply being gay. That is oppression.

I just got neg rep'd for this post (you know who you are), but would like to point out that my next door neighbors are 20-something lesbians. We had a big storm that knocked out electricity, and they have been showering at my house for the past two days, because my water heater runs on natural gas and I still had hot water. They had tree limbs break off and fall onto a neighbor's property, who was then rude to them about when they would clean up "your mess off my property." All of that was probably because they were gay. The next day, another neighbor, myself, and my girlfriend chain-sawed the tree and dragged away the branches while my lesbo neighbors were at work. They were very grateful. Now they pound on my back door when they need anything. I loaned them a cel phone today to make a few calls. The "guy" of the couple was complaining about her girlfriend losing her keys even though she said she would hold onto them. We shared a "damn women" moment, like two typical guys.

The point of this story is that your political views should not influence the way that you treat people. I stand against the "homo agenda." But the lesbians next door can come over to shower whenever they like. me casa es su casa - regardless of whom you sleep with.